HPLC PEAK Fronting and Tailing, Common Reasons For It

All users of HPLC need to know and be familiar with the correct terms used to describe non-Gaussian shaped peaks. Two of the most common undesirable peak shapes, peaks that show "Fronting" and peaks that show "Tailing" indicate problems with the HPLC method.  A quick refresher on why you may observe an HPLC peak front or tail on the chromatogram follows. 

Peak FRONTING: First, let us define what peak fronting looks like. The leading edge (front) of the peak is vertical, straight up and non-Gaussian in shape. This sharp increase in signal is easy to spot. 

Common Reasons for Peak FRONTING:

• Poor sample/peak capacity. In other words, too low a K prime (not enough retention on the HPLC column) resulting in no chromatography taking place. To solve this problem you must develop a proper HPLC method which first retains the compound(s) of interest, holds them long enough to obtain an acceptable K prime and resolve them away from other peaks, then elutes them off the column.

• Injection Solution Too Strong:Your sample(s) should be dissolved in the mobile phase and not in a solution that is "stronger" in elution strength than the mobile phase. Example: If you method is 100% aqueous, do not inject the sample in a solution with organic solvent. Follow fundamental good chromatography guidelines.

• Column Fouling / Overloading of sample. When the HPLC column is overloaded with sample, the peak shape will show fronting. Decrease the injection volume and/or concentration, as appropriate, in 10x graduations until the peak shape is normal.

• Saturation of the Detector: Just as with overloading the column the peak shape may change, overloading the detector's measuring range may also result in saturation of the signal and loss of accuracy. Decrease the injection volume and/or concentration, as appropriate, in 10x graduations until the peak shape is normal and back on-scale.

Peak TAILING: First, let us define what peak tailing looks like. The trailing edge (tail) of the peak slowly drops off towards the baseline and  is non-Gaussian in shape. For those with GC experience it appears similar to a peak that "bleeds" and continues to interact with the column for an extended period of time.

Common Reasons for Peak TAILING:

• Flow path Diffusion (from extra-delay volume). Poorly swaged fittings/connectors, a column with a void, incorrectly sized capillary connection lines may all contribute to peak tailing. Optimize the flow path, column and connections.

• pH dependence for ionizable compounds. If the sample is easily ionized and the difference between the pka of the sample and the mobile phase is less than 2 pH unit, tailing may result. Being sure to work within a safe pH range for your column, increase or decrease the mobile phase pH to be > 2 pH units away from the sample's pka to reduce tailing.

• Type 'A' silica or heavy metal contamination of the support. Many older style column supports did not use ultra-pure, heavy metal free packing material. These material often interacted with the sample on the column resulting in changes in retention, The use of more modern type 'B' or 'C' packings has eliminated many of these problems.

• Residual silanol groups present on support. As with the earlier type 'A' supports, non fully end-capped supports with residual silanol groups often resulted in secondary, extended retention effects. Use of more modern, fully end-capped, ultra-high purity packing materials (and/or mobile phases which better address these residual groups) often allow Gaussian peak shapes without the need for many additives.

• Column Fouling / Overloading of sample. When a column is not washed of all retained material after each analysis, it may build up over time and change the surface chemistry of the support. This may lead to changes in retention, especially delays in both binding and elution. Wash, regenerate or replace the column to solve.

You may also be interested in reading a related article; "Two Common HPLC Problems and their Causes (Sudden changes to either the HPLC Backpressure or Peak Shape)".

A Case of Changing Solution pH. Formic Acid Stability in Solution (Methanol)

Real life examples help to better illustrate problems that I am called in to troubleshoot for clients. As a professional scientific consultant, many of my clients have spent months (sometimes years) trying to solve an analytical problem on their own before I am brought in to make the diagnosis and propose a solution. Many years of working in a wide range of scientific fields allows me to identify problems quickly and efficiently saving clients the most money and allowing them to resume work on their projects.

This was the case during a recent consult for a major cannabis testing laboratory. They were having a great deal of difficulty obtaining reproducible results for their analytical testing screens (14 compounds in their analysis with a need for repeatable and accurate results). Variations from 25% to 50% were observed run-to-run over the course of seven days. They assured me they were doing everything in the same way. To begin the troubleshooting process, we started by looking at the actual data gathered and the actual method(s) used to acquire the data. These were evaluated to see if they followed good practices and techniques, also to make sure they had SOP's in place which were clear. Good SOP's must include enough detail to allow anyone reviewing them to prepare samples, standards and/or solutions in the exact same way. Additionally, the HPLC instrumentation was checked and tested to verify it was performing as designed.

After reviewing their training and methodologies on-site, a number of areas of concern were quickly identified. One of the most likely reasons for the variation in values over time was found to be caused by a common mistake in the preparation of mobile phase solutions for the HPLC system. To save time, the client's scientists prepared all organic solvent solutions in advance (~ one month or more), then filtered and stored them at room temperature. For example, their solutions of 0.1% formic acid in HPLC grade Methanol were pre-mixed and stored in glass one liter bottles. These bottles were then put aside, for an average of one month before use. This finding proved key as someone with proper HPLC training would be aware of a well known problem when formic acid is left in pure organic solvent, especially methanol, over time (less so with ACN). Briefly, the formic acid content degrades quickly over time and is often found to be only half of what it was initially after just three or four days (If you have not done so already, this is a simple and useful experiment to run in your lab, monitoring the acid level by titration, not with a pH meter, over time at room temperature in methanol)! This degradation continues over time reducing the amount of acid in solution. If the acid is added to the solution to enhance ionization (i.e. LC-MS; LC-MS/MS) or provide acidification to maintain the sample in a fully ionized form, then as the level of acidification decreases, so does the solution's ability to maintain it. In other words, your HPLC method may change over time (resulting in an in-valid method).

•  I have always promoted the importance of making and using freshly prepared mobile phase solutions (daily), especially where any aqueous solutions are used (to prevent degradation of additives and/or bacterial or fungi growth). However, this precaution does not normally apply to many pure organic solvents, but there are a few very important exceptions to this, formic acid and methanol in this example. 

Changes were made to their SOP's to insure that future solutions of formic acid in methanol were not prepared in advance, but instead, fresh on the day needed only. This coupled with a few basic improvements to their column washing, equilibration and overall training resulted in %RSD of only 0.3% for future analysis runs.

 
As a side note, I have been asked why solutions of formic acid in methanol are sold commercially for HPLC use? I have no answer to this, but respectfully remind everyone that just because something is offered for sale, does not mean it should be purchased. Ask yourself if the item is appropriate for your application? It may not be suitable for your use or application. 

BTW: Please be sure to flush your HPLC system of all organic acids (e.g. acetic, formic) after use and do not leave them in the HPLC system overnight. Even 1% levels of organic acids may be corrosive to stainless steel. 

HPLC Solvents, Acetonitrile and Methanol, Key Differences and Properties

Widely used in RP HPLC method development, Acetonitrile (ACN) and Methanol (MeOH) are the two most common solvents you will use with water or aqueous buffers to develop methods. So, besides the fact that Acetonitrile is well know to have a higher elution strength / capacity than Methanol [*but NOT at high organic concentrations (e.g. 95% Methanol vs 95% ACN) where Methanol has a higher elution strength than Acetonitrile does], what other properties should chromatographer's be aware of? Let's discuss a few that all chromatographers should know.

PREPARATIONS of MIXTURES (A/B):
First, a few comments about the preparation of mobile phase solutions. 

• Only the purely aqueous portion can be correctly adjusted for pH. Do not try and measure or adjust the pH of the organic or organic solution mixture. 

     There are two common methods of preparing binary mixtures (V/V) of mobile phase solutions.

• Method #1 is to fill a volumetric flask with a specific volume of the "A" solution, then fill the flask up to the line with the "B" solution.

• Method #2 is to fill a graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of "A" solution; fill a second graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of the "B" solution and then mix the contents of both together.

Whichever method you use, please fully document it in your HPLC method so anyone reading it will be able to accurately reproduce it. The two methods described above are both correct in design, but will result in solutions with different properties.

ABSORBANCE of UV LIGHT:
For HPLC grade solvent (*we should always use HPLC or LC-MS grade solutions in HPLC analysis), ACN has the lowest absorbance (~ 190 nm) of the two making it well suited for low UV applications. HPLC grade MeOH has a slightly higher UV cut-off, around 205-210 nm, limiting its use in the very low UV ranges. *Methods which require low UV wavelengths (<230 nm) should not use Methanol as the primary solvent.

SOLVENT SOLUBILITY:
There is a significant difference between ACN and MeOH in their ability to dissolve many types of buffer salts AND samples. These differences may be critical during method development as higher salt concentrations could lead to plugs, clogs or precipation. 

Solubility of the Mobile Phase:

• A common reason for gradient runs to show poor reproducibility or to fail may be associated with running high concentrations of buffer combined with high concentrations of organic solvent. Most aqueous / organic solutions containing salt solutions of less than 10 mM concentration are not likely to precipitate under most gradient conditions (running to a max of 95% organic, not 100%). If high percentages of organic solvent are mixed with more concentrated buffer solutions, then the higher salt concentrations may precipitate out of solution during the analysis (resulting in clogs, leaks, plugs and/or inaccurate results). Be cautious when mixing organic solvents and buffers together for gradient analysis. Make sure the solutions used will stay in solution and be stable at all concentrations used. Also verify that the buffering capacity is still present when high organic concentrations are used (as your buffer will be diluted). *Not sure if the salt will stay in solution? Just mix up a sample at the same concentration for a test. Look at it. Is there any turbidity or particulate visible? You should have your answer.

• Methanol's overall better solubility characteristics (better than ACN) mean that it often does a better job of dissolving most salts (esp NH4, K and Na) at higher concentrations resulting in better performance and less precipitation.

Solubility of the Samples (changes to Peak Shape, Selectivity & Retention):

• A fundamental requirement of liquid chromatography is that the sample fully dissolves in the mobile phase (initial mobile phase). Dissolve the sample in the mobile phase or in a slightly weaker strength solution (not a stronger solution) before analysis. This insures it will be loaded onto the head of the column as a concentrated slug improving peak shape and RSD. If the sample does not fully dissolve in the mobile phase then you are not in fact analyzing the whole sample. Another area where Methanol may be superior to ACN can be found in its ability to fully dissolve more types of samples. This improved solubility may result in better overall peak shape. Methanol also has different selectivity, often better than ACN (not just the elution strength) which may result in peaks eluting at different retention times than expecting. This is another reason why we always try different mobile phase mixtures containing either ACN or MeOH when developing RP methods. Please never assume that one solvent will be better than the other. Too many novice chromatographer's use only ACN as their main organic solvent for method development. Please don't make their mistake as such a strategy indicates a lack of practical experience and knowledge. You must first try them both separately (ACN & MeOH) to evaluate the results with your own sample (best to start with comprehensive gradients at different pH values, as applicable). You will be rewarded for putting in the initial time to test both types of solutions as no simulator has yet been developed which can predict a truly accurate result with your own sample(s). You may be surprised to learn how many samples show better peak shape and performance using MeOH solutions. If no improvement is seen, document it and move forward with more confidence.

BACKPRESSURE & OUTGASSING:

• ACN is less viscous than MeOH ( 0.34 vs. 0.54 viscosity, respectively) and if used alone will result in lower column and system back-pressures overall. Less gas will dissolve into ACN vs MeOH. Mixtures of ACN and Water will also exhibit an endothermic reaction (cooling the solution) which can trap gas inside the solution. If you pre-mix your mobile phase, let it rest for several minutes after preparation.Mixtures of ACN and Water will show a pressure max around 70% ACN (*This is an unusual characteristic well worth learning).
  

• MeOH is more viscous than ACN alone. It also has an unusual property where a 50/50 mixture of MeOH and Water will result in a much higher system and column back pressure than either MeOH or Water alone will (*ACN has a similar property, but the peak pressure occurs between 60-70%). The effect with methanol is very Gaussian with a peak pressure observed with a 50/50 mixture. An exothermic reaction results from an initial mixture of the two solutions (MeOH and Water) releasing some gas. When preparing solutions it is best to allow the solution to rest for a few minutes to out-gas before topping off or using in the HPLC system.

I hope that this short discussion about some of the differences between these two popular HPLC solvents will aid you in developing better quality HPLC and LC-MS methods.

Reference: Table of HPLC Solvent Properties

Modern HPLC Method Development Tips (PART II):

This is the second of two articles (Part I) which will provide suggestions on how to improve the HPLC (UHPLC) method development process. - PART II

INITIAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT:

1. Before you start, learn what you can about your sample, its hazards, solubility and properties. Conduct a quick literature and/or keyword search on the web using a popular search engine (e.g. GOOGLE). You can often find many journal articles, white papers, application notes and chemical data on the web in just a few minutes.
2. Determine which liquids your compound(s) are soluble in. Use a pipette and several glass vials or tubes with different solutions (pH is important too). This will narrow down the types of mobile phase and chromatography modes that you can use.
3. Column choice is the most important part of method development. The stationary phase that you choose has the single greatest effect on selectivity! Select the right column and mode of chromatography. Most RP methods should start with at least a modern ultra high purity, metal free type B silica column with a C8 or C18 support (*But you must select the column type that best suits your application). For small molecules (<1,000 Daltons) select a standard sized analytical column with a 2.5 to 5.0 micron particle size and pore size between 60 and 120 Å (e.g. 4.6 x 150 mm; 3.0 x 100 mm). *For larger peptide or protein molecules you will need a particle with a large pore size (~ 300 Å). For optimal results, columns with very small internal volumes should be paired with HPLC systems with similar ultra-low internal delay volumes. Your HPLC system should be optimized to balance the needs of good mixing, low delay volume and proper sampling rate for your method. If the method is likely to be transferred to different types of HPLC systems, then you may want to initially stay away from the < 2.1 u particle supports for your method development. At this time, these tiny particles can not be reliably packed into columns as well as the larger sized particles and generally have much poorer %RSD values than larger particles (i.e. 2.5 to 5 u). Method development is initially easier & generally more rugged using conventional particle sizes [Keep things simple when starting out. You can always change later on]. Once you have selected a column and decided on a flow rate, make sure you calculate and measure the actual column void volume to find the 'Tzero value' (column dwell volume). You will need this value to find out if your compound has been retained on the column (K prime) and to also determine most of the needed performance calculations and parameters.
4. Once you have selected an HPLC column (if possible, please start with a brand new column) you will need to test it and establish a baseline to show that it meets both the manufacturer’s specifications and, far more importantly, that it meets your method’s requirements. In most cases, do not use the manufacturer’s QC test solution for this. Those stds are designed to allow the column to easily pass manufacturing QC, not the more critical requirements that you may need to prove. We prefer to use a real sample mixture (~2 compounds) that are similar to the type proposed for the method. They must be well retained on the column (K prime of > 2), easy to prepare, stable and reliable. This std and the specific method you develop for it, will be used to prove the column’s performance (i.e. R, S, K prime, Tzero, Plates). It will be used again, when the column’s performance is called into question.  
5. Notes on Mobile phase and additives: Keep it simple. Avoid the use of any additives such as ion-pairing reagents when first starting out. They are overused in general and can cause problems later on. If required, they can always be added later on. Use only HPLC grade solvents, fresh RO HPLC grade Water and the highest purity acids, bases and/or additives, if required. Use only filtered (0.22u) products. Always dissolve samples in the mobile phase (or a weaker solution) for injection. For many RP methods a low pH mobile phase (~ pH 2.5) provides a good starting place. Samples with a pKa far enough away from this value are likely to be retained, stable and unaffected by small changes in pH. *pH is usually one of the last parameters which is optimized.
6. Use a Gradient Method to find the approximate elution conditions of the mixture AND make sure you are detecting all of the compounds injected onto the column [For dedicated RP isocratic methods, start with a high organic mobile phase % (i.e. 95%) and record the results. Continue to reduce the organic content in steps of 10% and observe where the best compromise exists between retention and elution]. For RP gradient methods, start with a very high aqueous % (e.g. 98%) and run your gradient, slowly, to a very high organic % (e.g. 95% or 98%, not 100%!) to make sure you retain, hold, and then elute everything. Your mobile phase conditions must be strong enough to elute everything off the column during the gradient portion of the run (long enough hold time). Please Do NOT include the gradient reversal portion back to initial conditions (wash and re-equilibration) of the gradient as part of the same analysis method. The method should end after the gradient has reached and been held at its maximum level for a period of time (we refer to this as the "hold time"). It should NOT switch back to the initial conditions to re-equilibrate the column. Don't make this novice mistake. Column flushing and re-equilibration should be a separate method and/or step, separate from your analysis method. If you include your column flushing (washing) and re-equilibration steps as part of your analysis method, you are also forcing the baseline's slope to change radically. This may interfere with integration plus include extra peaks and baseline changes that you are going to have to integrate, identify and explain to others (e.g. auditors). Additionally, including these wash steps as part of the same method wastes time as you must wait for these steps to complete before you can start to process the data obtained in the analysis method. Summary: Develop methods like the professionals do and create separate Analysis and Flush/Re-Equilibration Methods (or steps).
7. If your compounds can be seen with a UV/VIS detector, then make sure you are using a Diode Array Detector (aka, DAD or PDA) set to scan a wide range of wavelengths (e.g. 210 - 410 nm). Method development should not be performed using a single or multi-wavelength detector. This invites errors, limits the utility of the method and does not result in any cost savings. You must have a full scanning detector so you can detect all possible peaks at the same time. If you use a single or dual wavelength detector you may not know if an impurity has been introduced or if you have a co-eluter (because you will have no way to detect it). Generic starting settings for Wavelength Bandwidth should be ~ 8 nm, software based Reference Wavelength OFF and the sampling rate must be set to collect at least 20+ peaks/sample peak of the narrowest sample peak observed and integrated (at ½ height). Run with scanning turned 'on' for all analysis methods and review the spectral data for each run. This provides important qualitative data about the compounds which may be used for purity determination and also to demonstrate how the method is selective for the compound(s) of interest. *If your compounds do not absorb well (weak chromophores), then you may still want to have a UV/VIS detector inline (first) with a secondary detector second. The UV/VIS detector will still be very useful for troubleshooting and detecting other compounds. Select an appropriate type of detector and compatible mobile phase as required for the secondary detector (e.g. RID, EC, FLD, ELSD, CAD, MS...). Note: If available, LC-DAD-MS is one of the most useful instrument setups for LC method development.
8. This needs to be repeated (from Part I)....  Before starting ANY HPLC analysis, the HPLC pump must be running and operating with no problems, achieving a stable baseline, steady flow rate with as little pulsation as possible (~ 1% ripple or less). Accuracy depends on this. Do not begin any HPLC analysis unless the HPLC pumping system is working perfectly.