Agilent Quaternary Pump (e.g. G1311A ) "Secret" Operator Tip to FLUSH the HPLC Pump in 1/2 the time!

One of the most popular "tips" taught in our Agilent 1100 and 1200-series HPLC training classes shows users how to speed up the daily priming and flushing process of the Quaternary Pump. Many people use these pumps without taking advantage of the Quaternary pump's higher flow capability. If you are not currently using the higher 10mL/min flow rate capability offered by this pump (vs. the Binary pump's 5 mL/min), then you are missing out on a free time saving feature. Please read on to learn how to use this feature.

Based on the HP 1050 pump and introduced in 1995 as the "1100-series" version, the G1311  "Quat" pumps are one of the most popular research grade HPLC pumps found in laboratories today. They are extremely reliable, rugged, easy to operate and service. The Quat pump is driven by an easily accessible, single pump head with an in-series, servo controlled dual plunger and Multi-channel Gradient Valve ('MCGV') for 4-channel solvent proportioning with an active inlet valve (known as the 'AIV', first used in the HP 1050 pump and the reason for this pump's high reliability. No more "sticking" inlet valve issues!). Unlike the Agilent Binary pump (G1312), which uses two separate dual plunger pumps (2-channel) at up to 5.0 mL/min (maximum), the Quat pump offers an extended flow range, up to 10.0 mL/min (maximum). However, most users are not aware of this or do not know how to utilize this higher flow rate feature because the Quat pump defaults to a maximum flow rate of 5 mL/min at initialization. The ability to program the pump to operate at flow rates greater than 5 mL/min requires a "trick" to activate it (which apparently is a secret as we rarely encounter customers who are aware of how to use it). 

Let me share with you why you would want to use this feature, why the feature is hidden to most and of course HOW TO ACTIVATE IT on the Quat pump.

• Q: Why would you want to run the pump at 5 to 10 mL/min? Semi-prep columns can be run within this flow rate range, but a more common reason to operate at 10 mL/min is for daily system start-up. Anytime you replace or change the mobile phase bottle/solution OR when you startup the HPLC system (each day) one of the very first things you need to do is prime or flush each of the mobile phase channels, one-at-a-time through the system to waste. Air bleeds into the system when it is not used and this procedure primes the lines and pump head with fresh mobile phase preparing it for use. The system's flow path is directed to waste (via the open, prime-purge valve) during this step so back-pressure is not a concern. The higher the flow rate you can use for this flushing step, the sooner you can complete it. If you run the pump at 10 mL/min vs 5 mL/min, then flushing can be completed in half the time. This is especially useful if you have a model G1322A degasser module installed as the internal volume of each degassing channel in the G1322A is 10-12 mLs, requiring extended flushing times (4x channels = 30+ mLs flush per channel) before moving on to the next channel.

• Q: Why does the Quat pump initialize with a reduced, 5 mL/min maximum flow rate? The Quat pump was designed to meet two different operating pressure ranges. From 0 to 5 mL/min the permitted operating pressure range is 0 - 40 MPa (0 - 400 bar). Above 5 mL/min, the operating pressure range is reduced, 0 - 20 MPa (0 - 200 bar). As most analytical chromatography is performed at flow rates below 5 mL/min, the system initializes using the more practical, 0 - 400 bar range, limiting flow rates to 5 mL/min maximum. The default maximum pressure field is set to 400 bars. You should always change the maximum pressure value from 400 bars to a more realistic maximum pressure (lower value) for your method. Use a maximum value that is appropriate for your own method. *The only time you will want to set it to the maximum value is when conducting a Pump Pressure/Leak test (it must be set to max pressure for testing).
  

• Q: When I try and enter a pump flow rate larger than 5 mL/min, the system does not accept it. How do I program the pump to increase the flow rate past 5 mL to 10 mL/min? In order for the system to accept a flow rate of greater than 5 mL/min, you must FIRST set the maximum pressure limit to a value that is 200 bars or less (within the allowed "0 - 20 MPa (0 - 200 bar)" range). Once the maximum pressure limit has been reduced in the method, the system will then allow you to enter a higher flow rate such as 9.999 mL/min (10 mL/min). As long as the maximum pressure alarm is set within this window (200 or less), the pump will allow flow rates above 5 mL/min to be used. Now you can program the pump to flush lines or prime the system at twice the speed of the Binary pump equipped systems (10 mL/min).

Please share this "trick" with other users of the G1311A, G1311B, G1311C versions of this pump so they can maximize their time and productivity. Let us know if you find this tip useful.

Adjusting the HPLC Gradient Time For Changes in Column Diameter and/or Length (same particle size)

Changes to the column diameter (to scale the method up or down) can be calculated. For an established HPLC method using the same support type (same exact material and particle size) where the column dimensions and flow rate are known. Note: If only the diameter changes and the lengths remain the same (proper linear flow rates used in both cases), then the resulting gradient times will also be similar. If the column lengths change, then the gradient time will change.

Changes to the Gradient Time (Tg2) used for a second column which has a different diameter, "Dc2" and/or length, "Lc2" can be calculated if you know: 

• Tg1 [Time, of initial Gradient on Column #1];
• Tg2 [Time of second Gradient on Column #2];
  
• Fc1 [Flow Rate of Column 1] ;
• Fc2 [Flow Rate of Column 2];
• Dc1 [Diameter of Column 1]
• Dc2 [Diameter of Column 2];
• Lc1 [Length of Column 1];
• Lc2 [Length of Column 2].

        Tg2 = Tg1 x (Fc1 / Fc2) x (Dc2² / Dc1²) x (Lc2 / Lc1)

 

Example: Initial Method utilizes a 4.6 x 150 mm, 5u column run at 1.00 mL/min with a 10 minute gradient program and we wish to transfer this gradient method over to a column with a 2.1 mm diameter (ID) x 100 mm column run at 200 ul/min.

   Tg2 = 10 x (1 / 0.2) x (2.1² / 4.6²) x (100 /150)

   Tg2 = 10 x (5) x (4.41/21.16) x (0.67) 

   Tg2 =  50 x 0.208 x 0.67

   Tg2 =  6.97 minutes.

The gradient time used on the 2.1 x 100 mm column run at 0.200 mL/min would be ~ 7 minutes (vs 10 minutes on the 4.6 x 150 mm column at 1 mL/min).

 

NOTE: A note about optimized flow rates. If the Column PARTICLE SIZE changes, esp from greater than 3.5 u to less than 3.5 u, then the optimized flow rate may also change too. Please refer to my article; 

• "Speed Up HPLC Analysis Time Using Higher than "Normal" Flow Rates with SMALLER Particles" for more information.

GC-MS Contamination Identification and Sources

Over the past few months I have received a number of questions regarding the identification and possible sources of contamination observed in GC-MS systems (GC/MSD, EI). Contamination can be sourced to the instrument itself or to materials used in the preparation of samples. We shall review a few of the most common types of contamination observed and how you can use the MS detector data to identify them in this article.

Air Leaks / Contamination: The GC-MS detector operates under vacuum conditions so air must be kept to a minimum detectable level. 

• Common Sources: Improper fitting connections; improper fitting materials/age; damaged or worn vacuum seals. 
• Identification: High background noise levels (poor S/N of stds); Peaks associated with air (i.e. m/z 18, 28, 32, 44).

Acetone Cleaning Fluid Contamination: Often used to clean the metal parts of the source, acetone may appear in the signal. Look for peaks at m/z 43 & 58.

Dimethylpolysiloxane Contamination/Bleed: Silicone from the various seals and septa may appear and depending on the chemical source, are often detected at m/z 147, 207,221, 281,295,355 & 429. *Always use high quality seals & inject blanks often to check for contamination.

Plasticizer Contamination: Many plastics are used in the seals found in the GC-MS instrument. These plastics may eventually bleed into the system and be detected (due to normal wear, heat stress or even poor sample preparation). It is critical to identify which ones result from worn out seals vs. use of plastics as part of improper sample preparation procedures (e.g. improper handling techniques, glove material, plastic sample tubes, washing glassware with soaps etc). One of the most common peaks observed will be m/z 149 (Phthalate).

Diffusion Pump Oil Fluid Contamination: Turning off the carrier gas flow may allow for some of the diffusion pump oil to back-stream. *Maintain carrier gas flow when this system is ON. If diffusion pump oil has entered the source, you should observe a strong signal peak (e.g. m/z 262, 446 for the oil).

Foreline Pump Oil Fluid Contamination: Look up the specific chemical composition of the oil used to obtain applicable m/z values to check for (e.g. hydrocarbons, m/z 69 ...).

*Avoid GC-MS contamination and trouble by first receiving the proper training to operate, use and maintain the GC-MS system. This includes making sure the entire system is fully maintained, seals changed, performance monitored regularly, insuring all of the vacuum pump oils are changed on a regular schedule and always use high quality replacement parts. Maintenance is something that most users can perform themselves, especially if they have completed a formal hands-on training class using their own GC-MS system (Most manufacturers offer basic on-site Maintenance classes).

Troubleshooting HPLC Gradient Valve / Proportioning Valve / MCGV GPV Leaks. How to Identify Them.

HPLC pumps which utilize low-pressure mixing VALVES are known by names such as: "Ternary" (3-solvents) or "Quaternary" (4-solvents) pumps.These types of HPLC pump configurations use a single, high-pressure pump head coupled to a multi-port / proportioning valve and represent some of the most popular and versatile pump configurations offered. Featuring random access to multiple solvent bottles (more than two is always better), lower operating costs and less maintenance work provides you with one of the best platforms to develop new methods on. I highly recommend them for most, but not all, HPLC applications (vs. Dual pump, high-pressure "Binary Pumps").

• If your HPLC system utilizes a single, high-pressure pump head coupled to a multi-port valve, then please remember that in addition to pump head maintenance, regular maintenance of the multi-port / proportioning valve is also required.

A few weeks ago I was hired by well known Pharma company to solve a gradient method problem that I was told has stumped their best scientists for almost one year. The client presented me with their validated UHPLC method which suddenly developed a shift in retention time of all peaks. The shift was significant, about 10% of the previous values over a 20 minute run, and had been observed on two different, but similarly configured HPLC systems in their lab. Changing the column to a new one showed no change on either HPLC system. They were out of ideas.

• Before I reveal the cause of the trouble, let us briefly think about what types of changes can result in a small, repeatable shifts of peak retention times. Four common ones that come to mind are: 

(1) Flow Rate changes;

(2) Column Temperature changes;

(3) Column Fouling;

(4) Mobile phase composition changes. 

Start the troubleshooting by ruling out the easy causes first (#1, 2 and 3 above).  

• (1) Flow Rate: When the actual flow rate is in question, start by measuring it manually Never trust the instrument's display screen value or the software's value for flow rate. Measure it. An easy way to measure the flow rate involves timing the amount of liquid that exits the HPLC detector line after a defined period of time. For example: If your flow rate is set at 1.000 ml/minute, then using water, measure the time it takes to fill a 10mL graduated cylinder to the 5 mL line. It must take exactly 5.00 minutes (= 1.00 mL/min). Run this flow test on each pump channel.
  
• (2) Temperature: The HPLC method should be run under controlled column temperature conditions. Verify this. Retention times are a function of temperature (i.e. cooler temps usually result in longer retention times, warmer = shorter). The temperature should be stable (~ 1 or 2 degrees C).
  
• (3) Column Fouling: To prevent fouling, wash the HPLC column with a solution that is STRONGER than the mobile phase after each analysis. Use fresh, clean solutions. Verify that the samples are dissolved in the mobile phase (100% dissolved) and filtered before injection. Verify that the injection volume is less than ~3% of the column volume and the concentration of the sample is not too high (avoid saturating or overloading the column). Solubility is very important for both the sample and any additives used in the mobile phase (to prevent precipitation). Anything that "fouls" the column support will directly effect the retention times and often the peak shape too. Be aware of these causes and take action to avoid them.  *Replacing a suspect column with a new one is often an inexpensive way of troubleshooting a "peak" problem. Always have a NEW spare column on hand for testing. *Columns are consumable items.
  

• (4) Mobile Phase: Changes to the actual amounts of additives, pH or final composition of the mobile phase may impact peak retention times (sometimes, the peak shape too). After all, the final composition used was developed for the purpose of establishing a reliable and reproducible method of analysis. It must be controlled. We must take steps to insure the mobile phase preparation and delivery are accurate. Always prepare fresh solutions each day (esp. all aqueous solutions!). pH values may change after a few days (e.g. even in MeOH / acidic solutions), bacteria/mold/algae grow quickly in many solutions, even in the refrigerator, so only prepare what you need for the day. Evaporation of more volatile solvents (in pre-mixed solutions) can change their actual concentration (always protect them from heat and evaporation).
  

*There is another way that the mobile phase composition can change which often goes unseen. It can change during delivery to the column. The HPLC's low pressure proportioning valve that allows us to easily select and use different solvents can develop small internal leaks, resulting in valve cross-flow leakage. This cross-flow leakage allows liquid (or air, if the line is not connected) to be drawn out of one channel and into another, changing the actual mobile phase composition. This happens because the valve seals, esp if they have been left unused for a long time, can change shape (e.g. shrink) and begin to leak over time. Often the amount of leakage is very small (ul/min), but depending on the method, a small change may result in a significant change to the chromatography.

I reviewed the client's method parameters and concluded that the method met good chromatography fundamentals. Checking the flow rate (using a graduated cylinder) confirmed the flow rate was accurately shown. A review of their mobile phase preparation procedures and methods also appeared OK. Degassing of mobile phase and column temperature were also satisfactory. 

As I looked more closely at the two running HPLC instruments they used, I began to quickly zero in on the most likely problem. 

• A long stream of air bubbles were observed exiting the HPLC pump's gradient valve leading into the high pressure pump head, but no air bubbles were seen exiting the degasser's outlet line (IOW: The vacuum degasser may or may not be the cause, though it is critical to insure the degasser is clean and fully serviced before use. Have the degasser professionally serviced first before proceeding with troubleshooting. Using a damaged degasser will make it difficult to use the pump or run any valid tests as degassed solution is needed). This was observed on several of their HPLC systems, including the two used for this method. The fittings connecting the lines from the degasser module to the valve were correctly connected (as a loose connection would cause air to leak in and must be quickly ruled out). 

The cause was from one or more of the unused gradient valve positions leaking air into the flow path, changing the mobile phase composition. Of four possible mobile phase lines available (A,B,C,D), the client only had two lines connected to mobile phase bottles (A,B) with the remaining two lines left open to the air. The internal valve seals in the unused 'C' and 'D' valve positions had deformed, shrinking in size, sticking,leaking, allowing air to flow into the mobile phase on one of the channels. This resulted in a change of the organic composition % used in the method (due to a cross-flow leak), changing the peak retention times (as the actual mobile phase composition used in their gradient was different). I directed the HPLC pump's outlet line to waste, placed all of the solvent pickup bottle lines (A,B,C,D) in a beaker filled with IPA and allowed the pump to run pure IPA at 1 mL/min across each channel, one-at-a-time (100%), for ~ 20 minutes to re-hydrate the internal gradient valve seals. This was repeated with each valve position, then all of the lines were placed in fresh mobile phase solution, primed and flushed. The system was restarted and the method now ran showing the expected peak retention times. Instructions were provided which included regularly using all of the channels and valve positions plus flushing weekly to maintain valve operation. Use ALL of the lines and flush the valve(s) through all positions, one-at-a-time, on a regular basis. If prolonged flushing with pure IPA does not fix the leak, then it is time to replace the valve. All valves eventually wear out and must be included in maintenance inspections and checks. This is especially true when you purchase your HPLC system at an auction or from an 'equipment' reseller. Never assume that the 10+ year old HPLC valve is OK. Test it first (e.g. Acetone tracer test).

 

Acetone Tracer Test: If you suspect that a cross-flow leak exists on a gradient valve, then one method I use to check for leakage is to mix up a "Tracer" solution of pure organic (often ACN) that has 1% Acetone mixed in (for RP methods). Remove the column and replace with a restriction capillary. Place the tracer solution on the valve position you suspect may be leaking at an appropriate flow rate and set it for 0%. Run one of the other channels with 100% (pure ACN in this example) and monitor the UV (265nm) for the presence of acetone. If the acetone leaks into the channel you are using, it will be easy to observe on the UV trace. So called "bubble" tests (introducing and monitoring the position of a gas bubble into the low pressure solvent line) are not reliable leak detection methods for small leaks. Use a tracer such as acetone to find the leaking channel(s). You can read more about these types of Valve Leakage tests in this article (Click Here).