HPLC PEAK Fronting and Tailing, Common Reasons For It

All users of HPLC need to know and be familiar with the correct terms used to describe non-Gaussian shaped peaks. Two of the most common undesirable peak shapes, peaks that show "Fronting" and peaks that show "Tailing" indicate problems with the HPLC method.  A quick refresher on why you may observe an HPLC peak front or tail on the chromatogram follows. 

Peak FRONTING: First, let us define what peak fronting looks like. The leading edge (front) of the peak is vertical, straight up and non-Gaussian in shape. This sharp increase in signal is easy to spot. 

Common Reasons for Peak FRONTING:

• Poor sample/peak capacity. In other words, too low a K prime (not enough retention on the HPLC column) resulting in no chromatography taking place. To solve this problem you must develop a proper HPLC method which first retains the compound(s) of interest, holds them long enough to obtain an acceptable K prime and resolve them away from other peaks, then elutes them off the column.

• Injection Solution Too Strong:Your sample(s) should be dissolved in the mobile phase and not in a solution that is "stronger" in elution strength than the mobile phase. Example: If you method is 100% aqueous, do not inject the sample in a solution with organic solvent. Follow fundamental good chromatography guidelines.

• Column Fouling / Overloading of sample. When the HPLC column is overloaded with sample, the peak shape will show fronting. Decrease the injection volume and/or concentration, as appropriate, in 10x graduations until the peak shape is normal.

• Saturation of the Detector: Just as with overloading the column the peak shape may change, overloading the detector's measuring range may also result in saturation of the signal and loss of accuracy. Decrease the injection volume and/or concentration, as appropriate, in 10x graduations until the peak shape is normal and back on-scale.

Peak TAILING: First, let us define what peak tailing looks like. The trailing edge (tail) of the peak slowly drops off towards the baseline and  is non-Gaussian in shape. For those with GC experience it appears similar to a peak that "bleeds" and continues to interact with the column for an extended period of time.

Common Reasons for Peak TAILING:

• Flow path Diffusion (from extra-delay volume). Poorly swaged fittings/connectors, a column with a void, incorrectly sized capillary connection lines may all contribute to peak tailing. Optimize the flow path, column and connections.

• pH dependence for ionizable compounds. If the sample is easily ionized and the difference between the pka of the sample and the mobile phase is less than 2 pH unit, tailing may result. Being sure to work within a safe pH range for your column, increase or decrease the mobile phase pH to be > 2 pH units away from the sample's pka to reduce tailing.

• Type 'A' silica or heavy metal contamination of the support. Many older style column supports did not use ultra-pure, heavy metal free packing material. These material often interacted with the sample on the column resulting in changes in retention, The use of more modern type 'B' or 'C' packings has eliminated many of these problems.

• Residual silanol groups present on support. As with the earlier type 'A' supports, non fully end-capped supports with residual silanol groups often resulted in secondary, extended retention effects. Use of more modern, fully end-capped, ultra-high purity packing materials (and/or mobile phases which better address these residual groups) often allow Gaussian peak shapes without the need for many additives.

• Column Fouling / Overloading of sample. When a column is not washed of all retained material after each analysis, it may build up over time and change the surface chemistry of the support. This may lead to changes in retention, especially delays in both binding and elution. Wash, regenerate or replace the column to solve.

You may also be interested in reading a related article; "Two Common HPLC Problems and their Causes (Sudden changes to either the HPLC Backpressure or Peak Shape)".

Evaporative HPLC Detectors; CAD (Charged Aerosol Detector) and ELSD (Evaporative Light-Scattering Detector)

• If you wish to read about their development and/or operating principles, then please review the early published patents and many articles available through the web. Be cautious when reviewing any "sales" brochures or articles on these detectors as a great deal of misinformation may be found.

E.L.S.D. modules for HPLC applications were first developed and commercialized in early 1980. CAD units were first described ~ 2001 (US patent 6,568,24) and commercialized after 2004. Both types of evaporative detectors have undergone many updates over the years. They are complementary and focused on the same application areas where conventional UV/VIS detectors do not provide for or allow detection of specific compounds. While claimed limits of detection vary by manufacturer, both designs are highly sample and method dependent so fair comparisons are rare (sales literature is often very biased to make one system fail). Significant differences in cost between the two detectors are noteworthy, with CAD units currently costing several times as much as ELSD units. Let us take a look at some of the characteristics and uses of these very unusual niche detectors.

Applications: CAD and ELSD are both used with a wide range of non-volatile sample types. Targeted at compounds which have weak or no UV chromophore (e.g. Carbohydrates, fats, lipids, triglycerides, polymers, surfactants, oils).
 

Thousands of application notes and journal articles are available for both types of detectors (esp. for ELSD with almost 40 years of use) and a keyword search on the web is the best way to find them. As someone who was involved in the early development and design of these detectors, I have used them successfully to develop several hundred different types of methods. They have proven to be useful for a number of difficult applications, but their higher cost and even higher training and skill requirements still place them outside of most users labs. As with LC/MS detectors, CAD/ELSD modules may require far more maintenance and advanced training to use than most chromatographers have received. As such, it is my opinion that you consider their potential use in your projects only after other more conventional methods have failed to provide results. Due to the high level of training needed, difficulty to operate and maintain, high cost of operation and poor reproducibility, IMHO they should be a "last choice".

Detection: NOT “Universal” detectors (sourced to marketing misinformation from vendors and early academic reviews which over simplified their 'operation', not of the actual commercial instruments). While detection is partially based on the analyte’s chemical or physical properties, the actual output observed is in fact also based on the properties of the mobile phase (volatility and purity), sample volatility/stability and especially the many different custom detection settings chosen by the user (gas flow, heater temperatures, flow rate, specific detector used, level of contamination inside the detector). As such, their output is very subjective since it is based on both the specific chromatography method selected, the condition of the detector, the lab environment used-in, and the detailed operational settings chosen by the operator. They can detect everything from dirt, buffers, undissolved chemicals or particulate matter in your mobile phase. Even pressure changes on the detector's exhaust line can effect the output.

“Destructive” Detectors: As with an LC/MS system, the mobile phase is evaporated away from the sample and sample collection is not possible at the exhaust. They are best used as a secondary detector, with a primary detector sch as a UV/VIS module placed in front of the CAD/ELSD (to increase your chances of detecting something that the CAD or ELSD may miss). ELSD and CAD units will NOT detect all samples. If sample collection is required, a low volume, micrometer valve flow-splitter can be fitted to the evaporative detector’s inlet port. Note: Depending on the flow-splitter's split ratio, the detector’s signal output may be reduced.

Mobile Phase Requirements: Evaporative detectors require a fully volatile mobile phase (similar to LC/MS requirements). The use of non-volatile additives can contaminate or damage them (no phosphate buffers!). Use of non-volatile buffers or additives, low purity materials, contamination of the gas, mobile phase or by samples may result in excessive noise levels limiting detection. Use high-purity grades of mobile phase and additives. Examples of Mobile phases used: "Popular LC/MS and HPLC Volatile Mobile Phase Buffers"

Isocratic and Gradient Capable: Unlike RID or EC, CAD/ELSD allows the use of gradients and the use of UV obscuring solvents. Because the mobile phase is evaporated away, little to no baseline drift occurs during gradient analysis (often improving integration results). Sample types which dissolve best in solvents such as methylene chloride, acetone, chloroform or other strong UV absorbing solvents may find that these detectors assist in developing better quality methods. Reduced gradient baseline drift plus the option of using UV absorbing solvents are two characteristics which make them well suited to application areas such as lipids, polymers and oils. Flatter baselines allows for better quality peak integration.

Gas Requirements: Similar to the requirements of an electrospray LC/MS system, both CAD and ELSD modules use very large volumes of high-purity gas (i.e. Nitrogen) to safely evaporate the mobile phase away. Exhausting these large volumes of solvent vapor and gas into a fume hood is just as important during site prep. Be sure and factor these costs and the required space into any site-prep plan.

Operational Reproducibility and Method Transfer:  Recording the exact detector settings used in the method may not provide any guarantee of being able to duplicate the results obtained. No two instrument models are the same so results may vary (similar to LC/MS). Results obtained for each sample are relative to the specific instrument, the chosen settings & method used (again, much like LC/MS) and the internal condition of the detector used. Compare the many critical heat, gas flow and atomization related CAD/ELSD settings to the more common UV/VIS detector where only the wavelength, bandwidth and flow cell dimensions need to be specified to easily duplicate the detector setup. CAD/ELSD internal contamination levels, nebulizer spray patterns, gas flow rates, quality of the mobile phase and operator training may all contribute to variations. *As with all methods and detection systems, proper training and good method design will insure success.

Quantitation: Can be used for quantitative analysis across a wide dynamic range spanning multiple orders of magnitude with some success. High quality reproducible methods are achievable with both types of detectors, but will require calibration tables with many additional standards per order of magnitude.

Linearity and Output Characteristics: Except in the most narrow concentration ranges, neither detector is likely to provide a linear response. Different samples will need their own full calibration table and curve fit, per method. Quantitation can be improved through the use of larger numbers of calibration levels (more than normal) plus a high quality chromatography data analysis software package which includes many available non-linear curve fit options (polynomial, quadratic, sigmoidal, exponential, log…etc). Output often changes across orders of magnitude so be sure to optimize the curve fit for each sample type. Different sample types will often have different response outputs at different retention times. This is most easily observed during a gradient analysis. As the mobile phase composition changes, so does the response for EACH sample (this is NOT a UV/VIS detector).

Optimization Process:Unlike a UV/VIS or RID system which simply needs to warm up and stabilize, CAD and ELSD systems may require a methodical optimization process of adjusting the flow rate, gas flow and heating temperatures to optimize the measured S/N peak ratios for each sample and each method used (yes, ever one of them). Optimization of detection conditions usually involves making multiple measurements (Peak and Baseline S/N ratios) to find the best settings to use with each sample type and method. This optimization process is time consuming and changes may need to be made to the method over time as the detector fills up with baked-on sample material (changing the spray pattern via nebulization changes).

Operational Complexity: Methods which utilize CAD/ELSD systems may be more complicated and time consuming to learn, use and validate then conventional detectors. Specialized detector cleaning procedures are often needed. The detectors may become internally contaminated during use (sample builds up inside the unit). Failure to clean and maintain them may lead to high noise levels and/or inaccurate results. Due to the additional maintenance needs, lack of traditional linearity, and overall complexity, we recommend their use only when: (1) Conventional detectors or methods of analysis are not possible or unsatisfactory and (2) where the operator has demonstrated a high level of practical hands-on training through use of the detector and/or has sufficient experience (advanced level) in chromatography.

For more information:

•  “Advanced Evaporative Light-Scattering Detector (ELSD) For A Variety of HPLC Applications”;
• “Evaporative Light-Scattering Detector (ELSD) Optimization Procedure. Varex ELSD IIA, Technical Note # 0024”;

HPLC Detector Optical SLIT WIDTH Selection

A few notes on HPLC Optical Slit Width selection:

   Notes: 

1. The chosen slit width setting determines the amount of light which is directed to the detector.
2. For most HPLC methods, a slit width value of 4 nm is suggested. 
3. Bandwidth should be set at least as wide as the optical slit width.

Characteristics of Narrow Optical Slit Widths:

• Less light falls on the detector
• Less signal intensity
• Increased baseline noise
• S/N ratio decreases
• Spectral resolution improves which allows for more accurate spectral identification.

Characteristics of Wide Optical Slit Widths:

• More light falls on the detector
• Greater signal intensity
• Decreased baseline noise 
• S/N ratio improves
• Spectral resolution decreases and detail is lost. Less accurate spectral identification and an increase in errors for spectral library matching.

Method Development Hint: Use your HPLC Diode Array Detector (DAD or PDA) as a Spectrophotometer

One of the many useful features of a UV/VIS scanning diode array detector is that it can be employed in flow injection mode to scan a sample and provide you with some useful data about the absorbance characteristics of the sample (which probably contains a mixture of components). Unlike a spectrophotometer, you only need about 1 ul of sample instead of a 1ml cuvette and only 15-20 seconds of time to gather the data.

Why do this? I use this feature often when I receive a new and unfamiliar sample for method development. I set up the detector to scan and store all wavelengths, in steps of 2nm, from 210nm to 450nm and inject the sample in flow injection mode (that means no-column is present and I easily do this using the By-Pass position on my column selector). In a very short amount of time I can view the resulting spectra of the sample which aids me in selecting the initial discreet wavelengths to monitor. For example: If I notice that the sample shows some absorbance at 410nm using the flow injection run, then notice while developing the analysis method that none of the peaks seen show absorbance near 410nm, then I can assume that I may still have some components retained on the column.

Setup Hints:
(1) For this to work well, you should have a high performance, low volume switching valve or automated column selection system (e.g. The LC Spiderling Column Selection System) installed so you can easily by-pass your column (otherwise, remove your column and place a high pressure, low volume union in its place).
(2) Set the diode array detector to a high sampling rate because the sample is going to fly through the flow cell quickly. Use a sampling rate that is faster than you would use if a column was there to disperse the sample and slow down the peaks.
(3) Choose a wide range of wavelengths to scan and store. If the sample appears colorless to the eye in solution and I am running in a UV transparent solvent such as acetonitrile, then I often use a range of 210 to 450nm.

Determining the Data Acquisition Rate (Sampling Rate) For Your HPLC Detector

Another common question I am asked is how to set-up the HPLC detector’s sampling rate. This article is specific to commonly used UV/VIS, not mass selective detectors (Mass Spectrometer detectors are set-up in a similar manner, but you also want to take into account the numbers of MRM transitions for each peak and dwell time to account for the scanning delay. Typical values for MS are >10 points with 15-20 being best). 

Most HPLC (UHPLC) instrument manufacturer’s provide default sampling rate values within their software packages. Please do not use them as the values shown were just put there to fill in the data field and may not apply to your application or method. Many chromatographer's use these values without first understanding if they are appropriate for their own methods. This is a common mistake. Just as the manufacturer does not know what wavelength, flow rate or mobile phase you will use, they also do not know what sample(s), method and/or conditions are appropriate for your specific application. As such, they provide numerous default values in these data entry fields to satisfy the software's requirement. Just as you select an appropriate wavelength and bandwidth, you should always calculate and enter the correct detector data acquisition rate value yourself which is appropriate for your specific application, detector type and method. 

The Peak shape's role during integration: For each chromatographic analysis you must determine the optimum sampling rate for the chosen detector. An accurate value is critical for proper instrument set-up, quantification and integration of your sample(s) peaks. In the most basic sense, the area under a perfectly Gaussian peak requires at least ten points to describe it with some detail. Ten points will provide basic data about the shape of an ideal peak to the computer. Since peaks are rarely perfectly symmetrical, a larger number of points will provide more accurate integration of the peak’s actual shape and total area. This will improve run-to-run reproducibility and quantification. We suggest you include twenty to thirty data points to allow for a more detailed fit to the peak. Too few points across a peak and you lose detail and sacrifice reproducibility. Too many points and you start to introduce noise into the system. 


With these facts in mind we can next think about calculating the detector’s data acquisition rate. You must select a data rate (sampling rate) that is sure to provide the recommended 20 to 30 data points across the peak width (we use the commonly calculated peak width at half height as the time measurement). Select a detector sampling rate that will provide you with this degree of detail and resolution. This is best accomplished by initially looking at an actual chromatogram of your sample. Look at the chromatogram and use the narrowest sample or standard peak past the void time, with good retention as an example to determine the best acquisition rate. The narrowest peak will be the worst-case scenario and will insure that you have enough points across all of the remaining peaks in the sample. It's width is often measured in units of time (seconds/minutes). This data can often be read directly off of a generated data acquisition report.

Examples:

(a) If your narrowest peak has a peak width of 1.00 minute (60 seconds), then divide 30 points into 60 seconds for a result of 2 seconds per data point. The preferred sampling rate would be 2 seconds, 0.03 minutes or 0.5 Hz (depending on the units used by your detector).

(b) If your narrowest peak has a peak width of 0.20 minutes (12 seconds), then divide 30 points into 12 seconds  for a result of 0.4 seconds per data point. This equals a sampling rate of 2.5 samples per second or 2.5 Hz.

Summary:  

     To Determine the Data Acquisition Rate For Your Detector You Need To:

• Calculate the best data rate for each method and not use a generalized value (though similar methods will often use the same rate).
• Use your existing sample integration data results to identify the narrowest chromatographic peak in your analysis (at the baseline or half-height).
• Record the width value of this peak (usually in units of time).
• Divide this number by thirty (30) to determine the preferred sampling rate.
• Use this value, or a value close to it, for your detector’s sampling rate.

HPLC Flow Cell Volume & Path Length:

Modern UV/VIS detectors offer several different flow cell options. The option(s) you select can make a big difference in the level of signal sensitivity, sample dispersion and response you obtain. If you fail to note which type of HPLC flow cell you use in a particular system, then you may discover some problems when transferring a method to a different instrument. Always record the flow cell volume and path length used as part of your method description. 

Flow Cells Usually Differ In Three Ways:

(1) Maximum Rated Back-pressure;

(2) Flow Cell Volume and

(3) Flow Cell Path length. 

Let’s take a look at these in more detail.

• Maximum Rated Back-pressure: Unless the detector is in series with another detector, column or has a back-pressure regulator on it, the expected back-pressure on a typical flow cell’s outlet is just about one bar as it usually is directed to an open waste line. *This topic will be discussed in more detail in the future as part of another “hint and tip” topic. Today we are more concerned about the remaining two options:

• Flow Cell Volume: Analytical flow cells are commonly offered in nl to ul sizes. Depending on your instrument setup, column and sample(s), one flow cell volume may make more sense than another. After you have spent time separating and concentrating the peak of interest into a tiny volume you do not want to elute it off the column and mix it with another peak because the cell volume is too large. Ideal cell volume is a compromise between sample dispersion and sensitivity. The best choice will be determined mostly by the actual peak volume of your separated sample. The general rule is that your flow cell volume should be no larger than 10% of your peak volume and ideally ~ 2.5% (a 1:40 ratio), but there are some exceptions to this rule. When in doubt, experiment with different cells and do not forget to consider the total volume of all the connecting tubing and valves in your system as these contribute to many issues when the column volume decreases (such as when using mini or narrow bore columns are used). Some common analytical cell volumes offered by various manufacturers are 2 ul, 6 ul and 13 ul. For narrow bore columns (~ 2.1mm ID) a smaller cell volume (~ 2 ul) will result in less sample dispersion, while a larger cell volume may increase overall sensitivity (esp. when used with a longer path length). Mid-bore or Mid-Size columns (2.1 to 4.6mm ID) often are best suited to cell volumes around 6 ul to minimize dispersion and still provide good sensitivity. Larger flow cells such as the common 13ul size often have longer path lengths which can be used to enhance sensitivity. Standard 4.6mm ID columns often benefit from a 13ul volume cell to provide maximum sensitivity with less concern for dispersion effects when larger columns are used (e.g. 4.6 x 250mm). Keep in mind that these are general guidelines only. Most samples contain many peaks of varying width & volume, so you will need to select the cell volume that is optimized to most of the peaks found in your sample.

• Flow Cell Path Length: The flow cell’s path length affects the intensity of light reaching the detector (Beer-Lambert law). For the same volume of sample, the apparent concentration of the sample will appear to be higher if the path length is longer. There is no established standard for ‘path length’ so it is important that you always known what the path length of each flow cell is in your detector (10 mm is very common). Just as volumes vary, manufacturer’s offer different flow cells with varying path lengths. Even identical detectors can use flow cells with identical volumes, but have different path lengths. When comparing the analysis results obtained from two different instruments, always make note of the flow cell dimensions used in each instrument. If the method is to be accurately reproduced on a second system, then the flow cells used should have the same geometry (volume and path length). One way that the difference in path length can be used to enhance sensitivity of an existing method is to use a flow cell with a longer optical path length. For example, if your current flow cell has a path length of 6 mm you could replace it with one having a longer path length of 10 mm. This would increase the sample peak response (as more light would be absorbed) in your method. *This fact can be useful to squeeze out additional sensitivity in a method and often does not require any change of column or conditions.

REFERENCE WAVELENGTHS (as used in HPLC UV/VIS):

One of the most common problems that I see as a consultant in laboratories which use chromatography for sample analysis relates to how to choose appropriate settings for the modern UV/VIS detectors. In addition to selecting scientifically appropriate UV/VIS wavelength(s) and Bandwidth signal values, selecting one optional feature may invalidate an entire HPLC method. This software feature, found in many Multi-Wavelength and Scanning Diode Array UV/VIS detectors (aka: "DAD" or a "PDA") is known as the “ReferenceWavelength” .

• Please do not confuse this specific software feature ("Reference Wavelength") with the initial reference scan ('zero') which the detector takes at the start of the analysis and is subtracted from your desired signal to show only one initial signal plot (and which is used as the initial signal value to compare to the measured signal during the rest of the analysis run. This is usually known as "zeroing" the detector and occurs just once, at the start of each run. When you manually press the 'Auto-zero', you are adjusting the displayed signal plot to a know reference point (often 0.0 volts). This is a one-time zero of the signal and has nothing to do with the special software feature we discuss in this article.

"Reference Wavelength" [Usually written as: Signal Wavelength/Bandwidth: Ref Wavelength/Bandwidth]. Most manufacturers of advanced HPLC UV/VIS (esp. DAD/PDA) detectors provide this extra software feature in their chromatography software, but its use and function are a mystery to most chromatographers. As with all advanced features, proper training is required to understand and use them successfully. Using advanced features without proper training can result in analysis errors, invalid methods and perhaps very expensive product recalls.

Allow me to provide a brief explanation of the “Reference Wavelength” software feature as seen and used with many DAD and/or PDA detectors (e.g. HP/Agilent and Waters brand HPLC systems).

If you are running a gradient analysis, then the change in solvent properties (RI and light absorption/transmission) and temperature over time can cause noticeable baseline drift during the run. This drift up or down relative to the starting baseline reference point is normal, but may cause a number of quantification problems with the analysis reporting software (as flat baselines are more easily and accurately integrated than sloped ones). 

Two scientifically correct methods were developed to deal with this slippery slope of a problem. Each proposed method has some limitations, but if optimized can improve the quality of the resulting baseline (flatter, allowing for better peak integration) and preserve the original acquired signal data for compliance.

(Method # 1) Run the same method again, but this time with no sample (a blank of mobile phase) and subtract the resulting signal to produce a "blank subtracted run". This preserves the original data and removes the observed drift from the resulting signal ('A' - 'B'  = 'C'), but due to the time difference between injections, you are unable to confirm if anything has changed between the time of the first and second injection. It is not perfect.

(Method # 2) Set up the detector to collect a second channel of data (2nd wavelength signal) that is close to the original wavelength selection, BUT far enough away from the original signal such that it will not overlap any of the peak spectra of interest or other compounds in the sample. This is tricky as you want it close enough to show the drift, but far enough away to not show any sample signal. If selected carefully, it can be used as a pseudo blank run for post-run baseline subtraction. You can then subtract the second acquired ‘blank’ signal run from your original signal run and the resulting chromatogram should have a flatter baseline (less drift) for quantification purposes. With this method, two separate signals, 'A' and 'B', are collected at the same time (this is the key). A third, baseline subtracted signal, 'C', can be generated from them. This method preserves the raw data obtained from all three signals (i.e. Original, Secondary, and Subtracted signals). The benefit of this method is that the signals are all acquired using the same time base (unlike Method #1).

Using the concept of Method # 2 described above, many HPLC manufactures added a software feature known as a the ‘Reference Wavelength’ to their systems. This feature allowed a chromatographer to include with each signal choice, 'A', a second wavelength value, 'B', (and bandwidth) as part of the method which would be used to subtract out raw data from the primary wavelength during the analysis. This subtraction occurs in real-time, on your raw data gathered from the detector and the resulting data reported to the user is in fact the result of the subtraction only. The original signal data is destroyed. You will never know what the original data looked like before the reference wavelength was subtracted from it (it has been destroyed). Only the newly manipulated (subtracted) result is provided, 'C'. If any sample peak(s) or impurities appeared in the region where you selected a reference wavelength/bandwidth, then the resulting data would have been subtracted from your actual sample and you would never know it happened or have any record of it! This brings up a serious validation issue as you are modifying the original data with no way of knowing (or documenting) how you have changed it. It is for this reason alone that we teach chromatographers to always turn this feature 'OFF' by default. If they want to make use of the feature, then we suggest that they simultaneously collect data from a second, separate wavelength channel such that the two raw data streams are preserved for validation purposes (Method # 2). IOW: To acquire scientifically useful data, turn 'OFF' the Reference Wavelength software feature and record all of the signal data. The separate signals can be compared, subtracted or manipulated as needed for integration and reporting purposes, but the original signal sample data, 'A', is left unchanged and secure. This allows you to monitor for contamination, impurities, problems or changes during the run. It also allows others to verify your method for accuracy.

Observational Notes:  I am often called in to diagnose what the client's refer to as 'a strange problem' where the area of a known sample peak changes in an unexpected way. That "way" often includes going NEGATIVE, below the baseline. Or even increasing in area, mass or decreasing in mass.The column is clean, pumps work fine, retention times are stable and everything appears to be working fine. *This anomaly is due to the reference wavelength software feature being turned 'ON' and another compound (peak) absorbing in the user selected Reference bandwidth region. Its absorption contributes to the final signal. If the data collected (area) for the 'reference peak' is larger than the sample peak the resulting chromatogram will show a negative peak (this tends to be noticed by most users as it is illogical and indicates a serious problem!), whereas if the reference peak is smaller than the sample peak, the resulting area signal decreases, which may or may not be noticed (incorrectly interpreted as a lower concentration sample). You can see the obvious danger posed by this situation. Companies can be put in a situation where all of their past data is found to be invalid and product recalls may result from this finding. The cause is directly related to a lack of understanding and proper training in the use of the software and/or HPLC system.

 
How to Solve The Problem: The reason we see this feature cause so many problems in laboratories appears to be due to the fact that the Reference Wavelength software feature is being turned 'ON' by default in the software for most DAD/ PDA modules (The real default value for "Reference Wavelength" should always be: 'OFF', not on).  To make matters worse, the default values for the wavelength and bandwidths often supplied by the manufacturers are actually used by most chromatographers (what are the odds that the random values placed in the system are even relevant to your analysis? Why would you use them?). We suggest using a ‘canned’ method template in most laboratories which includes a new default value for this feature... 'OFF' for all analysis methods. Most importantly of all, please obtain formal training in the use of a specialty detector such as a diode-array detector before using one for sample analysis.

Notes

1. The bandwidth chosen for each wavelength is also very important and if chosen poorly, can result in adding noise to your signal, reducing it or even enhancing it. Please refer to this article for more info: http://hplctips.blogspot.com/2011/09/uv-vis-hplc-detector-signal-bandwidth.html 
2. If you are still running HPLC methods with the “Reference Wavelength” turned 'ON' while awaiting approval to turn it 'OFF', then you can ADD additional signals to your method with the same primary settings as before, but with “Reference Wavelength” now set to 'OFF'. Adding the same signal w/o the “Reference Wavelength” will provide you with the original signal data for future comparison to the "collected/modified" signal (allowing you to see if the data was changed). Make sure you configure these extra channels to be saved with the analysis.