HPLC UV - VIS Wavelength Accuracy Check (" Calibration ") Notes

To verify correct detector wavelength accuracy of your HPLC UV / VIS module it is periodically necessary to measure the wavelength accuracy against know standards using an appropriate SOP ("fit for purpose"). This may be required as part of a Performance Verification (PV), Installation Qualification (IQ) or Operational Qualification (OQ). 

Wavelength accuracy may be adversely affected (or change) when an UV/VIS detector is serviced/repaired, moved, suffers a physical shock (bumped), large temperature changes occur, a lamp or other optical component is changed, a flow cell is changed, the optics become dirty or contaminated, or due to normal wear and age. The wavelength accuracy of any applicable detectors (e.g. UV, VIS, UV/VIS, DAD, PDA) should be measured on a regular basis as part of "Good Laboratory Practices" (GLP). Depending on the regulations or guidelines applied, most authorities require accuracy to be within 2 to 3 nm of a certified standard within the range used. In practice, we generally achieve accuracy of equal to or better than 0.5 nm across a range of UV / VIS wavelengths. Following good laboratory practice (GLP) requires that we establish the frequency and conditions which determine when they should be verified. Complete documentation of these wavelength checks which describe their purpose, specificity, application and detailed procedures (SOP) should be reviewed.

We present a few suggestions in how to measure the detector wavelength accuracy of your HPLC UV / VIS module. 

• Built-In Test Methods: Most instrument manufacturers incorporate one or more wavelength accuracy checks directly built into their detectors. This allows quick and accurate measurement of the detector's wavelength accuracy for one or more wavelengths in an automated fashion. Most instruments utilize built-in filters (e.g. holmium oxide) which have been treated with chemicals to provide repeatable wavelength spectra which can be used to determine the accuracy of the detector (and adjust it to within specification in most cases, too). If your instrument has one or more of these built-in test filters, then follow the manufacturer's instructions for using them to measure the wavelength accuracy of your detector. 

• Using a solution of high purity ANTHRACENE: Dissolved in an HPLC grade alcohol (i.e. Methanol ) or Acetonitrile (for low UV checks), anthracene has a lambda max of 251 nm. A solution concentration of ~ 1 ug / mL for HPLC use can be injected using a standardized method (SOP) and the area% evaluated, one-at-a-time, at several different wavelengths (for VWD or single wavelength detectors) as follows: 249, 250, 251, 252, 253 nm. Relative to the baseline, the areas should show a peak at 251 nm. If you have a scanning UV/VIS detector (aka: DAD or PDA), then you can scan all wavelengths around the 251 nm region and plot the results using just one run to obtain the same type of data.

• Using a solution of high purity CAFFEINE in HPLC grade water: Caffeine has two useful lambda maximums that we can use for wavelength accuracy checks in the ultraviolet region, 205 nm and 273 nm. We often prepare a range of solutions from 5 ug / mL to 500 ug / mL for linearity testing of UV/VIS detectors, but any of those same solutions could be used for wavelength accuracy checking (similar method as described above for anthracene).

• One of the most widely used methods requires a solution of HOLMIUM PERCHLORATE  solution (NIST). Available for purchase from many chemical suppliers, this acidic solution provides excellent signals for calibration at well documented transmittance bands (i.e. 241.1, 287.1, 361.5 nm and many others out to ~ 640 nm, depending on the solution it is dissolved in). The detector's flow cell can be filled with the solution and measurements made. The solution is also available coated onto quartz slides and is in fact what is found and used in many detectors today as part of their built-in verification. However, you can still prepare your own test solution.

Notes: A reminder that the solution used to prepare the wavelength check standard(s) in will directly affect the results obtained. If you prepare it in a solution which has strong absorbance at or near the region you test, the results obtained may be inaccurate (e.g. a test std dissolved in MeOH used to measure wavelength accuracy at 205 nm would not be an appropriate choice. A standard dissolved in ethyl acetate would obscure the UV wavelengths below its cutoff of ~ 256 nm). Make sure your SOPs state exactly which solutions are used, how they are prepared and which flow cell are used to make the measurements! Flow cells with different dimensions (i.e. path lengths, volumes) will result in different signal outputs. Different background solutions will also result in different results which can not be directly compared (invalid test). For each test, you must use scientifically appropriate methods and the same conditions to make all measurements.

PEAK PURITY Determination by HPLC Diode Array Chromatography Software (UV/VIS): Limitations and Uses

"Peak Purity" software determination by HPLC UV/VIS detection is one of the most abused and easily misunderstood features found in advanced liquid chromatography systems (e.g. HPLC, UHPLC and CE).

For HPLC, one or more inline detectors can be used which provide additional data about a fully resolved peak’s physical or chemical properties. The data obtained can be compared to that of a pure standard, or known impurity. For compounds which absorb light in the region of most UV/VIS detectors (~ 200 to 900 nm), a single wavelength detector (e.g. UV/VIS) provides a very limited second dimension of data (retention time is the first dimension), but a scanning, multi-wavelength UV/VIS detector can add a second and third dimension of data to the retention time. Scanning detectors, commonly known as Diode-Array Detectors (aka: DAD or PDA) are commonly used in HPLC and CE analysis (they are required for routine method development). A scanning DAD can provide detailed sample UV/VIS spectra across a range of wavelengths for each peak, at any retention time recorded, allowing for a 3D plot of the spectra to be recorded much like a “fingerprint”. "Pure" compounds which do absorb light across a pre-defined wavelength range should show identical spectral profiles (“slices”) across the upslope, apex and down slope of the resolved peak. "Impure" peaks may show dissimilar spectra across the width of the peak revealing the presence of a co-eluting peak or impurity. Impure peaks may also NOT show any dissimilar spectra at all (because some compounds may not be detected). When a properly developed HPLC analysis method is used to evaluate the purity of a sample, the single dimension of “retention time” is evaluated with additional dimensions of analysis such as the UV/VIS peak spectra. "Peak Purity" relies on the detection of a sample's spectral profile to detect the presence of an "impurity" (that may have co-eluted with the sample). This additional dimension of analysis (full Spectra) is required to improve the confidence level that a peak may in fact be correctly identified (qualitatively) and does not contain any co-eluting compounds. IOW: "Peak Purity" does not actually test for purity.

Diode-Array 'Software' based Peak purity determination by HPLC is a qualitative assessment of the impurity profile of the sample. It is designed to reveal impurities, NOT prove peak purity. BTW: We really should rename it “Peak Spectral Impurity Assessment" because that is in fact what we are measuring. The algorithm used for Peak Purity determination is designed to confirm the presence of one or more impurities by comparing spectral data slices (multiple slices taken at the apex and both the upslope and down slope sections of the peak).  A mismatch would indicate the peak has not been fully resolved (one or more co-eluting peaks are present). In other words, it is impure by UV/VIS analysis. Note: It does not indicate that the compound is impure, but rather 'the peak' being measured is. As you can see, the concept makes sense, but the how it is used in many laboratories is flawed leading to invalid reports and data.

• “Peak Purity” does not in fact indicate the actual purity of the compound, but instead indicates when a peak may be found to contain impurities. It is an estimated measure of PEAK Impurity.

In simple terms, IF the spectral slices obtained from one peak are not identical, than the peak may contain one or more impurities. Co-elution is the most likely reason for this.

Points to consider when using "Peak Purity" software:

• The absence of any spectral differences across the sample peak are not an indication of actual purity;
• Compounds similar to your sample may have similar absorbance profiles (fooling the system);
• The relative concentration of actual impurities may not be high enough to detect;
• The compounds / impurities may not absorb light at the wavelengths scanned;
• The HPLC method used, the software settings and the parameters that you chose in the ‘Peak Purity’ software menu have a huge effect on the results obtained. Different people often get different results for the same sample. Inputting poor quality settings or using a poor quality method often leads to misleading purity results. This is an advanced software feature requiring many years of training to use. Again, it does NOT test for purity.
  
• The peak of interest must be retained on the column (K prime > 2) and resolved apart from any observed peaks. Don't use peak purity to analyze peak(s) which elute at or near the column void volume (Low K prime values may demonstrate that good chromatography fundamentals were ignored. Poor quality methods fail validation). Poor quality HPLC method and poorly selected DAD "Purity" settings result in invalid results (audits, recalls etc may result from reliance on a subjective "software" feature).

We prefer to think of HPLC 'Peak Purity Assessment' as a null test. If the recorded peak spectral data slices are different, than you probably have co-elution and/or impurities present (so try and develop a better method to resolve the peaks apart). If no differences in the spectra are seen (they are similar), then the peak may be pure or may contain compounds with similar spectra as are commonly seen with related reaction synthesis products or compounds. So only when you detect differences in the acquired spectra can you be confident that there IS a qualitative difference or impurity present. You will not know what percentage of impurity level is (since you do not know what it is).

When configuring the Peak Purity parameters for your sample, you must start with a very high quality HPLC method (A "validated method" is not necessarily a high quality method. "Validation" does not in fact insure that the method follows good chromatography fundamantals). The correct detector sample rate, threshold, slope, signal wavelength and bandwidths need to have been properly selected and used (Reference Wavelength always OFF). The peaks shown in your chromatogram should have excellent symmetry with good on-column retention (K-prime, as applicable to mode), baseline separation (> 2.0 for non-SEC modes) and very low baseline noise levels. The two Peak Purity spectral reference points should be manually selected and placed at times before and after the peak of interest in clear baseline areas where no other peaks or spectra are seen (never use the instrument default settings for reference points!). Select at least 7 spectra from the sample peak for comparison (more detail can be provided with more spectra, but be careful not to select spectra near the baseline or the noise limits). If your method and chromatogram are not of the highest quality, then please do not use the automated "peak purity" analysis feature, instead spend time improving your method.

SUMMARY: 

The HPLC UV/VIS Peak Purity Analysis (“Peak Spectral Purity”) feature is very complex and has many software settings which must be set up correctly to obtain any scientifically useful data regarding possible peak impurity levels. 

• Do NOT use the system default settings / values for 'Peak Purity' ! They are just place holders for actual values (which you must calculate and fill in the correct values for your method).
  

 

* Due to a general lack of formal training, I often see this software feature being used incorrectly by most chromatographers. This is worth repeating... the HPLC method used to obtain the original data must be of the highest quality and the training of the operator must also be at the highest level. To use this advanced software feature successfully, an advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography are required as are a detailed understanding of all of the peak purity software features (how to set the correct threshold, obtain reference baselines, Set sampling rate, noise levels, signal extraction, normalization settings…). Routine HPLC training classes do not cover these types of tasks. Years of specialized training and practical experience are required to use these tools. Never use the “automated” versions or the manufacturer’s default values to find “Peak Purity”. The only correct way to use these features is to manually tune the method and settings to your specific sample. Failure to customize the method and settings used may result in invalid data and incorrect "purity" determinations. 

Due to very complex software setup needed for "Peak Purity" determination by UV/VIS spectra, the requirement for a high quality HPLC method and a high quality data-set,it is our opinion that few should ever use it. In general, the recommendation for most chromatographers is to not use this feature unless first having demonstrated the required skills and advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography. Most of the methods that we professionally review where "Peak Purity" data have been used as part of the method have been found to be based on invalid methods, resulting in any "purity statements" issued as unscientific and invalid. Please proceed cautiously and request professional review of any methods which employ it BEFORE committing to relying on it.

©Copyright, March 1, 1996 by William Letter of Chiralizer Services (Plainsboro, NJ) from a portion of material presented in an HPLC Diode Array Method Development Class.

Chromophore, Chromophores, UV Absorbing for HPLC Analysis and Detection

A compound's absorption coefficient relates to its "strength". I find it useful to know which compounds can (and cannot) be easily detected by UV/VIS and a quick analysis of their chemical groups can provide an answer. Please note that the actual measured absorbance maximums will vary depending on the solution that the compound is dissolved in. Beta-Carotene is included as a very interesting structural example because it is composed of long chains of conjugated double bonds (isoprene units) which are cyclised at each end. Here are some other popular examples:

KEY CHROMOPHORE        Absorption MAX (nm)  STRENGTH

acetylide                                    177                           medium
aldehyde (2)                                210                           strong
anthracene                                 252 & 375                strong
azido                                          190                           medium
amine                                         195                           weak
benzene                                     184 & 255                strong
β-carotene                                  450                          medium
disulfide                                      194                          medium
ether                                           185                           weak
ethylene                                     190                           medium
ketone (2)                                   190                           weak
naphthalane                              220 & 286                strong
nitrate                                        270                           weak-strong
nitrite                                         225                           weak
nitro                                           210                           strong
oxime                                         190                           medium
thiol                                            195                           weak
thioketone                                  205                           strong
thioether                                     194                           medium
conjugated ring                        varies                          strong

Notes: 

1. Chromophore conjugation is the process that gives rise to multiple spectral peaks (or shoulders) which are very useful in qualitative identification for HPLC (Spectral fingerprinting). For more information on this topic, I recommend a very well written description of UV/VIS spectroscopy fundamentals at this link.
2. Other interesting examples: Carbonyl (aldehyde) as found in Acetaldehyde; 293nm. Carbonyl (ketone) such as found in Acetone; 271nm.

Data supplied from "Instrumental Methods of Analysis"; Willard, Merritt & Dean; D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc., (1965).

External (ESTD) vs. Internal Standard (ISTD) Calibration in HPLC

Reliable quantitation of sample analytes using HPLC analysis requires accurate and reliable quantitation of a standard(s). For chromatography applications, we commonly use either an External Standard or an Internal Standard, as applicable, to insure reliable quantification of the sample.

• NOTE: A quick comment about calibration methods. Before you begin to create any calibration tables or analyze any standards/samples, please make sure that your current chromatography method follows good chromatography fundamentals. It must be selective for the sample type, retain the compound(s) with good K prime values, be reproducible and resolve apart all of the samples and possible impurities with near to perfectly symmetrical peak shapes. Your calibration results will only be as good as your original method. A poor quality method may not provide reliable results so be sure and spend as much time as possible developing the initial HPLC method to be as rugged and reliable as possible before starting any quantitation or calibration. *Poor quality method development is the number one reason for problems with quantitation.

Methods of Quantitation, Peak-height vs. Peak-area: Both types of response provide a measurement of the detector signal output. Proper and reproducible integration of the signal output is critical. Peak area is the most popular choice in chromatography, but peak height measurements can also be used if the peaks have near perfect symmetry (very rare, so peak area is far more reliable for integration). Whichever method you chose, you must use it consistently and document it well.

Definitions, External & Internal Standards: For most samples, there are two commonly used types of standards used. When known standards are run separately from the actual samples (in their own chromatogram) and their response is compared to that of the sample in another chromatogram, then we refer to this as an External Standard (ESTD). When the standard is added to the sample and analyzed at the same time we refer to this as an Internal Standard (ISTD). With an Internal Standard we are comparing the instrument's response to the sample to a reference standard with similar response characteristics, both run together.

External Standard (ESTD) Calibration Notes: The sample must fall within a range bracketed by the calibration solution. I suggest that you include a range which covers concentration values which are ~ 50% or more outside of the expected range. Dissolve the final calibration standards into the mobile phase (or a weaker solution) when preparing the injection vials from the stock solution. At least five (5) different concentration values should be used per order-of-magnitude (larger range = more stds). *Inject the same volume of solution (different concentration) for each calibration standard point ("level") onto the column. Do Not inject different volumes of solution from one std vial to create different concentrations. Plot peak response vs concentration. Ideally, you should have a linear response and the line will go through the origin (true zero intercept, ideally, though matrix effects/or the use on non std detectors such as the ELSD or CAD may require complex curve fits/formulas to describe the response). Once you have injected all of the standards, repeat the process again at least three more times (or use multiple injections) to determine overall reproducibility before constructing the final calibration table.

Internal Standard (ISTD) Calibration Notes: Internal standards are commonly used when many sample preparation steps are required before the sample can be injected onto the column. The internal standard may compensate for any losses during filtration or extraction. Selection of the Internal Standard is critical. Some of the characteristics of a good ISTD should include: It must be different than the sample, well resolved and must not elute where any sample peaks could be expected; It should not elute where any interfering matrix or other compounds could appear; It should have a similar linear response as the sample (Inject a fixed volume/concentration); Available in a high purity form from one or more commercial sources (certified method); Must be stable and not react with the sample or mobile phase solution. 

Add it to the samples before any extraction procedures. Base the amount of ISTD concentration such that it is between 1/3 and 1/2 of the expected concentration of the sample(s). The sample's target concentration range is a good value to use. *Because of these and other strict conditions, finding a suitable Internal Standard can take some time and testing.

HPLC Maintenance & Repair Parts To Have on Hand for HPLC Systems

HPLC (UHPLC) systems are complex instruments which require periodic inspection, cleaning and maintenance. These tasks are critical to maintain the performance, reliability and accuracy of the instrument. If you have not done so already, I strongly recommend that you create formal standard operating procedures (SOP's) which address: (1) The frequency of when routine and non-routine maintenance procedures should be performed; (2) The types of maintenance and/or repair procedures used (e.g. piston seal replacement, A/I rotary valve seal replacement); (3) The exact step-by-step procedure to follow in performing these tasks and (4) The Performance Verification or Qualification steps and procedures which are to be performed to verify that any repairs made have been done correctly. *An instrument log book should be employed to document these procedures over time.

Periodic "General Maintenance" of the HPLC is one type of service procedure which should be scheduled at a set frequency (Example: Every 6 months) and will serve to provide a time to clean, inspect and repair/replace any parts which are worn due to normal use. Such routine HPLC maintenance is often referred to as a basic "Preventative Maintenance" service (or "PM Service"). Spare parts common to your HPLC system(s) should be on hand to perform these scheduled maintenance procedures as part of a normal PM service.

Here is a list of common parts that should be on hand for a "typical" HPLC system used in a pharmaceutical laboratory. Please consult the appropriate manufacture's product literature to determine the correct parts needed for your own HPLC system. This list is presented as a general guideline only:

• Capillary tubing, fittings (nuts and ferrules): Assorted fittings, usually made of 316 Stainless Steel, but could be made of polymeric materials. Always have spare precut and polished chromatography tubing of appropriate I.D. and lengths for use with your HPLC available at all times. Insure that the nuts and ferrules used are appropriate for your brand of HPLC system and the columns used as different manufacturers have different specifications for their fittings and ferrules. Many types are not interchangeable.

• Detector Lamps: At least one spare bulb of a type designed for your specific detector should be on hand. Note that some detectors use multiple lamps so you may need to have more than one type available for each detector. Some lamp bulb types (e.g. tungsten) can be safely stored and last for several years while other types, such as Deuterium bulbs, loose substantial energy after as little as 6 months. If you have several detectors of the exact same design, then there is often no need to stock multiple replacement bulbs for each one. Instead, stock enough bulbs to service one detector as it is unlikely you would see failure of more than one detector on the same day (an exception to this guideline is if you perform PM services on all of the instruments at the same time, then you may want to have multiple bulbs available).

• Pump Pistons: One set of spare new pistons should be kept on hand for each pump module. As with lamp bulbs, if you have several identical pumps, then there is often no need to stock multiple sets of pistons for each one. Stock only as many as you expect to use in one year. Clean and inspect the pistons during each PM for any signs of scratches or surface abrasions. Under routine use, pistons should only require general cleaning and last a long time before replacement is required (> 1 year). Mobile phases which contain high concentrations of salt buffers often accelerate this wear requiring more frequent replacement. *Always install new piston seals when replacing pistons.

• Pump Piston Seals: At least one set of spare new piston seals should be on hand for each pump module. Seals wear out more frequently than pistons. You should go through two or more sets of piston seals before you need to replace the pistons. If the piston seals leak, inspect the pistons for wear (replace with new ones or clean and reuse) and install new piston seals. Mobile phases which contain high concentrations of salt buffers often accelerate this wear.

• Solvent Pickup Filters: These are the large particle filters which sit inside your solvent or mobile phase bottles. They are often made from stainless steel or sintered glass with porous inlets (~10 to 30 micron) and can clog or become fouled over time (esp. when used with aqueous buffers). In some cases these can be cleaned using sonication (not sintered glass filters, only steel or polymeric!). Note: Sometimes it is most cost effective to replace them with new filters then clean and re-use them.

• Inline Frits/Filters: You may have an inline filter placed after your PUMP head, but before the column inlet to collect any remaining particulate matter. These filters can extend the lifetime of the entire HPLC system (esp. the A/S, A/I and Column), but will only do so if changed on a regular basis. Some manufacturers incorporate this type of filter into the design of their pump modules. An example of this can be found on the HP/Agilent brand model 1050, 1100 and/or 1200-series pumps. These have an inexpensive 10 micron PTFE frit installed in the outlet valve of the pump. This filter catches all of the normally occurring piston seal debris and larger mobile phase particles and should be changed every month. Other pre-filters are installed in cartridges just before the column inlet. These often overlooked pre-filters filters must be replaced about once each month to do their job properly. Keep plenty of spare filters on hand.

• Auto-injector Rotary Valve Seals: If you have an auto-injector, then a high pressure valve is probably used to switch the sample into the flow path for analysis. This valve will have one or more parts which require regular inspection, cleaning and periodic replacement. Mobile phases which contain high concentrations of salt buffers often accelerate this wear. The valve rotor seal is the most common part which requires replacement.

• Auto-Sampler Needle: A needle should last a very long time, but depending on the frequency of use and type of vial septa encountered it can require replacement at regular intervals. A good general guideline would be to keep one spare needle on hand for every 2-4 systems.

• Auto-Sampler Needle Seat: The needle seat often requires more frequent replacement than the needle due to repeated mechanical wear. A good general guideline would be to keep one spare needle seat on hand for each system.

• UV/VIS Detector Flow Cell: While not actually a required PM spare part, this one is worthwhile to have. If you employ a UV/VIS flow cell, then I always suggest you keep one dedicated spare flow cell on hand which matches the size and volume of the type you use in your instrument. A spare flow cell can prove to be very valuable as a troubleshooting tool if you believe that you have contaminated or clogged your current flow cell. A quick swap can answer the question and get you back to work quickly saving hours or days of lost time. *Note: This extra flow cell should be kept separate from all instruments for use as a tested spare only and not used for regular analysis.

If you have suggestions for other types of common HPLC spares to add to the list or to have on hand, then please let me know.

Method Development Hint: Use your HPLC Diode Array Detector (DAD or PDA) as a Spectrophotometer

One of the many useful features of a UV/VIS scanning diode array detector is that it can be employed in flow injection mode to scan a sample and provide you with some useful data about the absorbance characteristics of the sample (which probably contains a mixture of components). Unlike a spectrophotometer, you only need about 1 ul of sample instead of a 1ml cuvette and only 15-20 seconds of time to gather the data.

Why do this? I use this feature often when I receive a new and unfamiliar sample for method development. I set up the detector to scan and store all wavelengths, in steps of 2nm, from 210nm to 450nm and inject the sample in flow injection mode (that means no-column is present and I easily do this using the By-Pass position on my column selector). In a very short amount of time I can view the resulting spectra of the sample which aids me in selecting the initial discreet wavelengths to monitor. For example: If I notice that the sample shows some absorbance at 410nm using the flow injection run, then notice while developing the analysis method that none of the peaks seen show absorbance near 410nm, then I can assume that I may still have some components retained on the column.

Setup Hints:
(1) For this to work well, you should have a high performance, low volume switching valve or automated column selection system (e.g. The LC Spiderling Column Selection System) installed so you can easily by-pass your column (otherwise, remove your column and place a high pressure, low volume union in its place).
(2) Set the diode array detector to a high sampling rate because the sample is going to fly through the flow cell quickly. Use a sampling rate that is faster than you would use if a column was there to disperse the sample and slow down the peaks.
(3) Choose a wide range of wavelengths to scan and store. If the sample appears colorless to the eye in solution and I am running in a UV transparent solvent such as acetonitrile, then I often use a range of 210 to 450nm.

Proper Wavelength Selection for HPLC Method Development (or Purity Determination)

Selecting the best HPLC wavelength(s) to monitor during an analysis method for use in quantitation and/or purity determination requires both knowledge and careful attention. Here is the basic procedure to use:

Step 1. Create the Method. To determine which UV/VIS detector wavelength(s) should be chosen for the analysis of your sample, you will first need to create a general HPLC Method which retains and resolves the compound(s) of interest on the column (goal is a K prime of >2.0, less than 10.0). Be sure and utilize a scanning diode array detector in full scan mode (often referred to as a photo-diode array detector, PDA or DAD) to scan all relevant wavelengths of your samples (e.g. 210 to 450nm). Note: Your choice of mobile phase and detector settings will effect the S/N values.

Step 2. Determine the lambda max of the sample's spectra using the Data analysis software. Once you have completed the analysis, review the spectral data to determine which prominent peak wavelengths have the maximum signal to noise (S/N) ratio. These “peaks” can be used as the individual wavelengths for integration and purity determination. By sure and double check that any detector options which use a “reference wavelength" are turned ‘OFF’ when running these methods (more info on “reference wavelengths” can be found on this blog in another post). With the wavelength selected, chose an appropriate bandwidth for use (narrow).

Step 3. Edit the HPLC method to use the discreet wavelengths found in step 2. Whenever you run a real sample, continue to use the full scanning mode of the detector so you will know about any other components which absorb at wavelengths far away from and/or near the peak wavelengths. These compounds can add or subtract signal from the main peak making it appear to be more or less concentrated (or more or less pure) than it actually is. If you only monitored the sample with a single wavelength detector, then you would miss this vital information and make errors in your purity or concentration determinations.

Conclusion. (1) Using a multi-wavelength, scanning HPLC detector such as a DAD is one of the most important tools you can use to create accurate and reliable chromatography methods. Always use a scanning DAD for method development to prevent errors. (2) Learning how to correctly use and set up the detector's settings, parameters, special features and options may prevent false or misleading results. Only after you have developed a reliable and repeatable method with good sample retention and peak shape can you begin to report accurate integration and concentration values (and/or make UV/VIS "purity" determinations).

Determining the Data Acquisition Rate (Sampling Rate) For Your HPLC Detector

Another common question I am asked is how to set-up the HPLC detector’s sampling rate. This article is specific to commonly used UV/VIS, not mass selective detectors (Mass Spectrometer detectors are set-up in a similar manner, but you also want to take into account the numbers of MRM transitions for each peak and dwell time to account for the scanning delay. Typical values for MS are >10 points with 15-20 being best). 

Most HPLC (UHPLC) instrument manufacturer’s provide default sampling rate values within their software packages. Please do not use them as the values shown were just put there to fill in the data field and may not apply to your application or method. Many chromatographer's use these values without first understanding if they are appropriate for their own methods. This is a common mistake. Just as the manufacturer does not know what wavelength, flow rate or mobile phase you will use, they also do not know what sample(s), method and/or conditions are appropriate for your specific application. As such, they provide numerous default values in these data entry fields to satisfy the software's requirement. Just as you select an appropriate wavelength and bandwidth, you should always calculate and enter the correct detector data acquisition rate value yourself which is appropriate for your specific application, detector type and method. 

The Peak shape's role during integration: For each chromatographic analysis you must determine the optimum sampling rate for the chosen detector. An accurate value is critical for proper instrument set-up, quantification and integration of your sample(s) peaks. In the most basic sense, the area under a perfectly Gaussian peak requires at least ten points to describe it with some detail. Ten points will provide basic data about the shape of an ideal peak to the computer. Since peaks are rarely perfectly symmetrical, a larger number of points will provide more accurate integration of the peak’s actual shape and total area. This will improve run-to-run reproducibility and quantification. We suggest you include twenty to thirty data points to allow for a more detailed fit to the peak. Too few points across a peak and you lose detail and sacrifice reproducibility. Too many points and you start to introduce noise into the system. 


With these facts in mind we can next think about calculating the detector’s data acquisition rate. You must select a data rate (sampling rate) that is sure to provide the recommended 20 to 30 data points across the peak width (we use the commonly calculated peak width at half height as the time measurement). Select a detector sampling rate that will provide you with this degree of detail and resolution. This is best accomplished by initially looking at an actual chromatogram of your sample. Look at the chromatogram and use the narrowest sample or standard peak past the void time, with good retention as an example to determine the best acquisition rate. The narrowest peak will be the worst-case scenario and will insure that you have enough points across all of the remaining peaks in the sample. It's width is often measured in units of time (seconds/minutes). This data can often be read directly off of a generated data acquisition report.

Examples:

(a) If your narrowest peak has a peak width of 1.00 minute (60 seconds), then divide 30 points into 60 seconds for a result of 2 seconds per data point. The preferred sampling rate would be 2 seconds, 0.03 minutes or 0.5 Hz (depending on the units used by your detector).

(b) If your narrowest peak has a peak width of 0.20 minutes (12 seconds), then divide 30 points into 12 seconds  for a result of 0.4 seconds per data point. This equals a sampling rate of 2.5 samples per second or 2.5 Hz.

Summary:  

     To Determine the Data Acquisition Rate For Your Detector You Need To:

• Calculate the best data rate for each method and not use a generalized value (though similar methods will often use the same rate).
• Use your existing sample integration data results to identify the narrowest chromatographic peak in your analysis (at the baseline or half-height).
• Record the width value of this peak (usually in units of time).
• Divide this number by thirty (30) to determine the preferred sampling rate.
• Use this value, or a value close to it, for your detector’s sampling rate.

UV / VIS, VWD, DAD, PDA HPLC DETECTOR SIGNAL BANDWIDTH (bw) SELECTION

Modern chromatography UV/VIS detectors offer the operator a choice of one to several hundred different signal wavelength choices (as is the case for Diode Array Detectors). Besides being able to specify a single wavelength, you can often choose a signal BANDWIDTH (bw) to associate with each wavelength [e.g. for a 280 nm signal with 10 nm bandwidth. This is often written as: 280 (10) or [280:10]. In many detectors, Signal Bandwidth is a variable, not fixed and represents the total number of nanometers across the specified signal value chosen. For example: If you select a signal wavelength of 280 nm and choose a bandwidth value of 10 nm, then you are actually gathering all signal data between 275 nm and 285 nm (5 nm to the left of the apex and 5 nm to the right for a total of 10 nm). Using a narrow bandwidth has the advantage of increasing the signal selectivity of the detector as you are only collecting data within a tight window. If you were to increase the bandwidth to 60 nm in the same example you would now be collecting data between 250 nm and 310 nm. The additional data collected over this wider range may reduce the total noise (by averaging it over a wide range), improve the S/N ratio (which may increase sensitivity), but it also reduces the selectivity. Large bandwidths also increase the chance you may include peak signal data from other co-eluting components into your signal data. You must select a bandwidth range for each signal wavelength which is located 'safely' away from any other potentially interfering peak. As with many things in life, balance is important. In this case, bandwidth choice is the balance between selectivity and sensitivity.

• When developing new methods we recommend that you choose an initial bandwidth value of 10 nm for each signal. This provides a nice balance between selectivity and sensitivity. It is also a common bandwidth value used on many older UV/VIS detectors which have a fixed signal bandwidth (such as many single or variable wavelength detectors).

• If you have determined the exact signal maximum for your sample and you would like to gain additional sensitivity for your sample (and thus decrease selectivity), re-run the analysis using several different, but increasing signal bandwidth values (e.g. 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 nm). Choose bw values that are safely within the range of the detector, within the limits of the mobile phase's absorption region and also away from any potential co-eluting peaks. *To confirm which value is best, be sure and calculate the actual measured signal to noise ratio of the peak of interest after each analysis. This is a critical step! Do not be fooled by increases in the peak height or area alone as these changes are not always synonymous with better signal to noise ratios. Only by measuring the actual baseline noise level for each run and comparing it with the actual peak signal obtained will you be able to determine if increasing the bandwidth has provided you with better noise reduction and signal strength.

• To increase spectral signal selectivity choose a bw value that is very narrow. A value such as 2 or 4 nm would allow the detector to collect only signal data that is at or near the apex of your selected wavelength. This can be very useful when trying to discriminate your signal from nearby signal peaks, especially at low wavelengths such as 210 nm.

• When reporting your method conditions always include the wavelength AND bandwidth used for each signal. In order to accurately reproduce your method, this information is needed. *The flow cell dimensions, wavelength and bandwidth should always be included in your method.

HPLC Flow Cell Volume & Path Length:

Modern UV/VIS detectors offer several different flow cell options. The option(s) you select can make a big difference in the level of signal sensitivity, sample dispersion and response you obtain. If you fail to note which type of HPLC flow cell you use in a particular system, then you may discover some problems when transferring a method to a different instrument. Always record the flow cell volume and path length used as part of your method description. 

Flow Cells Usually Differ In Three Ways:

(1) Maximum Rated Back-pressure;

(2) Flow Cell Volume and

(3) Flow Cell Path length. 

Let’s take a look at these in more detail.

• Maximum Rated Back-pressure: Unless the detector is in series with another detector, column or has a back-pressure regulator on it, the expected back-pressure on a typical flow cell’s outlet is just about one bar as it usually is directed to an open waste line. *This topic will be discussed in more detail in the future as part of another “hint and tip” topic. Today we are more concerned about the remaining two options:

• Flow Cell Volume: Analytical flow cells are commonly offered in nl to ul sizes. Depending on your instrument setup, column and sample(s), one flow cell volume may make more sense than another. After you have spent time separating and concentrating the peak of interest into a tiny volume you do not want to elute it off the column and mix it with another peak because the cell volume is too large. Ideal cell volume is a compromise between sample dispersion and sensitivity. The best choice will be determined mostly by the actual peak volume of your separated sample. The general rule is that your flow cell volume should be no larger than 10% of your peak volume and ideally ~ 2.5% (a 1:40 ratio), but there are some exceptions to this rule. When in doubt, experiment with different cells and do not forget to consider the total volume of all the connecting tubing and valves in your system as these contribute to many issues when the column volume decreases (such as when using mini or narrow bore columns are used). Some common analytical cell volumes offered by various manufacturers are 2 ul, 6 ul and 13 ul. For narrow bore columns (~ 2.1mm ID) a smaller cell volume (~ 2 ul) will result in less sample dispersion, while a larger cell volume may increase overall sensitivity (esp. when used with a longer path length). Mid-bore or Mid-Size columns (2.1 to 4.6mm ID) often are best suited to cell volumes around 6 ul to minimize dispersion and still provide good sensitivity. Larger flow cells such as the common 13ul size often have longer path lengths which can be used to enhance sensitivity. Standard 4.6mm ID columns often benefit from a 13ul volume cell to provide maximum sensitivity with less concern for dispersion effects when larger columns are used (e.g. 4.6 x 250mm). Keep in mind that these are general guidelines only. Most samples contain many peaks of varying width & volume, so you will need to select the cell volume that is optimized to most of the peaks found in your sample.

• Flow Cell Path Length: The flow cell’s path length affects the intensity of light reaching the detector (Beer-Lambert law). For the same volume of sample, the apparent concentration of the sample will appear to be higher if the path length is longer. There is no established standard for ‘path length’ so it is important that you always known what the path length of each flow cell is in your detector (10 mm is very common). Just as volumes vary, manufacturer’s offer different flow cells with varying path lengths. Even identical detectors can use flow cells with identical volumes, but have different path lengths. When comparing the analysis results obtained from two different instruments, always make note of the flow cell dimensions used in each instrument. If the method is to be accurately reproduced on a second system, then the flow cells used should have the same geometry (volume and path length). One way that the difference in path length can be used to enhance sensitivity of an existing method is to use a flow cell with a longer optical path length. For example, if your current flow cell has a path length of 6 mm you could replace it with one having a longer path length of 10 mm. This would increase the sample peak response (as more light would be absorbed) in your method. *This fact can be useful to squeeze out additional sensitivity in a method and often does not require any change of column or conditions.

REFERENCE WAVELENGTHS (as used in HPLC UV/VIS):

One of the most common problems that I see as a consultant in laboratories which use chromatography for sample analysis relates to how to choose appropriate settings for the modern UV/VIS detectors. In addition to selecting scientifically appropriate UV/VIS wavelength(s) and Bandwidth signal values, selecting one optional feature may invalidate an entire HPLC method. This software feature, found in many Multi-Wavelength and Scanning Diode Array UV/VIS detectors (aka: "DAD" or a "PDA") is known as the “ReferenceWavelength” .

• Please do not confuse this specific software feature ("Reference Wavelength") with the initial reference scan ('zero') which the detector takes at the start of the analysis and is subtracted from your desired signal to show only one initial signal plot (and which is used as the initial signal value to compare to the measured signal during the rest of the analysis run. This is usually known as "zeroing" the detector and occurs just once, at the start of each run. When you manually press the 'Auto-zero', you are adjusting the displayed signal plot to a know reference point (often 0.0 volts). This is a one-time zero of the signal and has nothing to do with the special software feature we discuss in this article.

"Reference Wavelength" [Usually written as: Signal Wavelength/Bandwidth: Ref Wavelength/Bandwidth]. Most manufacturers of advanced HPLC UV/VIS (esp. DAD/PDA) detectors provide this extra software feature in their chromatography software, but its use and function are a mystery to most chromatographers. As with all advanced features, proper training is required to understand and use them successfully. Using advanced features without proper training can result in analysis errors, invalid methods and perhaps very expensive product recalls.

Allow me to provide a brief explanation of the “Reference Wavelength” software feature as seen and used with many DAD and/or PDA detectors (e.g. HP/Agilent and Waters brand HPLC systems).

If you are running a gradient analysis, then the change in solvent properties (RI and light absorption/transmission) and temperature over time can cause noticeable baseline drift during the run. This drift up or down relative to the starting baseline reference point is normal, but may cause a number of quantification problems with the analysis reporting software (as flat baselines are more easily and accurately integrated than sloped ones). 

Two scientifically correct methods were developed to deal with this slippery slope of a problem. Each proposed method has some limitations, but if optimized can improve the quality of the resulting baseline (flatter, allowing for better peak integration) and preserve the original acquired signal data for compliance.

(Method # 1) Run the same method again, but this time with no sample (a blank of mobile phase) and subtract the resulting signal to produce a "blank subtracted run". This preserves the original data and removes the observed drift from the resulting signal ('A' - 'B'  = 'C'), but due to the time difference between injections, you are unable to confirm if anything has changed between the time of the first and second injection. It is not perfect.

(Method # 2) Set up the detector to collect a second channel of data (2nd wavelength signal) that is close to the original wavelength selection, BUT far enough away from the original signal such that it will not overlap any of the peak spectra of interest or other compounds in the sample. This is tricky as you want it close enough to show the drift, but far enough away to not show any sample signal. If selected carefully, it can be used as a pseudo blank run for post-run baseline subtraction. You can then subtract the second acquired ‘blank’ signal run from your original signal run and the resulting chromatogram should have a flatter baseline (less drift) for quantification purposes. With this method, two separate signals, 'A' and 'B', are collected at the same time (this is the key). A third, baseline subtracted signal, 'C', can be generated from them. This method preserves the raw data obtained from all three signals (i.e. Original, Secondary, and Subtracted signals). The benefit of this method is that the signals are all acquired using the same time base (unlike Method #1).

Using the concept of Method # 2 described above, many HPLC manufactures added a software feature known as a the ‘Reference Wavelength’ to their systems. This feature allowed a chromatographer to include with each signal choice, 'A', a second wavelength value, 'B', (and bandwidth) as part of the method which would be used to subtract out raw data from the primary wavelength during the analysis. This subtraction occurs in real-time, on your raw data gathered from the detector and the resulting data reported to the user is in fact the result of the subtraction only. The original signal data is destroyed. You will never know what the original data looked like before the reference wavelength was subtracted from it (it has been destroyed). Only the newly manipulated (subtracted) result is provided, 'C'. If any sample peak(s) or impurities appeared in the region where you selected a reference wavelength/bandwidth, then the resulting data would have been subtracted from your actual sample and you would never know it happened or have any record of it! This brings up a serious validation issue as you are modifying the original data with no way of knowing (or documenting) how you have changed it. It is for this reason alone that we teach chromatographers to always turn this feature 'OFF' by default. If they want to make use of the feature, then we suggest that they simultaneously collect data from a second, separate wavelength channel such that the two raw data streams are preserved for validation purposes (Method # 2). IOW: To acquire scientifically useful data, turn 'OFF' the Reference Wavelength software feature and record all of the signal data. The separate signals can be compared, subtracted or manipulated as needed for integration and reporting purposes, but the original signal sample data, 'A', is left unchanged and secure. This allows you to monitor for contamination, impurities, problems or changes during the run. It also allows others to verify your method for accuracy.

Observational Notes:  I am often called in to diagnose what the client's refer to as 'a strange problem' where the area of a known sample peak changes in an unexpected way. That "way" often includes going NEGATIVE, below the baseline. Or even increasing in area, mass or decreasing in mass.The column is clean, pumps work fine, retention times are stable and everything appears to be working fine. *This anomaly is due to the reference wavelength software feature being turned 'ON' and another compound (peak) absorbing in the user selected Reference bandwidth region. Its absorption contributes to the final signal. If the data collected (area) for the 'reference peak' is larger than the sample peak the resulting chromatogram will show a negative peak (this tends to be noticed by most users as it is illogical and indicates a serious problem!), whereas if the reference peak is smaller than the sample peak, the resulting area signal decreases, which may or may not be noticed (incorrectly interpreted as a lower concentration sample). You can see the obvious danger posed by this situation. Companies can be put in a situation where all of their past data is found to be invalid and product recalls may result from this finding. The cause is directly related to a lack of understanding and proper training in the use of the software and/or HPLC system.

 
How to Solve The Problem: The reason we see this feature cause so many problems in laboratories appears to be due to the fact that the Reference Wavelength software feature is being turned 'ON' by default in the software for most DAD/ PDA modules (The real default value for "Reference Wavelength" should always be: 'OFF', not on).  To make matters worse, the default values for the wavelength and bandwidths often supplied by the manufacturers are actually used by most chromatographers (what are the odds that the random values placed in the system are even relevant to your analysis? Why would you use them?). We suggest using a ‘canned’ method template in most laboratories which includes a new default value for this feature... 'OFF' for all analysis methods. Most importantly of all, please obtain formal training in the use of a specialty detector such as a diode-array detector before using one for sample analysis.

Notes

1. The bandwidth chosen for each wavelength is also very important and if chosen poorly, can result in adding noise to your signal, reducing it or even enhancing it. Please refer to this article for more info: http://hplctips.blogspot.com/2011/09/uv-vis-hplc-detector-signal-bandwidth.html 
2. If you are still running HPLC methods with the “Reference Wavelength” turned 'ON' while awaiting approval to turn it 'OFF', then you can ADD additional signals to your method with the same primary settings as before, but with “Reference Wavelength” now set to 'OFF'. Adding the same signal w/o the “Reference Wavelength” will provide you with the original signal data for future comparison to the "collected/modified" signal (allowing you to see if the data was changed). Make sure you configure these extra channels to be saved with the analysis.