HPLC UV - VIS Wavelength Accuracy Check (" Calibration ") Notes

To verify correct detector wavelength accuracy of your HPLC UV / VIS module it is periodically necessary to measure the wavelength accuracy against know standards using an appropriate SOP ("fit for purpose"). This may be required as part of a Performance Verification (PV), Installation Qualification (IQ) or Operational Qualification (OQ). 

Wavelength accuracy may be adversely affected (or change) when an UV/VIS detector is serviced/repaired, moved, suffers a physical shock (bumped), large temperature changes occur, a lamp or other optical component is changed, a flow cell is changed, the optics become dirty or contaminated, or due to normal wear and age. The wavelength accuracy of any applicable detectors (e.g. UV, VIS, UV/VIS, DAD, PDA) should be measured on a regular basis as part of "Good Laboratory Practices" (GLP). Depending on the regulations or guidelines applied, most authorities require accuracy to be within 2 to 3 nm of a certified standard within the range used. In practice, we generally achieve accuracy of equal to or better than 0.5 nm across a range of UV / VIS wavelengths. Following good laboratory practice (GLP) requires that we establish the frequency and conditions which determine when they should be verified. Complete documentation of these wavelength checks which describe their purpose, specificity, application and detailed procedures (SOP) should be reviewed.

We present a few suggestions in how to measure the detector wavelength accuracy of your HPLC UV / VIS module. 

• Built-In Test Methods: Most instrument manufacturers incorporate one or more wavelength accuracy checks directly built into their detectors. This allows quick and accurate measurement of the detector's wavelength accuracy for one or more wavelengths in an automated fashion. Most instruments utilize built-in filters (e.g. holmium oxide) which have been treated with chemicals to provide repeatable wavelength spectra which can be used to determine the accuracy of the detector (and adjust it to within specification in most cases, too). If your instrument has one or more of these built-in test filters, then follow the manufacturer's instructions for using them to measure the wavelength accuracy of your detector. 

• Using a solution of high purity ANTHRACENE: Dissolved in an HPLC grade alcohol (i.e. Methanol ) or Acetonitrile (for low UV checks), anthracene has a lambda max of 251 nm. A solution concentration of ~ 1 ug / mL for HPLC use can be injected using a standardized method (SOP) and the area% evaluated, one-at-a-time, at several different wavelengths (for VWD or single wavelength detectors) as follows: 249, 250, 251, 252, 253 nm. Relative to the baseline, the areas should show a peak at 251 nm. If you have a scanning UV/VIS detector (aka: DAD or PDA), then you can scan all wavelengths around the 251 nm region and plot the results using just one run to obtain the same type of data.

• Using a solution of high purity CAFFEINE in HPLC grade water: Caffeine has two useful lambda maximums that we can use for wavelength accuracy checks in the ultraviolet region, 205 nm and 273 nm. We often prepare a range of solutions from 5 ug / mL to 500 ug / mL for linearity testing of UV/VIS detectors, but any of those same solutions could be used for wavelength accuracy checking (similar method as described above for anthracene).

• One of the most widely used methods requires a solution of HOLMIUM PERCHLORATE  solution (NIST). Available for purchase from many chemical suppliers, this acidic solution provides excellent signals for calibration at well documented transmittance bands (i.e. 241.1, 287.1, 361.5 nm and many others out to ~ 640 nm, depending on the solution it is dissolved in). The detector's flow cell can be filled with the solution and measurements made. The solution is also available coated onto quartz slides and is in fact what is found and used in many detectors today as part of their built-in verification. However, you can still prepare your own test solution.

Notes: A reminder that the solution used to prepare the wavelength check standard(s) in will directly affect the results obtained. If you prepare it in a solution which has strong absorbance at or near the region you test, the results obtained may be inaccurate (e.g. a test std dissolved in MeOH used to measure wavelength accuracy at 205 nm would not be an appropriate choice. A standard dissolved in ethyl acetate would obscure the UV wavelengths below its cutoff of ~ 256 nm). Make sure your SOPs state exactly which solutions are used, how they are prepared and which flow cell are used to make the measurements! Flow cells with different dimensions (i.e. path lengths, volumes) will result in different signal outputs. Different background solutions will also result in different results which can not be directly compared (invalid test). For each test, you must use scientifically appropriate methods and the same conditions to make all measurements.

HPLC Solvents, Acetonitrile and Methanol, Key Differences and Properties

Widely used in RP HPLC method development, Acetonitrile (ACN) and Methanol (MeOH) are the two most common solvents you will use with water or aqueous buffers to develop methods. So, besides the fact that Acetonitrile is well know to have a higher elution strength / capacity than Methanol [*but NOT at high organic concentrations (e.g. 95% Methanol vs 95% ACN) where Methanol has a higher elution strength than Acetonitrile does], what other properties should chromatographer's be aware of? Let's discuss a few that all chromatographers should know.

PREPARATIONS of MIXTURES (A/B):
First, a few comments about the preparation of mobile phase solutions. 

• Only the purely aqueous portion can be correctly adjusted for pH. Do not try and measure or adjust the pH of the organic or organic solution mixture. 

     There are two common methods of preparing binary mixtures (V/V) of mobile phase solutions.

• Method #1 is to fill a volumetric flask with a specific volume of the "A" solution, then fill the flask up to the line with the "B" solution.

• Method #2 is to fill a graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of "A" solution; fill a second graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of the "B" solution and then mix the contents of both together.

Whichever method you use, please fully document it in your HPLC method so anyone reading it will be able to accurately reproduce it. The two methods described above are both correct in design, but will result in solutions with different properties.

ABSORBANCE of UV LIGHT:
For HPLC grade solvent (*we should always use HPLC or LC-MS grade solutions in HPLC analysis), ACN has the lowest absorbance (~ 190 nm) of the two making it well suited for low UV applications. HPLC grade MeOH has a slightly higher UV cut-off, around 205-210 nm, limiting its use in the very low UV ranges. *Methods which require low UV wavelengths (<230 nm) should not use Methanol as the primary solvent.

SOLVENT SOLUBILITY:
There is a significant difference between ACN and MeOH in their ability to dissolve many types of buffer salts AND samples. These differences may be critical during method development as higher salt concentrations could lead to plugs, clogs or precipation. 

Solubility of the Mobile Phase:

• A common reason for gradient runs to show poor reproducibility or to fail may be associated with running high concentrations of buffer combined with high concentrations of organic solvent. Most aqueous / organic solutions containing salt solutions of less than 10 mM concentration are not likely to precipitate under most gradient conditions (running to a max of 95% organic, not 100%). If high percentages of organic solvent are mixed with more concentrated buffer solutions, then the higher salt concentrations may precipitate out of solution during the analysis (resulting in clogs, leaks, plugs and/or inaccurate results). Be cautious when mixing organic solvents and buffers together for gradient analysis. Make sure the solutions used will stay in solution and be stable at all concentrations used. Also verify that the buffering capacity is still present when high organic concentrations are used (as your buffer will be diluted). *Not sure if the salt will stay in solution? Just mix up a sample at the same concentration for a test. Look at it. Is there any turbidity or particulate visible? You should have your answer.

• Methanol's overall better solubility characteristics (better than ACN) mean that it often does a better job of dissolving most salts (esp NH4, K and Na) at higher concentrations resulting in better performance and less precipitation.

Solubility of the Samples (changes to Peak Shape, Selectivity & Retention):

• A fundamental requirement of liquid chromatography is that the sample fully dissolves in the mobile phase (initial mobile phase). Dissolve the sample in the mobile phase or in a slightly weaker strength solution (not a stronger solution) before analysis. This insures it will be loaded onto the head of the column as a concentrated slug improving peak shape and RSD. If the sample does not fully dissolve in the mobile phase then you are not in fact analyzing the whole sample. Another area where Methanol may be superior to ACN can be found in its ability to fully dissolve more types of samples. This improved solubility may result in better overall peak shape. Methanol also has different selectivity, often better than ACN (not just the elution strength) which may result in peaks eluting at different retention times than expecting. This is another reason why we always try different mobile phase mixtures containing either ACN or MeOH when developing RP methods. Please never assume that one solvent will be better than the other. Too many novice chromatographer's use only ACN as their main organic solvent for method development. Please don't make their mistake as such a strategy indicates a lack of practical experience and knowledge. You must first try them both separately (ACN & MeOH) to evaluate the results with your own sample (best to start with comprehensive gradients at different pH values, as applicable). You will be rewarded for putting in the initial time to test both types of solutions as no simulator has yet been developed which can predict a truly accurate result with your own sample(s). You may be surprised to learn how many samples show better peak shape and performance using MeOH solutions. If no improvement is seen, document it and move forward with more confidence.

BACKPRESSURE & OUTGASSING:

• ACN is less viscous than MeOH ( 0.34 vs. 0.54 viscosity, respectively) and if used alone will result in lower column and system back-pressures overall. Less gas will dissolve into ACN vs MeOH. Mixtures of ACN and Water will also exhibit an endothermic reaction (cooling the solution) which can trap gas inside the solution. If you pre-mix your mobile phase, let it rest for several minutes after preparation.Mixtures of ACN and Water will show a pressure max around 70% ACN (*This is an unusual characteristic well worth learning).
  

• MeOH is more viscous than ACN alone. It also has an unusual property where a 50/50 mixture of MeOH and Water will result in a much higher system and column back pressure than either MeOH or Water alone will (*ACN has a similar property, but the peak pressure occurs between 60-70%). The effect with methanol is very Gaussian with a peak pressure observed with a 50/50 mixture. An exothermic reaction results from an initial mixture of the two solutions (MeOH and Water) releasing some gas. When preparing solutions it is best to allow the solution to rest for a few minutes to out-gas before topping off or using in the HPLC system.

I hope that this short discussion about some of the differences between these two popular HPLC solvents will aid you in developing better quality HPLC and LC-MS methods.

Reference: Table of HPLC Solvent Properties

PEAK PURITY Determination by HPLC Diode Array Chromatography Software (UV/VIS): Limitations and Uses

"Peak Purity" software determination by HPLC UV/VIS detection is one of the most abused and easily misunderstood features found in advanced liquid chromatography systems (e.g. HPLC, UHPLC and CE).

For HPLC, one or more inline detectors can be used which provide additional data about a fully resolved peak’s physical or chemical properties. The data obtained can be compared to that of a pure standard, or known impurity. For compounds which absorb light in the region of most UV/VIS detectors (~ 200 to 900 nm), a single wavelength detector (e.g. UV/VIS) provides a very limited second dimension of data (retention time is the first dimension), but a scanning, multi-wavelength UV/VIS detector can add a second and third dimension of data to the retention time. Scanning detectors, commonly known as Diode-Array Detectors (aka: DAD or PDA) are commonly used in HPLC and CE analysis (they are required for routine method development). A scanning DAD can provide detailed sample UV/VIS spectra across a range of wavelengths for each peak, at any retention time recorded, allowing for a 3D plot of the spectra to be recorded much like a “fingerprint”. "Pure" compounds which do absorb light across a pre-defined wavelength range should show identical spectral profiles (“slices”) across the upslope, apex and down slope of the resolved peak. "Impure" peaks may show dissimilar spectra across the width of the peak revealing the presence of a co-eluting peak or impurity. Impure peaks may also NOT show any dissimilar spectra at all (because some compounds may not be detected). When a properly developed HPLC analysis method is used to evaluate the purity of a sample, the single dimension of “retention time” is evaluated with additional dimensions of analysis such as the UV/VIS peak spectra. "Peak Purity" relies on the detection of a sample's spectral profile to detect the presence of an "impurity" (that may have co-eluted with the sample). This additional dimension of analysis (full Spectra) is required to improve the confidence level that a peak may in fact be correctly identified (qualitatively) and does not contain any co-eluting compounds. IOW: "Peak Purity" does not actually test for purity.

Diode-Array 'Software' based Peak purity determination by HPLC is a qualitative assessment of the impurity profile of the sample. It is designed to reveal impurities, NOT prove peak purity. BTW: We really should rename it “Peak Spectral Impurity Assessment" because that is in fact what we are measuring. The algorithm used for Peak Purity determination is designed to confirm the presence of one or more impurities by comparing spectral data slices (multiple slices taken at the apex and both the upslope and down slope sections of the peak).  A mismatch would indicate the peak has not been fully resolved (one or more co-eluting peaks are present). In other words, it is impure by UV/VIS analysis. Note: It does not indicate that the compound is impure, but rather 'the peak' being measured is. As you can see, the concept makes sense, but the how it is used in many laboratories is flawed leading to invalid reports and data.

• “Peak Purity” does not in fact indicate the actual purity of the compound, but instead indicates when a peak may be found to contain impurities. It is an estimated measure of PEAK Impurity.

In simple terms, IF the spectral slices obtained from one peak are not identical, than the peak may contain one or more impurities. Co-elution is the most likely reason for this.

Points to consider when using "Peak Purity" software:

• The absence of any spectral differences across the sample peak are not an indication of actual purity;
• Compounds similar to your sample may have similar absorbance profiles (fooling the system);
• The relative concentration of actual impurities may not be high enough to detect;
• The compounds / impurities may not absorb light at the wavelengths scanned;
• The HPLC method used, the software settings and the parameters that you chose in the ‘Peak Purity’ software menu have a huge effect on the results obtained. Different people often get different results for the same sample. Inputting poor quality settings or using a poor quality method often leads to misleading purity results. This is an advanced software feature requiring many years of training to use. Again, it does NOT test for purity.
  
• The peak of interest must be retained on the column (K prime > 2) and resolved apart from any observed peaks. Don't use peak purity to analyze peak(s) which elute at or near the column void volume (Low K prime values may demonstrate that good chromatography fundamentals were ignored. Poor quality methods fail validation). Poor quality HPLC method and poorly selected DAD "Purity" settings result in invalid results (audits, recalls etc may result from reliance on a subjective "software" feature).

We prefer to think of HPLC 'Peak Purity Assessment' as a null test. If the recorded peak spectral data slices are different, than you probably have co-elution and/or impurities present (so try and develop a better method to resolve the peaks apart). If no differences in the spectra are seen (they are similar), then the peak may be pure or may contain compounds with similar spectra as are commonly seen with related reaction synthesis products or compounds. So only when you detect differences in the acquired spectra can you be confident that there IS a qualitative difference or impurity present. You will not know what percentage of impurity level is (since you do not know what it is).

When configuring the Peak Purity parameters for your sample, you must start with a very high quality HPLC method (A "validated method" is not necessarily a high quality method. "Validation" does not in fact insure that the method follows good chromatography fundamantals). The correct detector sample rate, threshold, slope, signal wavelength and bandwidths need to have been properly selected and used (Reference Wavelength always OFF). The peaks shown in your chromatogram should have excellent symmetry with good on-column retention (K-prime, as applicable to mode), baseline separation (> 2.0 for non-SEC modes) and very low baseline noise levels. The two Peak Purity spectral reference points should be manually selected and placed at times before and after the peak of interest in clear baseline areas where no other peaks or spectra are seen (never use the instrument default settings for reference points!). Select at least 7 spectra from the sample peak for comparison (more detail can be provided with more spectra, but be careful not to select spectra near the baseline or the noise limits). If your method and chromatogram are not of the highest quality, then please do not use the automated "peak purity" analysis feature, instead spend time improving your method.

SUMMARY: 

The HPLC UV/VIS Peak Purity Analysis (“Peak Spectral Purity”) feature is very complex and has many software settings which must be set up correctly to obtain any scientifically useful data regarding possible peak impurity levels. 

• Do NOT use the system default settings / values for 'Peak Purity' ! They are just place holders for actual values (which you must calculate and fill in the correct values for your method).
  

 

* Due to a general lack of formal training, I often see this software feature being used incorrectly by most chromatographers. This is worth repeating... the HPLC method used to obtain the original data must be of the highest quality and the training of the operator must also be at the highest level. To use this advanced software feature successfully, an advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography are required as are a detailed understanding of all of the peak purity software features (how to set the correct threshold, obtain reference baselines, Set sampling rate, noise levels, signal extraction, normalization settings…). Routine HPLC training classes do not cover these types of tasks. Years of specialized training and practical experience are required to use these tools. Never use the “automated” versions or the manufacturer’s default values to find “Peak Purity”. The only correct way to use these features is to manually tune the method and settings to your specific sample. Failure to customize the method and settings used may result in invalid data and incorrect "purity" determinations. 

Due to very complex software setup needed for "Peak Purity" determination by UV/VIS spectra, the requirement for a high quality HPLC method and a high quality data-set,it is our opinion that few should ever use it. In general, the recommendation for most chromatographers is to not use this feature unless first having demonstrated the required skills and advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography. Most of the methods that we professionally review where "Peak Purity" data have been used as part of the method have been found to be based on invalid methods, resulting in any "purity statements" issued as unscientific and invalid. Please proceed cautiously and request professional review of any methods which employ it BEFORE committing to relying on it.

©Copyright, March 1, 1996 by William Letter of Chiralizer Services (Plainsboro, NJ) from a portion of material presented in an HPLC Diode Array Method Development Class.

HPLC Detector Optical SLIT WIDTH Selection

A few notes on HPLC Optical Slit Width selection:

   Notes: 

1. The chosen slit width setting determines the amount of light which is directed to the detector.
2. For most HPLC methods, a slit width value of 4 nm is suggested. 
3. Bandwidth should be set at least as wide as the optical slit width.

Characteristics of Narrow Optical Slit Widths:

• Less light falls on the detector
• Less signal intensity
• Increased baseline noise
• S/N ratio decreases
• Spectral resolution improves which allows for more accurate spectral identification.

Characteristics of Wide Optical Slit Widths:

• More light falls on the detector
• Greater signal intensity
• Decreased baseline noise 
• S/N ratio improves
• Spectral resolution decreases and detail is lost. Less accurate spectral identification and an increase in errors for spectral library matching.

Chromophore, Chromophores, UV Absorbing for HPLC Analysis and Detection

A compound's absorption coefficient relates to its "strength". I find it useful to know which compounds can (and cannot) be easily detected by UV/VIS and a quick analysis of their chemical groups can provide an answer. Please note that the actual measured absorbance maximums will vary depending on the solution that the compound is dissolved in. Beta-Carotene is included as a very interesting structural example because it is composed of long chains of conjugated double bonds (isoprene units) which are cyclised at each end. Here are some other popular examples:

KEY CHROMOPHORE        Absorption MAX (nm)  STRENGTH

acetylide                                    177                           medium
aldehyde (2)                                210                           strong
anthracene                                 252 & 375                strong
azido                                          190                           medium
amine                                         195                           weak
benzene                                     184 & 255                strong
β-carotene                                  450                          medium
disulfide                                      194                          medium
ether                                           185                           weak
ethylene                                     190                           medium
ketone (2)                                   190                           weak
naphthalane                              220 & 286                strong
nitrate                                        270                           weak-strong
nitrite                                         225                           weak
nitro                                           210                           strong
oxime                                         190                           medium
thiol                                            195                           weak
thioketone                                  205                           strong
thioether                                     194                           medium
conjugated ring                        varies                          strong

Notes: 

1. Chromophore conjugation is the process that gives rise to multiple spectral peaks (or shoulders) which are very useful in qualitative identification for HPLC (Spectral fingerprinting). For more information on this topic, I recommend a very well written description of UV/VIS spectroscopy fundamentals at this link.
2. Other interesting examples: Carbonyl (aldehyde) as found in Acetaldehyde; 293nm. Carbonyl (ketone) such as found in Acetone; 271nm.

Data supplied from "Instrumental Methods of Analysis"; Willard, Merritt & Dean; D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc., (1965).

What type of Water Should I use for HPLC, UHPLC or LC/MS Analysis?

Water is one of the most common solvents used in reversed phase chromatography. HPLC and LC/MS work demands ultra pure quality water be used in all applications which call for it as part of the method. Special types of HPLC analysis, such as amino acid analysis and ion chromatography, demand fresh ultra high quality water be used or artifact peaks may result. Poor quality or low grades of water may lead to "ghost peaks", baseline instability, high background noise or signals, contamination of columns and an inability to obtain reproducible results. Use the freshest and highest purity of water for best results.

A good starting point for describing the type of water suited to liquid chromatography applications is to look at the specification for ASTM Type 1 Reagent grade water. We often exceed this requirement for chromatography applications as several unspecified items such as nitrates and other chemicals present may have a negative effect on our analysis methods.

How does the grade of water affect our chromatography? The grade specified often dictates the amount of organics, bacteria, particulate, residues and overall absorbance the water will have. For example.

(1) Organics: High levels of T.O.C. can accumulate on the particles, inside the pores, or bind to active sites on the support inside the column causing a loss of resolution or sensitivity. *Lower T.O.C. levels are desirable.

(2) Bacteria: Microorganisms can contaminate the buffer solutions used causing ghost peaks, column fouling and the release of additional foreign organic matter into the system. This can result in clogs, ghost peaks, poor reproducibility or loss of resolution and/or sensitivity. *The water should be filtered through a 0.2 micron filter before use. Refrigerate solutions for no more than 3 days to slow growth, then dispose of the solutions.

(3) UV absorbance: High background or interfering ions which absorb can raise the baseline and noise levels seen, decreasing the total dynamic range. *Again, the lowest values, esp. at 200nm, are desirable.

A few of the general requirements for HPLC grade ultrapure Type 1 water can be stated as follows:

   Resistivity :         > 18 MΩ•cm at 25.0 C
   T.O.C. :              < 5 ppb
   UV cutoff :          190nm (as low in absorbance as possible!)
   Filtered :             0.2 micron Filter

*Some suppliers will also specify residue after evaporation (usually < 2 ppm); Trace metal analysis; Optical properties at specified wavelengths and other information. If purchasing by the bottle, request a copy of the lot certification sheet for the water so you can compare the measured values to other products.

Generating your own in-house, reverse osmosis (RO) ultra pure water from potable tap water is one of the best ways to insure you have high quality water for your LC methods. These systems pre-filter the water to remove large particulates then typically use UV lamps and/or multiple resin cartridges to remove the maximum amount of T.O.C.'s from the water plus many trace metals before finally filtering the water through a 0.2 micron membrane as a final polishing step. Various types of systems can be purchased, but for HPLC or LC-MS applications, it is critical that you select a system that provides ultra pure water suitable for your applications. Periodic maintenance of the filter cartridges and monitoring of the main water supply source is critical to their operation (some "tap" water sources may require pre-treatement). *"Water On Demand" systems such as these provide fresh clean water on demand so there is no need to be concerned with storage issues. A number of different vendors offer these lab grade systems for HPLC and LC/MS applications and you can contact them (e.g. Millipore/Sigma Milli-Q® brand) to determine which system will provide you with the volume and quality of water which is appropriate for your application(s).

If you do not have access to an in-house reverse osmosis system, then purchasing HPLC or LC/MS grade water in glass bottles may be another option. A hint, before opening and using them,  clean the outside of bottles of all dust. Date the bottles when you first open them. Bacteria will start to grow once the bottle has been opened. The glass will also slowly leach ions (i.e. Sodium) over time into the water so it is best to use the water quickly.

Never underestimate how the quality of the water you use to perform chromatography can change the results seen in your methods. Water quality is just as critical as any other component in your system so be sure and take the time to monitor it just like you do to any other part of the system.

Method Development Hint: Use your HPLC Diode Array Detector (DAD or PDA) as a Spectrophotometer

One of the many useful features of a UV/VIS scanning diode array detector is that it can be employed in flow injection mode to scan a sample and provide you with some useful data about the absorbance characteristics of the sample (which probably contains a mixture of components). Unlike a spectrophotometer, you only need about 1 ul of sample instead of a 1ml cuvette and only 15-20 seconds of time to gather the data.

Why do this? I use this feature often when I receive a new and unfamiliar sample for method development. I set up the detector to scan and store all wavelengths, in steps of 2nm, from 210nm to 450nm and inject the sample in flow injection mode (that means no-column is present and I easily do this using the By-Pass position on my column selector). In a very short amount of time I can view the resulting spectra of the sample which aids me in selecting the initial discreet wavelengths to monitor. For example: If I notice that the sample shows some absorbance at 410nm using the flow injection run, then notice while developing the analysis method that none of the peaks seen show absorbance near 410nm, then I can assume that I may still have some components retained on the column.

Setup Hints:
(1) For this to work well, you should have a high performance, low volume switching valve or automated column selection system (e.g. The LC Spiderling Column Selection System) installed so you can easily by-pass your column (otherwise, remove your column and place a high pressure, low volume union in its place).
(2) Set the diode array detector to a high sampling rate because the sample is going to fly through the flow cell quickly. Use a sampling rate that is faster than you would use if a column was there to disperse the sample and slow down the peaks.
(3) Choose a wide range of wavelengths to scan and store. If the sample appears colorless to the eye in solution and I am running in a UV transparent solvent such as acetonitrile, then I often use a range of 210 to 450nm.

HPLC Solvent Properties Table (e.g. Polarity, Density, Boiling Point...)

Here is a link to a table listing common chromatography solvents and their physical properties (e.g. viscosity, polarity, UV absorption...). 

http://www.hplctools.com/lcsolvent.htm

UV / VIS, VWD, DAD, PDA HPLC DETECTOR SIGNAL BANDWIDTH (bw) SELECTION

Modern chromatography UV/VIS detectors offer the operator a choice of one to several hundred different signal wavelength choices (as is the case for Diode Array Detectors). Besides being able to specify a single wavelength, you can often choose a signal BANDWIDTH (bw) to associate with each wavelength [e.g. for a 280 nm signal with 10 nm bandwidth. This is often written as: 280 (10) or [280:10]. In many detectors, Signal Bandwidth is a variable, not fixed and represents the total number of nanometers across the specified signal value chosen. For example: If you select a signal wavelength of 280 nm and choose a bandwidth value of 10 nm, then you are actually gathering all signal data between 275 nm and 285 nm (5 nm to the left of the apex and 5 nm to the right for a total of 10 nm). Using a narrow bandwidth has the advantage of increasing the signal selectivity of the detector as you are only collecting data within a tight window. If you were to increase the bandwidth to 60 nm in the same example you would now be collecting data between 250 nm and 310 nm. The additional data collected over this wider range may reduce the total noise (by averaging it over a wide range), improve the S/N ratio (which may increase sensitivity), but it also reduces the selectivity. Large bandwidths also increase the chance you may include peak signal data from other co-eluting components into your signal data. You must select a bandwidth range for each signal wavelength which is located 'safely' away from any other potentially interfering peak. As with many things in life, balance is important. In this case, bandwidth choice is the balance between selectivity and sensitivity.

• When developing new methods we recommend that you choose an initial bandwidth value of 10 nm for each signal. This provides a nice balance between selectivity and sensitivity. It is also a common bandwidth value used on many older UV/VIS detectors which have a fixed signal bandwidth (such as many single or variable wavelength detectors).

• If you have determined the exact signal maximum for your sample and you would like to gain additional sensitivity for your sample (and thus decrease selectivity), re-run the analysis using several different, but increasing signal bandwidth values (e.g. 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 nm). Choose bw values that are safely within the range of the detector, within the limits of the mobile phase's absorption region and also away from any potential co-eluting peaks. *To confirm which value is best, be sure and calculate the actual measured signal to noise ratio of the peak of interest after each analysis. This is a critical step! Do not be fooled by increases in the peak height or area alone as these changes are not always synonymous with better signal to noise ratios. Only by measuring the actual baseline noise level for each run and comparing it with the actual peak signal obtained will you be able to determine if increasing the bandwidth has provided you with better noise reduction and signal strength.

• To increase spectral signal selectivity choose a bw value that is very narrow. A value such as 2 or 4 nm would allow the detector to collect only signal data that is at or near the apex of your selected wavelength. This can be very useful when trying to discriminate your signal from nearby signal peaks, especially at low wavelengths such as 210 nm.

• When reporting your method conditions always include the wavelength AND bandwidth used for each signal. In order to accurately reproduce your method, this information is needed. *The flow cell dimensions, wavelength and bandwidth should always be included in your method.

REFERENCE WAVELENGTHS (as used in HPLC UV/VIS):

One of the most common problems that I see as a consultant in laboratories which use chromatography for sample analysis relates to how to choose appropriate settings for the modern UV/VIS detectors. In addition to selecting scientifically appropriate UV/VIS wavelength(s) and Bandwidth signal values, selecting one optional feature may invalidate an entire HPLC method. This software feature, found in many Multi-Wavelength and Scanning Diode Array UV/VIS detectors (aka: "DAD" or a "PDA") is known as the “ReferenceWavelength” .

• Please do not confuse this specific software feature ("Reference Wavelength") with the initial reference scan ('zero') which the detector takes at the start of the analysis and is subtracted from your desired signal to show only one initial signal plot (and which is used as the initial signal value to compare to the measured signal during the rest of the analysis run. This is usually known as "zeroing" the detector and occurs just once, at the start of each run. When you manually press the 'Auto-zero', you are adjusting the displayed signal plot to a know reference point (often 0.0 volts). This is a one-time zero of the signal and has nothing to do with the special software feature we discuss in this article.

"Reference Wavelength" [Usually written as: Signal Wavelength/Bandwidth: Ref Wavelength/Bandwidth]. Most manufacturers of advanced HPLC UV/VIS (esp. DAD/PDA) detectors provide this extra software feature in their chromatography software, but its use and function are a mystery to most chromatographers. As with all advanced features, proper training is required to understand and use them successfully. Using advanced features without proper training can result in analysis errors, invalid methods and perhaps very expensive product recalls.

Allow me to provide a brief explanation of the “Reference Wavelength” software feature as seen and used with many DAD and/or PDA detectors (e.g. HP/Agilent and Waters brand HPLC systems).

If you are running a gradient analysis, then the change in solvent properties (RI and light absorption/transmission) and temperature over time can cause noticeable baseline drift during the run. This drift up or down relative to the starting baseline reference point is normal, but may cause a number of quantification problems with the analysis reporting software (as flat baselines are more easily and accurately integrated than sloped ones). 

Two scientifically correct methods were developed to deal with this slippery slope of a problem. Each proposed method has some limitations, but if optimized can improve the quality of the resulting baseline (flatter, allowing for better peak integration) and preserve the original acquired signal data for compliance.

(Method # 1) Run the same method again, but this time with no sample (a blank of mobile phase) and subtract the resulting signal to produce a "blank subtracted run". This preserves the original data and removes the observed drift from the resulting signal ('A' - 'B'  = 'C'), but due to the time difference between injections, you are unable to confirm if anything has changed between the time of the first and second injection. It is not perfect.

(Method # 2) Set up the detector to collect a second channel of data (2nd wavelength signal) that is close to the original wavelength selection, BUT far enough away from the original signal such that it will not overlap any of the peak spectra of interest or other compounds in the sample. This is tricky as you want it close enough to show the drift, but far enough away to not show any sample signal. If selected carefully, it can be used as a pseudo blank run for post-run baseline subtraction. You can then subtract the second acquired ‘blank’ signal run from your original signal run and the resulting chromatogram should have a flatter baseline (less drift) for quantification purposes. With this method, two separate signals, 'A' and 'B', are collected at the same time (this is the key). A third, baseline subtracted signal, 'C', can be generated from them. This method preserves the raw data obtained from all three signals (i.e. Original, Secondary, and Subtracted signals). The benefit of this method is that the signals are all acquired using the same time base (unlike Method #1).

Using the concept of Method # 2 described above, many HPLC manufactures added a software feature known as a the ‘Reference Wavelength’ to their systems. This feature allowed a chromatographer to include with each signal choice, 'A', a second wavelength value, 'B', (and bandwidth) as part of the method which would be used to subtract out raw data from the primary wavelength during the analysis. This subtraction occurs in real-time, on your raw data gathered from the detector and the resulting data reported to the user is in fact the result of the subtraction only. The original signal data is destroyed. You will never know what the original data looked like before the reference wavelength was subtracted from it (it has been destroyed). Only the newly manipulated (subtracted) result is provided, 'C'. If any sample peak(s) or impurities appeared in the region where you selected a reference wavelength/bandwidth, then the resulting data would have been subtracted from your actual sample and you would never know it happened or have any record of it! This brings up a serious validation issue as you are modifying the original data with no way of knowing (or documenting) how you have changed it. It is for this reason alone that we teach chromatographers to always turn this feature 'OFF' by default. If they want to make use of the feature, then we suggest that they simultaneously collect data from a second, separate wavelength channel such that the two raw data streams are preserved for validation purposes (Method # 2). IOW: To acquire scientifically useful data, turn 'OFF' the Reference Wavelength software feature and record all of the signal data. The separate signals can be compared, subtracted or manipulated as needed for integration and reporting purposes, but the original signal sample data, 'A', is left unchanged and secure. This allows you to monitor for contamination, impurities, problems or changes during the run. It also allows others to verify your method for accuracy.

Observational Notes:  I am often called in to diagnose what the client's refer to as 'a strange problem' where the area of a known sample peak changes in an unexpected way. That "way" often includes going NEGATIVE, below the baseline. Or even increasing in area, mass or decreasing in mass.The column is clean, pumps work fine, retention times are stable and everything appears to be working fine. *This anomaly is due to the reference wavelength software feature being turned 'ON' and another compound (peak) absorbing in the user selected Reference bandwidth region. Its absorption contributes to the final signal. If the data collected (area) for the 'reference peak' is larger than the sample peak the resulting chromatogram will show a negative peak (this tends to be noticed by most users as it is illogical and indicates a serious problem!), whereas if the reference peak is smaller than the sample peak, the resulting area signal decreases, which may or may not be noticed (incorrectly interpreted as a lower concentration sample). You can see the obvious danger posed by this situation. Companies can be put in a situation where all of their past data is found to be invalid and product recalls may result from this finding. The cause is directly related to a lack of understanding and proper training in the use of the software and/or HPLC system.

 
How to Solve The Problem: The reason we see this feature cause so many problems in laboratories appears to be due to the fact that the Reference Wavelength software feature is being turned 'ON' by default in the software for most DAD/ PDA modules (The real default value for "Reference Wavelength" should always be: 'OFF', not on).  To make matters worse, the default values for the wavelength and bandwidths often supplied by the manufacturers are actually used by most chromatographers (what are the odds that the random values placed in the system are even relevant to your analysis? Why would you use them?). We suggest using a ‘canned’ method template in most laboratories which includes a new default value for this feature... 'OFF' for all analysis methods. Most importantly of all, please obtain formal training in the use of a specialty detector such as a diode-array detector before using one for sample analysis.

Notes

1. The bandwidth chosen for each wavelength is also very important and if chosen poorly, can result in adding noise to your signal, reducing it or even enhancing it. Please refer to this article for more info: http://hplctips.blogspot.com/2011/09/uv-vis-hplc-detector-signal-bandwidth.html 
2. If you are still running HPLC methods with the “Reference Wavelength” turned 'ON' while awaiting approval to turn it 'OFF', then you can ADD additional signals to your method with the same primary settings as before, but with “Reference Wavelength” now set to 'OFF'. Adding the same signal w/o the “Reference Wavelength” will provide you with the original signal data for future comparison to the "collected/modified" signal (allowing you to see if the data was changed). Make sure you configure these extra channels to be saved with the analysis.