This article will address the use of disposable female, Luer-compatible,
syringe filters without built-in pre-filters for the filtration of individual samples
into vials for HPLC or LC/MS analysis. - Note: 96 or 384 multi-well filtering
plates provide for a better solution when large quantities of samples need to
be filtered. Note: The presented filter membrane material selection criteria also applies to mobile phase filtration too.
The choice of syringe filter depends on the: filter size (volume)
of your sample, the chemical compatibility of the housing and
membrane and desired pore size. Selection of the wrong filter size can result in too much sample
holdup volume (loss of sample on filter) or overloading of the filter (allowing
unfiltered material to pass through). If a membrane or housing is chosen which
is not chemically compatible with your solution, then contamination of the sample
or rupture of the assembly can result. Choosing a filter with too large a pore size can result in material passing through it which could clog or contaminate the solution (i.e. plug an HPLC system or result in a loss of sterility of a solution). Protein binding affinity is another
characteristic of filter membranes and if you are filtering samples of
biological interest, then you will also want to consider this specification in
your selection criteria too (though it will not be discussed in this article).
Syringe Filter Size:
Filters are available in a variety
of sizes which are generally in a disc shape and described by their diameter.
Common sizes available for chromatography samples include: 3 mm, 4 mm, 13 mm and 25 mm (~25 - 30 mm)
diameter discs. The larger the diameter of the disc, the larger the sample
capacity, cross sectional surface area and potential hold-up volume of the
sample on the filter.
Hold-up volume is important because
some of the sample will be retained inside the membrane and/or filter housing. If
too large a filter is selected, samples with small volumes could be lost entirely
in the hold-up volume on the membrane. Smaller filters have lower hold-up volumes. To extract as much sample as possible, be
sure and use a post-filtration air purge to reduce the total hold-up volume.
If the volume of the sample you
wish to filter is under 1 ml, then a 3 mm filter may provide the lowest hold-up
volume and require the smallest amount of solution. To filter samples between
1 ml and 10 ml, the 13 mm diameter filter provides a good balance between hold-up
volume and large filter surface area. Larger sample volumes from 5 ml to 50 ml
are often filtered through the more common 25 mm diameter filters (~4 times the
filtration area as a 13 mm disc).
Chemical Compatibility:
Membrane Material: This is
where you really must consult the manufacturer’s own documentation for the most
compatible filter membrane for both your sample and the solution that will flow
through the filter. To simplify the selection criteria, we can make some generalizations
about some of the different types available:
Cellulose Acetate (CA): Use
with aqueous solutions and a few hydrocarbons only. Low protein binding so good
for many biological samples. Not compatible with ACN or DMSO. Can be
autoclaved.
Nylon: Great general
purpose material and compatible with many HPLC solvents (including THF,
alcohols, ACN), but not strong acids. Nylon has a high affinity to bind
proteins. Can be autoclaved.
Polysulfone / Polyethersulfone
Variants (PS / PES): Commonly used with tissue culture and ion
chromatography samples. Stable with many strong bases and alcohols, but few
HPLC solvents (as it is hydrophilic). Low backpressure and low protein binding.
Not compatible with ACN. Can be autoclaved.
Polypropylene (PP): General
purpose hydrophilic material with resistance to most acids, bases, DMF, DMSO
and alcohols. Not recommended for use with hydrocarbons, esters or solvents
such as ACN. Can be autoclaved.
Polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF): Hydrophilic material with broad compatibility. Often a good choice for use
with alcohols, hydrocarbons, biomolecules, ether and ACN. Low protein binding. Can
be autoclaved.
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE): Reported in most brochures to be chemically resistant to almost all solvents, strong acids and bases.
Hydrophobic membrane should be pre-wetted when used with aqueous solutions. Low
protein binding and very strong. Can be autoclaved.
Most chromatography grade syringe filters are constructed of either HDPE or PP. These materials are compatible with a wide range of HPLC solvents and both offer low levels of extractables. HDPE has been reported to be more chemically compatible with aqueous basic solutions of NH4OH than PP.
Most chromatography grade syringe filters are constructed of either HDPE or PP. These materials are compatible with a wide range of HPLC solvents and both offer low levels of extractables. HDPE has been reported to be more chemically compatible with aqueous basic solutions of NH4OH than PP.
Pore Size:
This will depend on your application and a number of different pore sizes are commonly available from vendors (1 micron, 0.8, 0.45 and 0.22 micron are the most common):
For example, is sterilization of the fluid the goal? If so, a 0.22 micron filter is generally accepted as the best choice.
For most chromatography or LC-MS applications either a 0.45 or 0.22 micron filters are preferred.
For example, is sterilization of the fluid the goal? If so, a 0.22 micron filter is generally accepted as the best choice.
For most chromatography or LC-MS applications either a 0.45 or 0.22 micron filters are preferred.
Summary:
- Please refer to the various manufacturers data sheets to select an appropriate syringe filter with: (1) a low hold-up volume; (2) large enough size for the volume of sample; (3) which is chemically compatible with the solution and material you are going to inject through it and (4) lowest protein binding affinity (if applicable).
- To reduce the hold-up volume, use a post-filtration air purge to empty the filter.
- Minimize contamination from extractables (in the plastic) by pre-rinsing the filter membrane with some of the clean solution. This can reduce the amount of detectable extractables in your sample. PTFE based membranes have some of the lowest extractable levels so consider their use if this is an issue.
- If analyte binding is a concern, select one of the membranes which has the lowest binding affinity such as PVDF or PTFE.
No comments:
Post a Comment
ALL Comments are 100% Moderated to prevent SPAM. ANY/ALL SPAM comments are reported to GOOGLE and Automatically DELETED (They will NEVER appear on this BLOG).