Backpressure Changes, Pressure Drop from HPLC Tubing Selection (0.007, 0.005, 0.010")

In previous articles we have discussed how the choice of column particle size directly changes the system backpressure. Smaller particles generate higher back-pressures. We have also discussed the importance of HPLC tubing selection to minimize delay volume and diffusion within the HPLC's laminar flow path. Let us now focus on how the tubing's internal diameter and length impacts the total HPLC back-pressure (or pressure drop) observed. 

Key Points:  

1. Try to optimize the plumbing of your HPLC system.  
2. HPLC Tubing lengths between connections (or HPLC modules) should always be as short as possible. 
3. Pressure drop is dependent on the tubing length and inner diameter. Doubling the inner diameter of the tubing will decrease the pressure by a factor of 16.

Once the HPLC tubing connection lengths have been minimized, the next critical dimension which affects band broadening, delay volume and peak-width is the internal diameter (ID) of the tubing. The tubing selected should be narrow enough to reduce the undesirable spread of the peak(s) inside the tubing, but not be so narrow or restricted to result in clogs or obstructions (which is why good chromatography guidelines should be followed insuring that each sample is fully dissolved and filtered before injection). Commonly used tubing ID’s for most analytical HPLC systems are: 0.010” (0.25 mm), 0.007” (0.17 mm) or 0.005” (0.12 mm). By far, 0.007” (0.17 mm) is the most commonly used size for modern analytical HPLC analysis as it offers a compromise between low delay-volume and modest back-pressure (with fewer clogs). However, in addition to the much lower internal volumes which accompany the narrower ID’s, the pressure drop measured across equivalent lengths of tubing may change dramatically and this should be noted during set-up, selection and operation. Take the time to learn what "normal" backpressures are under specified conditions.

 

Understanding how the HPLC system backpressure changes as the internal diameter of the tubing varies is extremely useful in troubleshooting a number of common HPLC problems.

Let us compare the pressure drops measured across three popular HPLC tubing ID’s of the same length (40 cm) using common HPLC mobile phase solvents. This table will help illustrate the observed backpressure changes that the tubing ID and liquid have on the pressure drop.

PRESSURE DROP (in bars):

SS Capillary Tubing, 40 cm length, flow rate 1.000 mL/min.

Mobile Phase / Tubing ID	Water	ACN	MeOH	MeOH/Water (1:1)	IPA
0.010” (0.25 mm)	0.7	0.2	0.4	1.2	1.5
0.007” (0.17 mm)	2.7	1.0	1.6	5.1	6.2
0.005” (0.12 mm)	10.4	4.0	6.3	19.1	24

Note: Pressure drop is also a function of tubing length so if we halve (1/2) the length of tubing used, we also will reduce the pressure drop by one-half. 

Note the four-fold change that narrowing the tubing ID has at each ID reduction. The change is more dramatic when viscous solutions are used (i.e. MeOH/Water or IPA). If you re-plumb any part of your HPLC system with new tubing, then awareness of this physical change will assist you in troubleshooting many types of HPLC problems (to know which types of pressure changes indicate a real problem and which types of pressure changes are normal). Changes to the overall length or ID may result in noticeable changes to the total system backpressure. As an experienced chromatographer knows, when HPLC solvents are mixed together (e.g. gradient analysis) the pressure does NOT always follow a linear progression. In some cases, a reaction occurs between the solutions resulting in an overall change to the final viscosity of the mixture which may not be expected or understood by novice chromatographers (e.g. mixtures of MeOH/Water and ACN/Water are very well know examples which show these properties). 

 

You can download a free, more detailed table of 'HPLC Tubing Backpressure Examples' in PDF Format at this link:

HPLC Detector Optical SLIT WIDTH Selection

A few notes on HPLC Optical Slit Width selection:

   Notes: 

1. The chosen slit width setting determines the amount of light which is directed to the detector.
2. For most HPLC methods, a slit width value of 4 nm is suggested. 
3. Bandwidth should be set at least as wide as the optical slit width.

Characteristics of Narrow Optical Slit Widths:

• Less light falls on the detector
• Less signal intensity
• Increased baseline noise
• S/N ratio decreases
• Spectral resolution improves which allows for more accurate spectral identification.

Characteristics of Wide Optical Slit Widths:

• More light falls on the detector
• Greater signal intensity
• Decreased baseline noise 
• S/N ratio improves
• Spectral resolution decreases and detail is lost. Less accurate spectral identification and an increase in errors for spectral library matching.

Syringe Filter Selection for HPLC or LC/MS samples

This article will address the use of disposable female, Luer-compatible, syringe filters without built-in pre-filters for the filtration of individual samples into vials for HPLC or LC/MS analysis. - Note: 96 or 384 multi-well filtering plates provide for a better solution when large quantities of samples need to be filtered. Note: The presented filter membrane material selection criteria also applies to mobile phase filtration too.

The choice of syringe filter depends on the: filter size (volume) of your sample, the chemical compatibility of the housing and membrane and desired pore size. Selection of the wrong filter size can result in too much sample holdup volume (loss of sample on filter) or overloading of the filter (allowing unfiltered material to pass through). If a membrane or housing is chosen which is not chemically compatible with your solution, then contamination of the sample or rupture of the assembly can result. Choosing a filter with too large a pore size can result in material passing through it which could clog or contaminate the solution (i.e. plug an HPLC system or result in a loss of sterility of a solution). Protein binding affinity is another characteristic of filter membranes and if you are filtering samples of biological interest, then you will also want to consider this specification in your selection criteria too (though it will not be discussed in this article).

Syringe Filter Size:

Filters are available in a variety of sizes which are generally in a disc shape and described by their diameter. Common sizes available for chromatography samples include: 3 mm, 4 mm, 13 mm and 25 mm (~25 - 30 mm) diameter discs. The larger the diameter of the disc, the larger the sample capacity, cross sectional surface area and potential hold-up volume of the sample on the filter. 

Hold-up volume is important because some of the sample will be retained inside the membrane and/or filter housing. If too large a filter is selected, samples with small volumes could be lost entirely in the hold-up volume on the membrane. Smaller filters have lower hold-up volumes. To extract as much sample as possible, be sure and use a post-filtration air purge to reduce the total hold-up volume.

If the volume of the sample you wish to filter is under 1 ml, then a 3 mm filter may provide the lowest hold-up volume and require the smallest amount of solution. To filter samples between 1 ml and 10 ml, the 13 mm diameter filter provides a good balance between hold-up volume and large filter surface area. Larger sample volumes from 5 ml to 50 ml are often filtered through the more common 25 mm diameter filters (~4 times the filtration area as a 13 mm disc).

Chemical Compatibility:

Membrane Material: This is where you really must consult the manufacturer’s own documentation for the most compatible filter membrane for both your sample and the solution that will flow through the filter. To simplify the selection criteria, we can make some generalizations about some of the different types available:

Cellulose Acetate (CA): Use with aqueous solutions and a few hydrocarbons only. Low protein binding so good for many biological samples. Not compatible with ACN or DMSO. Can be autoclaved.

Nylon: Great general purpose material and compatible with many HPLC solvents (including THF, alcohols, ACN), but not strong acids. Nylon has a high affinity to bind proteins. Can be autoclaved.

Polysulfone / Polyethersulfone Variants (PS / PES): Commonly used with tissue culture and ion chromatography samples. Stable with many strong bases and alcohols, but few HPLC solvents (as it is hydrophilic). Low backpressure and low protein binding. Not compatible with ACN. Can be autoclaved.

Polypropylene (PP): General purpose hydrophilic material with resistance to most acids, bases, DMF, DMSO and alcohols. Not recommended for use with hydrocarbons, esters or solvents such as ACN. Can be autoclaved.

Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF): Hydrophilic material with broad compatibility. Often a good choice for use with alcohols, hydrocarbons, biomolecules, ether and ACN. Low protein binding. Can be autoclaved.

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE): Reported in most brochures to be chemically resistant to almost all solvents, strong acids and bases. Hydrophobic membrane should be pre-wetted when used with aqueous solutions. Low protein binding and very strong. Can be autoclaved.

Most chromatography grade syringe filters are constructed of either HDPE or PP. These materials are compatible with a wide range of HPLC solvents and both offer low levels of extractables. HDPE has been reported to be more chemically compatible with aqueous basic solutions of NH4OH than PP.

Pore Size:

This will depend on your application and a number of different pore sizes are commonly available from vendors (1 micron, 0.8, 0.45 and 0.22 micron are the most common): 

For example, is sterilization of the fluid the goal? If so, a 0.22 micron filter is generally accepted as the best choice.  


For most chromatography or LC-MS applications either a 0.45 or 0.22 micron filters are preferred.

Summary:

• Please refer to the various manufacturers data sheets to select an appropriate syringe filter with: (1) a low hold-up volume; (2) large enough size for the volume of sample; (3) which is chemically compatible with the solution and material you are going to inject through it and (4) lowest protein binding affinity (if applicable).
   
• To reduce the hold-up volume, use a post-filtration air purge to empty the filter.
   
• Minimize contamination from extractables (in the plastic) by pre-rinsing the filter membrane with some of the clean solution. This can reduce the amount of detectable extractables in your sample. PTFE based membranes have some of the lowest extractable levels so consider their use if this is an issue.
   
• If analyte binding is a concern, select one of the membranes which has the lowest binding affinity such as PVDF or PTFE.