HPLC Retention Time Drift, Change, Area Variability or Poor Reproducibility. Common Reasons for it.

Retention times and area measurements must be reproducible from run to run. When problems are observed, late, early or variable retention times (and/or peak area values) may be observed. Variation outside of acceptable limits indicates a problem with the sample preparation, method design, function of the HPLC system or a lack of training. Here are several commonly observed reasons why sample (or standard) peak retention times or peak area values may not be reproducible:

(1) TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS:

To obtain reproducible results, the temperature of the HPLC column must be kept constant or controlled during each analysis. Laboratory room temperatures can vary up and down by several degrees during the course of one day and these changes will often change the retention characteristics of the sample(s). The 'On' and 'Off' cycling of power from an air conditioner or heating unit will often cause the baseline to drift in a cyclical manner, up and down, during the day (this can often be seen as a clear sine wave pattern when you zoom-in to study the baseline trace over time). Temperature also changes the refractive index of the mobile phase. Optical (Light) based detectors (i.e. UV/VIS, RI...) will show this change as drift up or down). In some cases, a temperature change of plus or minus one degree C from run-to-run can cause changes in retention times which effect reliability of the method. 

To reduce temperature fluctuations, you must control the temperature of the column and mobile phase (if applicable) during the analysis. This is most commonly done by: (a) using fully equilibrated mobile phase at the start of the day or analysis, (b) keeping the interconnecting lines as short as possible (esp. any which exit the column and go to detectors/flow cells), (c) insulating any stainless steel lines with plastic tubing sleeves to reduce heat loss and (d) using a thermostatted column compartment to maintain the column at a single set temperature throughout the day. Control of the column temperature will remove 'temperature' as a variable from your analysis. Method analysis temperature should be constant from run to run, not a variable. Be sure and document the temperature selected as part of your method. 

(2) INADEQUATE MOBILE PHASE MIXING:

Both high pressure (with separate pumps) and low pressure pumping (one pump with a proportioning valve module) systems depend on efficient mixing to accurately meter the requested mobile phase composition. For gradient analysis, failure to completely mix the mobile phase solution before it enters the HPLC column often results in excessive baseline noise, spikes and poor Retention time reproducibility. If your mobile phase composition changes, then the chromatography will change too (e.g. evaporation of the more volatile organic phase from an open bottle may result in a change in composition). "Mixing" is often accomplished directly in a mixer installed in the flow path of an HPLC pump (For more info, please read this article on selecting a mixer). The associated noise and ripple of incomplete mixing can reduce the limit of detection (LOD) and increase integration error. This mixer is often a static mixer (a simple 'Tee', a tube filled with baffles, a frit or beads, valve orifice or microfluidic device) of low volume design for chromatography use, but allows adequate mixing of the liquids within a prescribed flow rate range. The best mixers incorporate longitudinal and radial mixing in-line. A mixer with too low a volume or of insufficient design can result in poor mixing of the mobile phase (note: incorrect solvent compressibility settings can also cause mixing, flow instability and noise problems too). To reduce mixing problems, first insure that the mobile phases used are fully soluble with each other. Next, make sure that any mixer used is appropriate for the flow rates and volumes you will be using. Monitor the baseline for drift, ripple and artifacts in real time to spot problems and make adjustments to correct them. 

(3) INADEQUATE MOBILE PHASE DEGASSING:

For the best results, continuously degass your mobile phase. Reducing the amount of gas in solution will also improve signal to noise levels of detection, reduce Retention time drift and reduce pump cavitation. If you are using an electronic vacuum degassing module, make sure it is maintained and working 100%. A faulty degasser may cause more damage to your system and methods. Maintain and Repair them just as you do for your other instrument modules. Gas bubbles may cause the inlet or outlet check valves to malfunction (get stuck), baseline noise spikes to appear randomly, flow rates and/or back pressure values to become irregular, detector outputs to show high levels of noise (from air in the flow cell) and also cause the loss of prime or cavitation in pumps. To achieve the best balance of low noise levels and high reliability, both aqueous and organic mobile phases should be fully degassed. This can be accomplished through stand alone vacuum degassing modules or through gentle helium gas sparging. In all cases, degassing must be continuous (not just done one time). Continuous degassing reduces cyclical noise and signal variations. For this reason, I do not recommend using ultrasonic baths to degass mobile phase solutions as these are not used continuously. The mobile phase solution starts to re-absorb gas as soon as you stop sonicating the solution. This results in continuous baseline drift.

Removal of gasses is critical to the function of a modern HPLC pumping system. The liquids used are compressed to very high levels which forces out solubilized gas from the solutions. This is best accomplished before the liquid is transferred into the pump. These gas bubbles must be minimized to achieve desirable baselines. *Even if you use a high pressure pumping system, an inline degassing system reduces the amount of noise and baseline drift. Properly maintain and service your degasser to insure compliant operation. IOW: Always degas your mobile phase solutions.

 

(4) SYSTEM LEAKS or FLOW RATE INSTABILITY:

If the peak retention times have increased over time, one possible reason for this change could be a leak. If your flow rate is reduced by a leak, then the retention times will be longer. Always be alert to this pattern of change and check for any signs of leaks on a regular basis. If you find a leak, do not use the HPLC system until it has been repaired. If there is no leak, then the flow rate may not be what you think it is. 

When the actual flow rate is in question, start by checking it manually (never trust the instrument's display screen or the software value for flow rate. Measure it). An easy way to measure the flow rate involves timing the amount of liquid that exits the HPLC detector line after a defined period of time. For example: If your flow rate is set at 1.000 ml/minute, measure the time it takes to fill a 10ml graduated cylinder. It must take exactly 10.00 minutes.

Inadequate degassing, sticking check valves and/or incorrect solvent compressibility values may also cause flow instability.

(5) COLUMN FOULING: 

One of the most common reasons for changes in retention times or area values of well established peak(s) are due to column contamination and fouling of the support material (or of the inlet frit, guard column). The most common reason for this to happen is due to a lack of column flushing or washing after each analysis (esp when running only isocratic methods). Samples that have been poorly prepared, not filtered or were sourced from a complex matrix (i.e. clinical samples) often contain many compounds which are in-addition to the compound of interest. These materials can be retained on the column and not eluted off during each analysis. They build up over time and cause all kinds of strange problems, including changing retention times, new peaks seen and poor overall or wide peak shapes. 

Gradient analysis provides an opportunity to make sure you use a strong enough mobile phase to elute everything off the column during the run. Make sure you ramp up to a high enough concentration of solvent and use a "hold time" to insure this.

Isocratic analysis is a worst case situation for this to occur as the mobile phase is not ramped up to a strong solvent at the end of the method to push off any late eluters, Instead, they accumulate on the column. 

If you use isocratic methods to analyze samples, then you must follow each analysis run with a second, and separate from your analysis method, "column only wash step". This method does not inject any sample. Instead, it uses a strong wash solution which is compatible with your column AND is well known to dissolve any accumulated material into solution and elute it all off the column. For NP applications an alcohol (e.g. MeOH) may be suitable for this job and for RP applications ACN or even MeCl may be be appropriate. Check with the column manufacturer to find out which wash solutions should be used (do not guess, base it on actual sample solubility). 

(6) SAMPLE OVERLOADING (or too large an Injection volume/concentration for the column): If you inject (load) more sample than the column can hold (as determined by a proper loading study), then the peak that results will often be broader in width with more tailing (from diffusion). This will result in a peak which elutes later than expected, fouls the column and results in poor reproducibility.  Be sure to inject the sample dissolved in the mobile phase (or a solution that is weaker than the mobile phase).

(7) SAMPLE INJECTION VOLUME VARIATION: The injection volume used must be appropriate for the type of injector used. All injectors have a stated range in which they are most accurate. Make sure you are injecting within this ideal range and not at the extreme ends of the range (larger error). Manual injectors with fixed loops should be overfilled (3x) for best results. Autosampler vials must be correctly chosen to be compatible with the injector used, contain an excess of liquid and have a loose cap to prevent evaporation or a vacuum from forming inside the vial. *Test injector accuracy and reproducibility separately, at the volume used for your analysis, as part of your method development review. *Review my article on HPLC injectors for more information.

(8) Changes in the pH OF the MOBILE PHASE: Samples containing ionizable compounds are strongly effected by the pH of your mobile phase. Solutions should be prepared fresh, each day (*acids in solvent may change over time). Buffer capacity is often overlooked (the ability to resist pH change). It is highest at the pKa of the acid/base. Try to work within ±1 pH unit of the buffers pKa value for the best pH control of the mobile phase. If your mobile phase is buffered too far away from its pKa, then poor peak shape or variable retention times are often the result. Note: Weakly ionizable samples can be very sensitive to changes of as little as 0.1 pH unit. 

HPLC System Dead (Dwell) Volume. Is It Static or Can It Change During a Method? Autoinjectors and Gradients.

I recently read a post on a popular LinkedIn chromatography group where a user asked "if it is possible for the total system volume of their HPLC system to change during a method? Would it effect sample retention times? If so, how? If not, why?" Almost all of the group members who responded to the question said that it was impossible for the system volume to change once the HPLC system was installed! Note, we are referring to the HPLC "System" volume, not the column volume in this question. Column volume is fixed, but the total system volume is not fixed. Another reason why you should not believe everything you read on the web! The question tests your practical knowledge of how HPLC systems operate (specifically, how HPLC injectors operate).

The numerous and incorrect responses posted to the initial question made me realize that this would be an excellent job interview question for chromatographers seeking employment. The question certainly tests the users practical knowledge of liquid chromatography hardware and systems. An intermediate or advanced level user with a few years of experience should have the practical knowledge of the HPLC system flow path and how it effects sample retention times and method development to know the answer. A novice user would not be expected to have this same level of practical knowledge and answer incorrectly. Additionally, most chromatography books only address concepts and fundamentals, but to be a good chromatographer you also need a great deal of practical hands-on knowledge about the how the chromatography hardware operates. This information is obtained through receiving proper training and practical hands-on experience running a wide variety of methods with real samples to solve complex problems. This is a very 'hands-on' technique.

To get back to the original question posed, "if it is possible for the system volume of their HPLC system to change during a method?" Knowledge about column void volume, system swept volume (system dwell volume), gradient composition delays and most importantly of all, how the flow path is manipulated in an autoinjector (or a manual injection valve) to inject a sample into the flow path are all needed to formulate an answer. Which parts of an HPLC system contribute to the total system dwell volume? The total volume of liquid contained in the system from the inside of the pump head to the column and detector inlet or flow cell contribute to the total system volume. These parts are pre-plumbed. The mobile phase mixer and/or pulse dampener are two parts (e.g. ~300 ul) which may contribute a significant percentage of the volume up to the column head. However, of more concern in this case and also a significant contributor of total delay volume in an HPLC system is the injection loop (usually ~100 ul). For manual injection and auto-injector valves, this loop is of a fixed volume, but allows for partial filling (though the loops used are not really accurately measured as the metering device is responsible for most of the volume accuracy). For both types of valves, the loop volume should be at least as large as the largest volume needed (e.g. 100 ul size is common). If the loop size is 100 ul and you only inject 1 ul of sample into a std loop of 100 ul, then you are placing your 1 ul sample up against a slug of 99 ul of mobile phase. While this dilutes the sample and allows some diffusion to take place, spreading out the sample (not ideal), when injected into a  typical 4.6 x 250 mm, 5u column (which has a volume of ~ 2.90 mls), it normally has very little negative effect on the chromatography seen. The effect can be dramatically different when using a tiny column with a small volume (e.g. 2.1 x 50 mm, 3u). The diffusion effect can result in very wide peak widths resulting in poor loading and resolution. A physically smaller volume loop is needed to improve the performance.

However, when we run a gradient analysis another effect is introduced, gradient delay. The mobile phase composition is mixed at the pump head outlets or in a mixer after the pump(s). It takes a specific amount of time for this mixture to reach the head of the column. This time delay is known as the gradient delay. The flow rate and the volume of liquid contained in the tubing from where the liquid is mixed to the head of column determines how long this delay lasts. Since the flow rate normally remains fixed during a method, the total volume of liquid between these two points is the critical value we are interested in. The larger the volume, the longer the delay before the mobile phase composition reaches the column head.

• Gradient Delay Example: Flow rate = 1.00 ml/min; Volume between pump and head of column is 0.300 mls. Delay volume is 300 ul and the Gradient Delay Time would be 0.3 minutes. So the mobile phase composition that we programmed into the pump does not actually reach the column until 0.3 minutes after we programmed it to occur.  

Depending on the value of this volume, the delay from the time the gradient program starts until the gradient reaches the head of the column will vary. This is a critical concept to understand when developing gradient methods and especially when transferring gradient methods to other HPLC systems (as different systems have different dwell volumes). This poses a minor inconvenience to method development and we need to take it into account so we program composition changes with enough time in between them to allow the changes we programmed to have time to take place and cause the desired effect.

How do we change the volume of the Autoinjector (or manual injector) without re-plumbing the system? One of the most common methods used to reduce the total flow path volume of an autoinjector is to program the injector to switch the injection loop (which has a large volume) out of the flow path immediately after the injection, instead of leaving it directly in the flow path for the remainder of the method. Remove the loop and you subtract the loop volume from the total dwell volume. This will reduce the total system volume (dwell volume) at the start of the method which will also reduce the total gradient delay observed. The newly mixed solvent composition will arrive at the column head sooner. *Using the previous example of a system with a 300 ul gradient delay volume, toggling the injection valve to switch out the 100 ul loop from the flow path would reduce the total delay volume by one third, from 300 ul to 200 ul. So this illustrates a well known technique to change the total system dead volume (dwell volume) of an HPLC system without manually re-plumbing it. Most autosamplers (autoinjectors) provide this loop "toggle" feature as standard in their software menus for exactly this purpose. It can also be time-programmed into most injector's (if no "feature" or menu option is available) and can also be employed with manual injection valves too by placing them back in the "Load" position after injection.

Summary: Can the HPLC system swept volume be changed during a run? YES it can. 
How? One of the easiest ways is by switching the injection loop out of the flow path during the analysis.

Vacuum Pressure Units Conversion Table

Several of the questions I receive each week by email deal with scientific calculations or conversion of various units. One popular request relates to the conversion of micrograms, ppm and percent. Several years ago to address this question, I posted a table of weight to ppm units ("Conversion Factors microgram, nanogram, ppm, ppb and percent") which has proven to be very popular.

Because of the large number of vacuum pumps attached to HPLC and MS systems, another common conversion question relates to vacuum units. Due to the different applications and regions of the world, the desired unit often varies. It is for this reason that I develop unit conversion tables as I find these tables provide for a convenient way to print out and/or keep handy in a binder for future reference. Widespread computer use coupled to freely available page reader software (e.g. Adobe PDF) provides another means to store useful information as a pdf file too. I present this "Vacuum Pressure Units Conversion Table" in a viewable and an optionally available downloadable form [click HERE to download].

VACUUM PRESSURE UNITS CONVERSION TABLE:

*Some of the more commonly used values are shown in boldface type. ** Absolute Vacuum..

% Vacuum	Torr (mm Mercury)	kPa abs	Inches of Mercury	Micron	PSI
0.0	760.0	101.4	0.00	760,000	14.7
1.3	750.0	99.9	0.42	750,000	14.5
1.9	735.6	97.7	1.02	735,600	14.2
7.9	700.0	93.5	2.32	700,000	13.5
21.0	600.0	79.9	6.32	600,000	11.6
34.0	500.0	66.7	10.22	500,000	9.7
47.0	400.0	53.2	14.22	400,000	7.7
50.0	380.0	50.8	14.92	380,000	7.3
61.0	300.0	40	18.12	300,000	5.8
74.0	200.0	26.6	22.07	200,000	3.9
87.0	100.0	13.3	25.98	100,000	1.93
88.0	90.0	12	26.38	90,000	1.74
89.5	80.0	10.7	26.77	80,000	1.55
90.8	70.0	9.3	27.16	70,000	1.35
92.1	60.0	8	27.56	60,000	1.16
93.0	51.7	6.9	27.89	51,700	1.00
93.5	50.0	6.7	27.95	50,000	0.97
94.8	40.0	5.3	28.35	40,000	0.77
96.1	30.0	4	28.74	30,000	0.58
96.6	25.4	3.4	28.92	25,400	0.49
97.4	20.0	2.7	29.14	20,000	0.39
98.7	10.0	1.3	29.53	10,000	0.193
99.0	7.6	1.0	29.62	7,600	0.147
99.87	1.0	0.13	29.88	1,000	0.01934
99.90	0.75	0.1	29.89	750	0.0145
99.99	0.10	0.013	29.916	100	0.00193
99.999	0.01	0.0013	29.9196	10	0.000193
100	0.00	0	29.92	0	0

Terminology. Which is it? "UPLC" (TM) , UHPLC or HPLC? The correct name is still HPLC.

Proper terminology is very important in science. Brand names or trademarks should not be confused with the names of techniques or methods. I sometimes hear and see people misuse the terms "UPLC^TM " and/or "UHPLC" so think we need a short post to clarify the correct use of these terms. Here are some basic definitions of the terms plus background.

"LC" or Liquid Chromatography. A general name for any type of chromatography where liquid is used as a the carrier phase and a solid support is used as the media, often packed into a tube.

 "LPLC" or  Low Pressure Liquid Chromatography. LPLC often includes chromatography analysis using glass or plastic columns with very large particle support beads run at pressures ranging from atmospheric (gravity driven) to several hundred psi (~ 30 bars max, but more commonly just a few bars). Very large particles are required in this application to aid flow through the support, which in some cases is gravity driven, but in others, a small pump is required to push the mobile phase through the column.

"HPLC" or High Performance Liquid Chromatography: *Used to be called High Pressure Liquid Chromatography to differentiate it from the previous term "LPLC". Now we refer to it as "high performance" chromatography, though both terms are technically correct. Compared to the very large media used in LPLC (mm), HPLC uses micron sized support particles packed under very high pressures in stainless steel (note: sometimes strong rigid plastic columns are used for biocompatible applications) columns to enhance the resolution obtained by many orders of magnitude. As such, the more popular definition changed from "High Pressure" to "High Performance" Liquid Chromatography to emphasize this improvement, but once again the technique itself did not change (marketing). Today, we still refer to all modes of high pressure liquid chromatography separation techniques as "HPLC" or sometimes just "LC". The most commonly used HPLC pumps are rated between 400 and 600 bars maximum pressure (with some capable of 1,200+ bars) though in normal use, we rarely run methods which use pressures over 300 bars.

"UHPLC" or Ultra-High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (or Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography) has become both a new marketing term and perhaps a subcategory of HPLC (other subcategory examples include: nano-HPLC, narrow-bore HPLC, and mini-bore HPLC). UHPLC is presently defined as the use of sub-2 μm particles with a low dispersion HPLC system, optionally with a pump capable of > 600 bars pressure. UHPLC is still HPLC. Nothing changed except it implies you will use sub 2-micron particles in the column (in other words, just the particle size is highlighted). Many methods which use sub-2 μm particle columns can and are run on a low-dispersion HPLC systems at pressures which do not exceed 400 or 600 bars [For more information, please read: "Pressure Drop Across an HPLC / UHPLC Column"]. The technique used in all cases is still correctly called HPLC and should be described as such in papers, articles etc. 

• For example: We have been using narrow bore columns (2.1 mm ID) containing small particle supports for more than 30 years and never changed the name of the technique used each time we changed the column support type used (e.g. 20u, 10u, 5u, 3.5u, 2,5u, 2.2u...). As a matter of fact, in the late 1980's and early 1990's there was a bug push to use 1.0, 2.1 and 3.5 mm ID columns with 3.5u and smaller particles on low dispersion systems to both save solvent, increase performance and reduce run times. This required the use of HPLC systems which were optimized with low dispersion flow paths such as the Hewlett-Packard model 1090 HPLC system (DR5 pumps). Perhaps the technology and methods came too early? Columns with very small particles proved difficult to pack (poor RSD batch to batch). The solvent savings and reduced run times just did not interest people at that time and after a few years, the lack of interest resulted in few commercial columns being available with these properties (I recall packing many of them myself in the lab).

"UPLC^TM" or Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography is a Trademark of the Waters Corporation. Waters Corporation uses it as a marketing term for their own product technology. Defined by Waters as, "the use of sub-2 μm particle columns in combination with low dispersion, high pressure (15,000 psi or 1,034 bar) instrumentation". The confusion seems to come from: (1) New users of HPLC who think that the name "UPLC^" is the name of the technique OR (2) HPLC user unfamiliar with other brands of instruments, using the Water's trademark of "UPLC" to describe the technique of HPLC or an HPLCinstrument with a pump which is capable of exceeding 600 bars pressure OR having a low dispersion flow path. They should be using the term HPLC in all of these cases or optionally, UHPLC, another general marketing term, not "UPLC" (unless they really are referring to a Waters product name or specifically, technology).

Summary: In general, as long as the back pressure is above ~30 bars and/or you are using packed LC columns with particles less than ~ 50 microns in diameter (newer, monolithic supports and superficially porous particles also qualify), then the technique used is always called HPLC. If you are using sub-2μm particles and the system operating pressures for the method are at or above 600 bars, then the term "UHPLC" could be used as well (not UPLC^® unless you are specifically using a Waters Corp "UPLC" branded system under the same conditions described), but the term HPLC is far more accurate. You are always correct describing the techniques used as HPLC and we encourage you do so in all articles, papers and discussions.Key take away ... Changing the particle size of the support used AND/OR operating with system back-pressures above 600 bars does not change the name of the technique used (It is still "HPLC"). Please do not confuse marketing names (created in the hope of selling more systems) with the actual name of the analytical technique.