Notes on Cleaning bound Protein from RP HPLC columns:

First, a few comments:

• ·         Before proceeding with any column regeneration or cleaning procedures, always refer to the specific advice provided by the column manufacturer. Approved maintenance and cleaning instructions can often be found in the product guide which comes with the new column. Their guidelines supersede these!

• ·         Columns are consumable items. After a suitable amount of use, the time and materials required to regenerate them may cost more than the purchase of a replacement column. Always have a new, spare column on hand.
  

•        Do not overload the column! This is the most common reason for column fouling, flow path contamination and sample carryover issues. In most cases, injection volume should be less than 1% of the column volume (maximum).
  

• ·         Protect your detector. Before washing or cleaning the column, disconnect the column outlet line and direct the column to waste only.

•        Column Storage solutions are not the same as column wash solutions. Never store a column in buffer or ion pairing containing solutions.

For RP supports, if buffers have been used, always start by washing the column down with ultra-high purity water and some organic solvent (e.g. Water/MeOH, 95%/5%) to remove all salts. Use about 10 column volumes to flush these off. Do not wash the column with organic solvents until you have first washed it thoroughly with high-purity filtered water.

Polymeric resins (e.g. PS-DVB) from many manufacturers can effectively be cleaned using 0.1 M Sodium Hydroxide solution or a mobile phase solution containing equal parts of isopropanol (IPA) and 1 to 3 M Guanidine hydrochloride at ~ 50 °C. Optionally, some success has been reported using other solutions such as: 5M Urea (pH 7) buffer solution; 1 M NaCl (pH 7) and even mixtures containing some methylene chloride solvent. Check with the manufacturer first as column damage/plugging may result if their directions are not followed.!

For RP silica based supports (non-SEC), we often start with a series of wash solutions. In most cases, pure water or pure organic solvents such as MeOH or ACN will not remove bound protein (common novice mistakes). An acid, base or even an ion pairing reagent is often needed to clean them. Start simple and monitor.

 

For RP silica based supports (SEC), a high salt buffer solution often releases bound proteins quickly. A mobile phase containing water plus an alcohol (methanol, IPA or ethanol) may also prove effective too.  Optionally, a solution of 0.5 M guanidine hydrochloride may effectively remove bound material.

General Advice: One of the first general wash solutions to start with (especially to remove basic compounds) is a 1% Acetic acid solution in Methanol (50/50). If desired a stronger acid such as 0.1 % Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) or 0.1 % Formic Acid can be swapped for the acetic acid (where possible, start with a weaker acid). Use a low concentration of acid to achieve a pH of ~ 2.5. This acidic wash can be followed with a neutral solution, or if needed, a later solution where IPA or ACN replaces the MeOH used (50/50).

For extreme cases where the column has been overloaded with protein, a 5 M Urea solution has been proven effective in removing bound protein from silica and polymeric supports too. A word of caution, as the resulting pH of this strong solution may be greater than or equal to pH 9. Many types of silica based RP columns can not withstand strongly basic solutions and the silica inside may dissolve (plugging the column). Start with a lower concentration wash  first. You can always increase it later. Always read the instruction sheet carefully which came with the specific HPLC column to determine if it can be used at these high pH levels. Another salt solution that has shown some promise is 1 M sodium phosphate solution, pH 7.0. Run the salt solutions for about one hour at a moderate flow rate. Follow up all washes with rinses of mixtures of water and MeOH (80/20), then 90% MeOH/Water. 

Please remember that in ALL cases, HPLC columns are consumable items with a limited lifetime. Dispose of them properly when they are damaged or contaminated and replace with a new column. Once you have a fresh clean column to work with, prevent column fouling by developing better quality methods which utilize frequent, properly developed wash methods (using a wash solution which is stronger than your analysis mobile phase), filter all samples and be sure they fully dissolve in solution (100%). *Column fouling is not normal and can be prevented with proper training.

HPLC Retention Time Drift, Change, Area Variability or Poor Reproducibility. Common Reasons for it.

Retention times and area measurements must be reproducible from run to run. When problems are observed, late, early or variable retention times (and/or peak area values) may be observed. Variation outside of acceptable limits indicates a problem with the sample preparation, method design, function of the HPLC system or a lack of training. Here are several commonly observed reasons why sample (or standard) peak retention times or peak area values may not be reproducible:

(1) TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS:

To obtain reproducible results, the temperature of the HPLC column must be kept constant or controlled during each analysis. Laboratory room temperatures can vary up and down by several degrees during the course of one day and these changes will often change the retention characteristics of the sample(s). The 'On' and 'Off' cycling of power from an air conditioner or heating unit will often cause the baseline to drift in a cyclical manner, up and down, during the day (this can often be seen as a clear sine wave pattern when you zoom-in to study the baseline trace over time). Temperature also changes the refractive index of the mobile phase. Optical (Light) based detectors (i.e. UV/VIS, RI...) will show this change as drift up or down). In some cases, a temperature change of plus or minus one degree C from run-to-run can cause changes in retention times which effect reliability of the method. 

To reduce temperature fluctuations, you must control the temperature of the column and mobile phase (if applicable) during the analysis. This is most commonly done by: (a) using fully equilibrated mobile phase at the start of the day or analysis, (b) keeping the interconnecting lines as short as possible (esp. any which exit the column and go to detectors/flow cells), (c) insulating any stainless steel lines with plastic tubing sleeves to reduce heat loss and (d) using a thermostatted column compartment to maintain the column at a single set temperature throughout the day. Control of the column temperature will remove 'temperature' as a variable from your analysis. Method analysis temperature should be constant from run to run, not a variable. Be sure and document the temperature selected as part of your method. 

(2) INADEQUATE MOBILE PHASE MIXING:

Both high pressure (with separate pumps) and low pressure pumping (one pump with a proportioning valve module) systems depend on efficient mixing to accurately meter the requested mobile phase composition. For gradient analysis, failure to completely mix the mobile phase solution before it enters the HPLC column often results in excessive baseline noise, spikes and poor Retention time reproducibility. If your mobile phase composition changes, then the chromatography will change too (e.g. evaporation of the more volatile organic phase from an open bottle may result in a change in composition). "Mixing" is often accomplished directly in a mixer installed in the flow path of an HPLC pump (For more info, please read this article on selecting a mixer). The associated noise and ripple of incomplete mixing can reduce the limit of detection (LOD) and increase integration error. This mixer is often a static mixer (a simple 'Tee', a tube filled with baffles, a frit or beads, valve orifice or microfluidic device) of low volume design for chromatography use, but allows adequate mixing of the liquids within a prescribed flow rate range. The best mixers incorporate longitudinal and radial mixing in-line. A mixer with too low a volume or of insufficient design can result in poor mixing of the mobile phase (note: incorrect solvent compressibility settings can also cause mixing, flow instability and noise problems too). To reduce mixing problems, first insure that the mobile phases used are fully soluble with each other. Next, make sure that any mixer used is appropriate for the flow rates and volumes you will be using. Monitor the baseline for drift, ripple and artifacts in real time to spot problems and make adjustments to correct them. 

(3) INADEQUATE MOBILE PHASE DEGASSING:

For the best results, continuously degass your mobile phase. Reducing the amount of gas in solution will also improve signal to noise levels of detection, reduce Retention time drift and reduce pump cavitation. If you are using an electronic vacuum degassing module, make sure it is maintained and working 100%. A faulty degasser may cause more damage to your system and methods. Maintain and Repair them just as you do for your other instrument modules. Gas bubbles may cause the inlet or outlet check valves to malfunction (get stuck), baseline noise spikes to appear randomly, flow rates and/or back pressure values to become irregular, detector outputs to show high levels of noise (from air in the flow cell) and also cause the loss of prime or cavitation in pumps. To achieve the best balance of low noise levels and high reliability, both aqueous and organic mobile phases should be fully degassed. This can be accomplished through stand alone vacuum degassing modules or through gentle helium gas sparging. In all cases, degassing must be continuous (not just done one time). Continuous degassing reduces cyclical noise and signal variations. For this reason, I do not recommend using ultrasonic baths to degass mobile phase solutions as these are not used continuously. The mobile phase solution starts to re-absorb gas as soon as you stop sonicating the solution. This results in continuous baseline drift.

Removal of gasses is critical to the function of a modern HPLC pumping system. The liquids used are compressed to very high levels which forces out solubilized gas from the solutions. This is best accomplished before the liquid is transferred into the pump. These gas bubbles must be minimized to achieve desirable baselines. *Even if you use a high pressure pumping system, an inline degassing system reduces the amount of noise and baseline drift. Properly maintain and service your degasser to insure compliant operation. IOW: Always degas your mobile phase solutions.

 

(4) SYSTEM LEAKS or FLOW RATE INSTABILITY:

If the peak retention times have increased over time, one possible reason for this change could be a leak. If your flow rate is reduced by a leak, then the retention times will be longer. Always be alert to this pattern of change and check for any signs of leaks on a regular basis. If you find a leak, do not use the HPLC system until it has been repaired. If there is no leak, then the flow rate may not be what you think it is. 

When the actual flow rate is in question, start by checking it manually (never trust the instrument's display screen or the software value for flow rate. Measure it). An easy way to measure the flow rate involves timing the amount of liquid that exits the HPLC detector line after a defined period of time. For example: If your flow rate is set at 1.000 ml/minute, measure the time it takes to fill a 10ml graduated cylinder. It must take exactly 10.00 minutes.

Inadequate degassing, sticking check valves and/or incorrect solvent compressibility values may also cause flow instability.

(5) COLUMN FOULING: 

One of the most common reasons for changes in retention times or area values of well established peak(s) are due to column contamination and fouling of the support material (or of the inlet frit, guard column). The most common reason for this to happen is due to a lack of column flushing or washing after each analysis (esp when running only isocratic methods). Samples that have been poorly prepared, not filtered or were sourced from a complex matrix (i.e. clinical samples) often contain many compounds which are in-addition to the compound of interest. These materials can be retained on the column and not eluted off during each analysis. They build up over time and cause all kinds of strange problems, including changing retention times, new peaks seen and poor overall or wide peak shapes. 

Gradient analysis provides an opportunity to make sure you use a strong enough mobile phase to elute everything off the column during the run. Make sure you ramp up to a high enough concentration of solvent and use a "hold time" to insure this.

Isocratic analysis is a worst case situation for this to occur as the mobile phase is not ramped up to a strong solvent at the end of the method to push off any late eluters, Instead, they accumulate on the column. 

If you use isocratic methods to analyze samples, then you must follow each analysis run with a second, and separate from your analysis method, "column only wash step". This method does not inject any sample. Instead, it uses a strong wash solution which is compatible with your column AND is well known to dissolve any accumulated material into solution and elute it all off the column. For NP applications an alcohol (e.g. MeOH) may be suitable for this job and for RP applications ACN or even MeCl may be be appropriate. Check with the column manufacturer to find out which wash solutions should be used (do not guess, base it on actual sample solubility). 

(6) SAMPLE OVERLOADING (or too large an Injection volume/concentration for the column): If you inject (load) more sample than the column can hold (as determined by a proper loading study), then the peak that results will often be broader in width with more tailing (from diffusion). This will result in a peak which elutes later than expected, fouls the column and results in poor reproducibility.  Be sure to inject the sample dissolved in the mobile phase (or a solution that is weaker than the mobile phase).

(7) SAMPLE INJECTION VOLUME VARIATION: The injection volume used must be appropriate for the type of injector used. All injectors have a stated range in which they are most accurate. Make sure you are injecting within this ideal range and not at the extreme ends of the range (larger error). Manual injectors with fixed loops should be overfilled (3x) for best results. Autosampler vials must be correctly chosen to be compatible with the injector used, contain an excess of liquid and have a loose cap to prevent evaporation or a vacuum from forming inside the vial. *Test injector accuracy and reproducibility separately, at the volume used for your analysis, as part of your method development review. *Review my article on HPLC injectors for more information.

(8) Changes in the pH OF the MOBILE PHASE: Samples containing ionizable compounds are strongly effected by the pH of your mobile phase. Solutions should be prepared fresh, each day (*acids in solvent may change over time). Buffer capacity is often overlooked (the ability to resist pH change). It is highest at the pKa of the acid/base. Try to work within ±1 pH unit of the buffers pKa value for the best pH control of the mobile phase. If your mobile phase is buffered too far away from its pKa, then poor peak shape or variable retention times are often the result. Note: Weakly ionizable samples can be very sensitive to changes of as little as 0.1 pH unit. 

Carry-Over (Carryover) Contamination in HPLC and LC-MS Systems

"Carry-over" is a term used to describe a type of sample contamination which causes sample peaks to re-appear in later runs which do not actually contain the sample (e.g. blank runs). The contamination can last for several sequential runs, often decreasing in amount after each injection (which is a key observation when troubleshooting). When proper instrument training has been provided, modern HPLC system designs make carryover extremely rare, but when it does appear, the contamination can be due to: (1) A lack of HPLC maintenance; (2) Overloading samples which foul the column; (3) Poor Wash Vial Usage and/or Sample Vial Selection; (4) Inadequate operator training in how to set-up and use the chromatography system. *Note: Proper operator training greatly reduces the chances of contamination and is the most overlooked reason for the problem.

The Types of HPLC Carry-Over Contamination; Why They Occur and How To Reduce Them:

(1) A Lack of HPLC Maintenance: Most auto-injector valves rely on a rotary seal to move the sample from the needle loop to the flow path of the system. The components within these valves wear out and should be inspected at least every 6 months and replaced when needed. Also, always check the needle seat and needle for signs of wear or leaking. Note: Look for signs of leaks by the injector. Leaks always indicate a problem and should be fixed immediately. Don't run samples when you have leaks. Your method and data obtained will be invalid. Any worn parts should be replaced and the system performance tested. One of the most common causes of carry-over is due to a worn sample injector valve rotary seal. A worn seal can allow sample to be retained in the worn grooves, in-between injections, resulting in sample peaks appearing in subsequent runs. Additionally, buffer salts can lodge between the seals causing leaks or carryover. Routine HPLC service and, if applicable, flushing of all buffers/salts every day can eliminate these issues.

(2) Column Fouling / Overloading of Sample: If you inject too high a concentration of sample and overload your column with material, then it is possible that your column will continue to bleed sample long after the analysis is over. This also happens when the sample has a high affinity for the support you have chosen too. Failure to regularly flush and clean your HPLC column on a regular basis can also result in a similar problem as retained material is released from the column over time. Avoid this problem by performing a loading study to determine how much material can be effectively loaded on to the column. Next, create a wash method which utilizes a stronger solvent than your method (often utilizing a gradient) which will wash away any strongly retained material in between runs. This is critical if you are running an isocratic method as material will be retained on the column and must be washed off at frequent intervals using a stronger wash solution. *When using only isocratic methods, people often do not initially observe carry-over problems (because the sample just sticks to the column and accumulates over time). When the solvent strength is changed or the method is revised to a gradient, then the problems start... Avoid the problem by selecting the right column (which retains, then elutes ALL of the sample), not overloading the column (do a loading study) and washing the column down with a stronger solution that fully dissolves (not precipitates out) any remaining material off the column after each run.

(3) Wash Vial Usage and/or Sample Vial Selection: If you are using a modern high-pressure, "Flow-Through" design autoinjector (e.g. Agilent 1100, 1200, 1260, 1290), then carryover is rarely an issue as these modern injectors use a high pressure pump to aspirate and inject the samples directly into the flow path, reducing the need for any wash stage. The entire HPLC's injection flow path is continuously washed with mobile phase during the analysis run. This dramatically reduces the chances of any sample re-appearing in later runs. The need for a separate wash vial is nearly eliminated in this way as the needle, needle seat, loop, injector pump and valve are all flushed clean during each method. Many older auto-injector designs utilize either a low pressure injector (glass syringe) or injector pump which is not part of the main flow path. These injectors benefit from a separate wash vial as they are not continuously cleaned. Effective cleaning requires that a wash vial be employed in these cases. It should be filled with mobile phase or a solution which will dissolve any remaining material which might still be in the system.

When sticky sample solutions are used, separate Wash Vials can be used to reduce contamination with either older or newer injector designs . Sometimes these sticky samples can adhere to the outside of the needle while it is being withdrawn from a vial which has a septa which has been punctured many times. High puncture rates tend to open up the hole resulting in a lack of "wiping' of the needle surface upon withdrawal. *For vials that are punctured many times, it is critical to replace the septa OR use septa materials which seal for a long enough time frame to reduce this effect. Septa needle wiping eliminates some of this contamination. Two types of contamination can occur from this problem. (a) When the needle is dipped into a vial (same or different one) which also has a large septa opening, it can carry some of the sample with it and deposit it into the new vial (or onto the septa of the vial). (b) The contamination can also run down the needle itself and drip onto the needle seat at the time of injection resulting in contamination of the seat or sample.

One of the easiest solutions to reduce external needle contamination involves incorporating a wash vial which contains a solution which is optimized to quickly dissolve the sample into solution. This sounds simple, but many chromatographer's choose wash solutions which do not enhance the cleaning aspect of the needle at all. For example: Mobile phase, which is normally ideal, but does not work in some cases. Samples such as peptides, proteins, fats, oils and/or lipids can be troublesome as their solubility can be at odds with the mobile phase chosen. For the wash vial to be effective, it must quickly dissolve the material. The needle can be first "dunked" (dipped) into one vial containing the solution and withdrawn, followed by an aspiration and wash in a second wash vial. If needed, you take this cleaning one step further and use additional aspiration steps to serially dilute any remaining material. These wash vials must be changed frequently (easily done by having several wash vial positions programmed in the system). Additionally, the caps should be left OFF the wash vials to reduce pickup contamination each time they are used (this step is critical).

Lastly, if you are analyzing sticky materials which are known to interact with metals found in chromatography systems, consider using a system which incorporates bio-compatible materials such as titanium, tantalum and/or polymers such as PEAK. You can also utilize plastic sample vials (e.g. PP) or plastic vial inserts too.

(4) Inadequate Operator Training: Good chromatography requires a complete understanding of the hardware used and the fundamentals of HPLC. You must be able to troubleshoot the complete flow path of the system and understand the concepts of chromatography as used in method development. This is not a technique best learned by trial and error, but rather through mentoring using logical steps. Depending on your skill set, troubleshooting a "carry-over" problem in an HPLC system can take minutes to months to diagnose and solve. We learn these skills through hands-on experience and training. Reading many of the better books and articles on the subject matter helps too. Get as much practical hands-on training as you can. Ask your supervisor or manager(s) to invest in you by purchasing professional training for you in this field so you can learn on your own systems. You will learn far faster this way and spend less time troubleshooting problems and more time running samples, accurately in less overall time. Training also costs just a fraction of what the instrumentation and your salary are. If you have acquired the fundamental skills, a skilled teacher can impart about one years worth of practical knowledge to you in as little as one week of training.

Summary: The two most common reasons for sample carry-over contamination in an HPLC or LC/MS system are due to: lack of operator training and/or lack of system maintenance (most commonly manifested as a worn injector rotor seal).

 Note: This article specifically addresses carry-over contamination as it relates to the most commonly used HPLC, UHPLC and LC-MS autoinjectors (or autosampler modules).

You may wish to read a related article on "Troubleshooting HPLC Injectors (Manual and Automated)" found at this link: http://hplctips.blogspot.com/2013/06/troubleshooting-hplc-injectors-manual.html

HPLC PUMP SEAL WASH & FLUSHING THE HPLC

Many instrument vendors offer an HPLC Pump with "Piston Seal Wash" option. If you often operate your instrument with high concentrations of aqueous salt buffers (e.g. Protein, Peptide Separations), then an optional seal wash system might be something to include on your HPLC system. When combined with daily flushing of the HPLC system to remove buffers, a piston seal wash system can extend the life of and/or reduce the maintenance needed on your HPLC system. 

NOTE: If your HPLC system has a piston seal wash feature installed, then failure to utilize it on a regular basis (leaving it "dry"), may result in decreased lifetime of the pistons, wash and piston seals, plus leaks due to the added friction. If you have a piston seal wash system, but do not need it (i.e. running only NP solvents), then replace it with a non-seal wash system (manufacturers offer kits) or begin utilizing the piston seal wash feature to prevent damage.

To prevent the build up of buffer salt crystals inside of the narrow bore tubing, LC pump and other HPLC components we strongly recommend that you wash the system down each day, after use. We routinely see HPLC systems with large amounts of white fluffy crystals built up around the pump heads, pistons and various fittings from lack of daily maintenance. High concentrations of mobile phase containing salt buffers in your system (e.g. 0.1 M is considered 'high', but all buffers should be flushed out) can damage the pump's pistons, pump seals, injector parts and are corrosive to the stainless steel used. The resulting damage can lead to expensive repairs and lost time.

• Two types of flushing techniques can be employed to reduce the damage caused by these salt buffers and extend the life of the HPLC system. Flushing the entire HPLC flow path with a solution which does not contain any buffers ('water' to rinse it) and optionally, flushing the back side of the pump pistons using a piston "seal wash" system. Let us consider these two systems.
  

(1) Flushing the HPLC Flow Path: Potential damage from salts can be avoided if you remember to always flush down the entire flow path of your HPLC each day with a proper mixture of HPLC grade WATER plus some organic solvent (to prevent the growth of bacteria and/or mold). Flush the column down first with an appropriate solution to remove any buffers and then remove it from the flow path. Next flush the entire HPLC system down to rinse it of any remaining deposits (sometimes the column can be left in-line and flushed with the system. Consult with  the column manufacturer for advice). The exact flushing mixture to use will depend on the exact type of mobile phase you are using, but pure water is often a good initial choice. You want to select a solution which will dissolve ALL of the buffer used in your mobile phase back into the solution plus incorporate some organic solvent component to reduce the surface tension and also deter the growth of bacteria over time. For example: A common Reverse Phase (RP) wash solution of 80% HPLC Grade water and 20% Methanol can be used in many applications. If you have an automated HPLC system, then this entire process can be stored as a  "RP System Flush" method and programmed to run at the end of each day's sequence or series of runs so you do not have to remember to do it manually.

(2) Piston "Seal Wash": When running with buffers, the HPLC pump's pistons are coated with buffer solution. Over time, the liquid evaporates leaving a film of buffer salts deposited on the pistons. These salts accumulate and can scratch the piston surface or get stuck in the piston seals allowing air to enter the piston chamber and/or leaks to occur (drips from behind the piston seal). Early replacement of the pump head's piston seals and pistons often results from this damage. Washing the internal flow path of the HPLC system (as described in section #1 above) does not wash away all of these salt deposits. A piston"seal wash" system can be used to help wash the back-side of the piston washing away remaining deposits stuck to the piston. The piston seal wash pump's inlet line can be placed in a bottle containing fresh wash solution and through either an automatic timer feature set in the pump's software or through the operator manually turning the wash pump on and off (some systems just use gravity), it can wash the back of the piston area to rinse these deposits away. The rinse solution used to wash the pistons will depend on the type of mobile phase you are using (just like the HPLC flushing solvent). For most RP applications, I recommend a mixture of HPLC Grade Water and Methanol (50/50 to 80/20). Other common seal wash solutions might include: 80% HPLC Grade water and 20% IPA or 80% HPLC Grade water and 20% ACN. For most applications, I prefer using Methanol over IPA because it is much better at dissolving many of the buffers used. A third option would be to use a wash solvent which is the same as your mobile phase, but without any buffers added (try to include at least 20% organic content). Before starting, you must review your own methods to determine which general system wash and piston wash solution(s) are best as their is no such thing as a 'universal' wash solution that can be used with all methods.

If you are using Normal Phase (NP) applications, then the piston seal wash system can also be employed to keep the pistons 'wet' during operation and avoid excessive wear and noise (and that high pitched piston squeal noise), which are common when running dry solvents (e.g. Hexane). Manufacturers often provide special piston seals designed for use with normal phase solvents, but sometime the incorporation of the mobile phase as a seal wash solvent can help lubricate the pistons too. IPA can often be employed as a NP piston seal wash solvent as it is one of the best solutions to use in maintaining the seal over time (IPA is an excellent seal wash solvent for many NP applications). In any case, always make sure that the tubing used in your seal wash pumps is chemically compatible with the wash solution you choose.

• Piston Seal Wash SEALS: One final note about HPLC systems which use a "Seal Wash" system. Some designs (not all) incorporate a separate piston seal, behind the main pump head seal, to seal the rinse solution inside the wash area. Just like the piston seals at the front of the pump head, these wash seals require regular replacement. If your HPLC system uses a wash seal, be sure and have some extras on hand so they can be replaced when you service the pump head. Failure to replace these worn seals usually results in liquid leaking out the back of the pump head. This may be mistaken for a seal failure at the front of the pump head, so you need to be aware of their use to diagnose and repair any leaks correctly.