HPLC Solvents, Acetonitrile and Methanol, Key Differences and Properties

Widely used in RP HPLC method development, Acetonitrile (ACN) and Methanol (MeOH) are the two most common solvents you will use with water or aqueous buffers to develop methods. So, besides the fact that Acetonitrile is well know to have a higher elution strength / capacity than Methanol [*but NOT at high organic concentrations (e.g. 95% Methanol vs 95% ACN) where Methanol has a higher elution strength than Acetonitrile does], what other properties should chromatographer's be aware of? Let's discuss a few that all chromatographers should know.

PREPARATIONS of MIXTURES (A/B):
First, a few comments about the preparation of mobile phase solutions. 

• Only the purely aqueous portion can be correctly adjusted for pH. Do not try and measure or adjust the pH of the organic or organic solution mixture. 

     There are two common methods of preparing binary mixtures (V/V) of mobile phase solutions.

• Method #1 is to fill a volumetric flask with a specific volume of the "A" solution, then fill the flask up to the line with the "B" solution.

• Method #2 is to fill a graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of "A" solution; fill a second graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of the "B" solution and then mix the contents of both together.

Whichever method you use, please fully document it in your HPLC method so anyone reading it will be able to accurately reproduce it. The two methods described above are both correct in design, but will result in solutions with different properties.

ABSORBANCE of UV LIGHT:
For HPLC grade solvent (*we should always use HPLC or LC-MS grade solutions in HPLC analysis), ACN has the lowest absorbance (~ 190 nm) of the two making it well suited for low UV applications. HPLC grade MeOH has a slightly higher UV cut-off, around 205-210 nm, limiting its use in the very low UV ranges. *Methods which require low UV wavelengths (<230 nm) should not use Methanol as the primary solvent.

SOLVENT SOLUBILITY:
There is a significant difference between ACN and MeOH in their ability to dissolve many types of buffer salts AND samples. These differences may be critical during method development as higher salt concentrations could lead to plugs, clogs or precipation. 

Solubility of the Mobile Phase:

• A common reason for gradient runs to show poor reproducibility or to fail may be associated with running high concentrations of buffer combined with high concentrations of organic solvent. Most aqueous / organic solutions containing salt solutions of less than 10 mM concentration are not likely to precipitate under most gradient conditions (running to a max of 95% organic, not 100%). If high percentages of organic solvent are mixed with more concentrated buffer solutions, then the higher salt concentrations may precipitate out of solution during the analysis (resulting in clogs, leaks, plugs and/or inaccurate results). Be cautious when mixing organic solvents and buffers together for gradient analysis. Make sure the solutions used will stay in solution and be stable at all concentrations used. Also verify that the buffering capacity is still present when high organic concentrations are used (as your buffer will be diluted). *Not sure if the salt will stay in solution? Just mix up a sample at the same concentration for a test. Look at it. Is there any turbidity or particulate visible? You should have your answer.

• Methanol's overall better solubility characteristics (better than ACN) mean that it often does a better job of dissolving most salts (esp NH4, K and Na) at higher concentrations resulting in better performance and less precipitation.

Solubility of the Samples (changes to Peak Shape, Selectivity & Retention):

• A fundamental requirement of liquid chromatography is that the sample fully dissolves in the mobile phase (initial mobile phase). Dissolve the sample in the mobile phase or in a slightly weaker strength solution (not a stronger solution) before analysis. This insures it will be loaded onto the head of the column as a concentrated slug improving peak shape and RSD. If the sample does not fully dissolve in the mobile phase then you are not in fact analyzing the whole sample. Another area where Methanol may be superior to ACN can be found in its ability to fully dissolve more types of samples. This improved solubility may result in better overall peak shape. Methanol also has different selectivity, often better than ACN (not just the elution strength) which may result in peaks eluting at different retention times than expecting. This is another reason why we always try different mobile phase mixtures containing either ACN or MeOH when developing RP methods. Please never assume that one solvent will be better than the other. Too many novice chromatographer's use only ACN as their main organic solvent for method development. Please don't make their mistake as such a strategy indicates a lack of practical experience and knowledge. You must first try them both separately (ACN & MeOH) to evaluate the results with your own sample (best to start with comprehensive gradients at different pH values, as applicable). You will be rewarded for putting in the initial time to test both types of solutions as no simulator has yet been developed which can predict a truly accurate result with your own sample(s). You may be surprised to learn how many samples show better peak shape and performance using MeOH solutions. If no improvement is seen, document it and move forward with more confidence.

BACKPRESSURE & OUTGASSING:

• ACN is less viscous than MeOH ( 0.34 vs. 0.54 viscosity, respectively) and if used alone will result in lower column and system back-pressures overall. Less gas will dissolve into ACN vs MeOH. Mixtures of ACN and Water will also exhibit an endothermic reaction (cooling the solution) which can trap gas inside the solution. If you pre-mix your mobile phase, let it rest for several minutes after preparation.Mixtures of ACN and Water will show a pressure max around 70% ACN (*This is an unusual characteristic well worth learning).
  

• MeOH is more viscous than ACN alone. It also has an unusual property where a 50/50 mixture of MeOH and Water will result in a much higher system and column back pressure than either MeOH or Water alone will (*ACN has a similar property, but the peak pressure occurs between 60-70%). The effect with methanol is very Gaussian with a peak pressure observed with a 50/50 mixture. An exothermic reaction results from an initial mixture of the two solutions (MeOH and Water) releasing some gas. When preparing solutions it is best to allow the solution to rest for a few minutes to out-gas before topping off or using in the HPLC system.

I hope that this short discussion about some of the differences between these two popular HPLC solvents will aid you in developing better quality HPLC and LC-MS methods.

Reference: Table of HPLC Solvent Properties

Column Temperature in HPLC / UHPLC / LC-MS

Let us not forget the role of temperature in liquid chromatography. Just as mobile phase composition changes are used to develop better methods, column temperature is an important chromatography variable which must be addressed. I would like to call to your attention to a few different ways temperature can change your chromatography in this "hint and tip".

(1) Stability & Reproducibility of the Method: 
Maintaining a stable column temperature during a separation is important. Excellent temperature stability can lead to a high degree of reproducibility (*Their are of course many other factors to consider as well). For a typical analysis, temperature stability of 1.0 °C / hour (over the course of the analysis) is usually enough. If you are not using a thermostatted column compartment to perform your chromatography you may have already noticed the hour-to-hour or day-to-day fluctuations which can result from running samples under ambient temperature conditions. The normal changes in room temperature can be several degrees C over an eight hour period. These types of temperatures changes can make it impossible to achieve reproducible results for some samples. It is for this reason that it is critical that you include some type of temperature control as part of your method. Always record the temperature at the start and end of each run and include this data with your report. Most of the automated chromatography data systems provide this data as standard today and it is very valuable in reproducing the data as well as for troubleshooting, if needed.

(2) Back Pressure:
Column back pressure is directly changed by temperature. As the temperature rises, the column back pressure decreases. As the temperature decreases, the back pressure increases. This can be a useful variable when working with some of the newest sub-two micron particles on the market. The very high back pressures produced by these particles can be significantly reduced by increasing the column temperature [See "Pressure Drop Across an HPLC Column" http://www.hplctools.com/Tip%20114%20Pressure%20Drop%20Across%20an%20HPLC%20Column.htm]. 

When practical, try experimenting with your method by increasing the temperature, in increments of 5°C, to measure the change. You may discover an improved method with lower back pressures, a shorter run time and sharper peaks.

(3) Viscosity: 
Viscous mobile phase systems can take advantage of using higher temperatures to reduce the overall system back pressure. Since efficiency often improves with higher temperatures a double bonus of higher efficiency (sharper peaks) and lower back pressure can be achieved just by increasing the column temperature (peaks sometimes change elution order too so use standards to check this). 

(4) Practical Considerations:
Their are limits to using higher temperatures in chromatography which must be respected. The stability and solubility of your sample, the boiling point of your solvent, the maximum temperature setting of your column heater (mobile phase, flow cell and the rest of the HPLC system) and the stability of your column over time will determine how far you can safely push this.

(5) Specifications: 
One other issue worth mentioning here is that many traditional silica columns can loose their bonded phase at temperatures above 60°C. Some specialty silica phases (i.e. Waters XBridge & Zorbax StableBond) have temperature ratings to ~ 90°C. The more exotic non-silica based supports (e.g. Zirconium, graphitized carbon and/or PSDVB) often provide poor efficiency compared to the silica based products, but can handle temperatures in excess of 100°C. 

*Always consult with the column and/or instrument manufacturer to determine what the correct and safe operating conditions are before using any instrument, column or chemical.

HPLC Solvent Properties Table (e.g. Polarity, Density, Boiling Point...)

Here is a link to a table listing common chromatography solvents and their physical properties (e.g. viscosity, polarity, UV absorption...). 

http://www.hplctools.com/lcsolvent.htm