Translator for HPLC HINTS and TIPS for Chromatographers

Saturday, September 2, 2017

HPLC Solvents, Acetonitrile and Methanol, Key Differences and Properties

Widely used in RP HPLC method development, Acetonitrile (ACN) and Methanol (MeOH) are the two most common solvents you will use with water or aqueous buffers to develop methods. So, besides the fact that Acetonitrile is well know to have a higher elution strength / capacity than Methanol [*but NOT at high organic concentrations (e.g. 95% Methanol vs 95% ACN) where Methanol has a higher elution strength than Acetonitrile does], what other properties should chromatographer's be aware of? Let's discuss a few that all chromatographers should know.

PREPARATIONS of MIXTURES (A/B):
First, a few comments about the preparation of mobile phase solutions. 


     There are two common methods of preparing binary mixtures (V/V) of mobile phase solutions.
  • Method #1 is to fill a volumetric flask with a specific volume of the "A" solution, then fill the flask up to the line with the "B" solution.
  • Method #2 is to fill a graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of "A" solution; fill a second graduated cylinder (or volumetric flask) with a specified amount of the "B" solution and then mix the contents of both together.
Whichever method you use, please fully document it in your HPLC method so anyone reading it will be able to accurately reproduce it. The two methods described above are both correct in design, but will result in solutions with different properties.

ABSORBANCE of UV LIGHT:
For HPLC grade solvent (*we should always use HPLC or LC-MS grade solutions in HPLC analysis), ACN has the lowest absorbance (~ 190 nm) of the two making it well suited for low UV applications. HPLC grade MeOH has a slightly higher UV cut-off, around 205-210 nm, limiting its use in the very low UV ranges. *Methods which require low UV wavelengths (<230 nm) should not use Methanol as the primary solvent.

SOLVENT SOLUBILITY:
There is a significant difference between ACN and MeOH in their ability to dissolve many types of buffer salts AND samples. These differences may be critical during method development as higher salt concentrations could lead to plugs, clogs or precipation. 

Solubility of the Mobile Phase:
  • A common reason for gradient runs to show poor reproducibility or to fail may be associated with running high concentrations of buffer combined with high concentrations of organic solvent. Most aqueous / organic solutions containing salt solutions of less than 10 mM concentration are not likely to precipitate under most gradient conditions (running to a max of 95% organic, not 100%). If high percentages of organic solvent are mixed with more concentrated buffer solutions, then the higher salt concentrations may precipitate out of solution during the analysis (resulting in clogs, leaks, plugs and/or inaccurate results). Be cautious when mixing organic solvents and buffers together for gradient analysis. Make sure the solutions used will stay in solution and be stable at all concentrations used. Also verify that the buffering capacity is still present when high organic concentrations are used (as your buffer will be diluted). *Not sure if the salt will stay in solution? Just mix up a sample at the same concentration for a test. Look at it. Is there any turbidity or particulate visible? You should have your answer.

  • Methanol's overall better solubility characteristics (better than ACN) mean that it often does a better job of dissolving most salts (esp NH4, K and Na) at higher concentrations resulting in better performance and less precipitation.

Solubility of the Samples (changes to Peak Shape, Selectivity & Retention):
  • A fundamental requirement of liquid chromatography is that the sample fully dissolves in the mobile phase (initial mobile phase). Dissolve the sample in the mobile phase or in a slightly weaker strength solution (not a stronger solution) before analysis. This insures it will be loaded onto the head of the column as a concentrated slug improving peak shape and RSD. If the sample does not fully dissolve in the mobile phase then you are not in fact analyzing the whole sample. Another area where Methanol may be superior to ACN can be found in its ability to fully dissolve more types of samples. This improved solubility may result in better overall peak shape. Methanol also has different selectivity, often better than ACN (not just the elution strength) which may result in peaks eluting at different retention times than expecting. This is another reason why we always try different mobile phase mixtures containing either ACN or MeOH when developing RP methods. Please never assume that one solvent will be better than the other. Too many novice chromatographer's use only ACN as their main organic solvent for method development. Please don't make their mistake as such a strategy indicates a lack of practical experience and knowledge. You must first try them both separately (ACN & MeOH) to evaluate the results with your own sample (best to start with comprehensive gradients at different pH values, as applicable). You will be rewarded for putting in the initial time to test both types of solutions as no simulator has yet been developed which can predict a truly accurate result with your own sample(s). You may be surprised to learn how many samples show better peak shape and performance using MeOH solutions. If no improvement is seen, document it and move forward with more confidence.

BACKPRESSURE & OUTGASSING:
  • ACN is less viscous than MeOH ( 0.34 vs. 0.54 viscosity, respectively) and if used alone will result in lower column and system back-pressures overall. Less gas will dissolve into ACN vs MeOH. Mixtures of ACN and Water will also exhibit an endothermic reaction (cooling the solution) which can trap gas inside the solution. If you pre-mix your mobile phase, let it rest for several minutes after preparation.Mixtures of ACN and Water will show a pressure max around 70% ACN (*This is an unusual characteristic well worth learning).
  • MeOH is more viscous than ACN alone. It also has an unusual property where a 50/50 mixture of MeOH and Water will result in a much higher system and column back pressure than either MeOH or Water alone will (*ACN has a similar property, but the peak pressure occurs between 60-70%). The effect with methanol is very Gaussian with a peak pressure observed with a 50/50 mixture. An exothermic reaction results from an initial mixture of the two solutions (MeOH and Water) releasing some gas. When preparing solutions it is best to allow the solution to rest for a few minutes to out-gas before topping off or using in the HPLC system.

I hope that this short discussion about some of the differences between these two popular HPLC solvents will aid you in developing better quality HPLC and LC-MS methods.

Reference: Table of HPLC Solvent Properties

Saturday, July 8, 2017

HPLC COLUMN TEST MIXTURE SOLUTIONS; NP & RP EXAMPLES



When selecting standards for use in testing an HPLC column OR for evaluation of an HPLC system’s performance (e.g. System Suitability, Performance Verification, Retention), in addition to selecting special high purity chemical compounds, consider using the actual sample which is specific to the method or application. Characterize the sample’s retention time (esp. K prime), peak shape and spectra (if applicable) and use the data to measure, compare and detect changes in  performance over time. This can be combined with a suitable test mixture to provide more comprehensive results.

Common HPLC Column Test Mixtures:

Running Sugars on an Amino Column? Use simple and complex sugars as standards. Example: D-Fructose; D-Glucose; Lactose; Maltose; Sucrose.

NP (prepare the test solution in a mixture of Hexane/Ethanol, as appropriate)
Diethyl phthalate; Dimethyl phthalate; Toluene; Benzene.

RP (prepare a fresh test solution in ACN/Water or Methanol/Water, as applicable)
Select 4 or 5 of these compounds for use in a mix. Uracil; Benzene, Acetophenone; Toluene; Naphthalene; N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide; Phenol;  diethyl phthalate; diamyl phthalate; di-n-hexyl phthalate; dioctyl phthalate.

Include a Void Marker in your Test Solution:
Always measure the actual void volume of your specific HPLC column with a compound which is un-retained by your column. For RP applications which utilize at least 20% organic, Uracil or Thiourea are often used, but some inorganic salts (e.g. sodium nitrite and sodium nitrate) have also been shown to work as well. Monitor by UV detection. 
 
  • You must know what the Method's void time is for every HPLC method that you run BEFORE starting to analyze any samples. This is one of the most fundamental aspects of using HPLC so make sure you understand and can show what this value is.


Saturday, May 20, 2017

Chromatography Basics - Coffee Filter Chromatography

This month I would like to promote sharing and learning about chromatography with others. As scientists, sharing and passing on information to others is key to introducing new people to how we use science and the scientific method to explore what things are made of. Examples of chromatography are often seen in every-day life. For example, a spilled liquid drink on a napkin often reveals different colored or toned rings radiating out, hinting at the many compounds present within the one solution.

One of the simplest examples of a paper chromatography method can be set up and safely run at home. A jar with some water serves as the mobile phase and a coffee filter as the "Column" or support. Ordinary ballpoint pen ink (i.e. blue) or a magic marker can provide "samples" to evaluate. If available, various pure alcohols can replace the water and used as mobile phase solution(s) which may improve resolution. 

Over the past decades I have used these simple setups to demonstrate both what the analytical technique of chromatography is and how it works to hundreds of people of all ages and backgrounds. Many of examples can be found on the web and I have included a link below to one of the more recent published methods from Scientific American magazine. Please demonstrate and share it with others. Perhaps in doing so you will unleash the curiosity of someone to delve deeper into understanding what things are made of or the scientific fields?

  Link to an article illustrating how to run some paper liquid chromatography experiments at home. "Chromatography: Be a Color Detective"

Saturday, April 8, 2017

LC-MS Contamination? Another Possible Cause. Are your Mobile Phase Bottles and Pick up Filters Clean ?

One of the more common LC/MS problems I am asked to help solve deals with contaminated LC-MS or LC/MS/MS systems. Over time, many systems will become contaminated with a wide variety of plasticizers, detergents, salts, metals and ion pairing agents that routine source cleaning will not remove. Often, these compounds are introduced to the system through the tools used (e.g. pipettes) chemicals, solvents, mobile phase additives or even the samples themselves. "Dirty" samples sometimes persist inside the system long after the analysis work is complete, leaving material in poorly maintained injection valves but also through the use of poorly washed / contaminated and fouled HPLC columns. Even the modern inline HPLC vacuum degasser has proven to be a source of contamination. 

In addition to the above mentioned sources of contamination, another more obvious source of contamination should always be addressed early in the process of cleaning the system. Specifically, the glass mobile phase bottles and the associated solvent pickup tubing and solvent pickup filters used with them. Contamination in these areas may directly infuse the system with undesirable material. Good cleaning and maintenance practices must be maintained to reduce this source of potential contamination. 

As a general guideline, we shall not place our mobile phase reservoir bottles in any type of dishwasher or wash them using any dish soaps. These may leave a residue easily detected by even the weakest mass spectrometer. Avoid contamination by purchasing high quality glass bottles with vented caps to keep dust out. If rinsing with organic solvents (and/or freshly prepared and filtered high resistance water) does not clean them, you can try a Nitric Acid rinse (up to 30%) followed by a neutralizing wash in 2M Sodium hydroxide. Follow-up with many rinses of HPLC Grade water (or LC/MS grade), oven drying, then re-fill with an appropriate mobile phase. Don't forget to replace those solvent pickup filters too. While many 316 SS pickup filters can be cleaned, most of the sintered glass style filters are designed to be disposed of (not cleaned or put in an ultrasonic cleaner!). So periodically dispose of the glass types and install new filters and fresh mobile phase into those recently cleaned bottles (before you start looking for the source of contamination in the more expensive parts of the instrument, clean or replace the filters). - Please don't re-contaminate an expensive HPLC or LC/MS system and invalidate your methods and data because you skipped replacing a $10 part. Keep commonly used spare parts in-stock and always maintain a clean system.