Translator for HPLC HINTS and TIPS for Chromatographers

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Modern HPLC Method Development Tips (PART II):

This is the second of two articles (Part I) which will provide suggestions on how to improve the HPLC (UHPLC) method development process. - PART II



INITIAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT:
  1. Before you start, learn what you can about your sample, its hazards, solubility and properties. Conduct a quick literature and/or keyword search on the web using a popular search engine (e.g. GOOGLE). You can often find many journal articles, white papers, application notes and chemical data on the web in just a few minutes.
  2. Determine which liquids your compound(s) are soluble in. Use a pipette and several glass vials or tubes with different solutions (pH is important too). This will narrow down the types of mobile phase and chromatography modes that you can use.
  3. Column choice is the most important part of method development. The stationary phase that you choose has the single greatest effect on selectivity! Select the right column and mode of chromatography. Most RP methods should start with at least a modern ultra high purity, metal free type B silica column with a C8 or C18 support (*But you must select the column type that best suits your application). For small molecules (<1,000 Daltons) select a standard sized analytical column with a 2.5 to 5.0 micron particle size and pore size between 60 and 120 Ã… (e.g. 4.6 x 150 mm; 3.0 x 100 mm). *For larger peptide or protein molecules you will need a particle with a large pore size (~ 300 Ã…). For optimal results, columns with very small internal volumes should be paired with HPLC systems with similar ultra-low internal delay volumes. Your HPLC system should be optimized to balance the needs of good mixing, low delay volume and proper sampling rate for your method. If the method is likely to be transferred to different types of HPLC systems, then you may want to initially stay away from the < 2.1 u particle supports for your method development. At this time, these tiny particles can not be reliably packed into columns as well as the larger sized particles and generally have much poorer %RSD values than larger particles (i.e. 2.5 to 5 u). Method development is initially easier & generally more rugged using conventional particle sizes [Keep things simple when starting out. You can always change later on]. Once you have selected a column and decided on a flow rate, make sure you calculate and measure the actual column void volume to find the 'Tzero value' (column dwell volume). You will need this value to find out if your compound has been retained on the column (K prime) and to also determine most of the needed performance calculations and parameters.
  4. Once you have selected an HPLC column (if possible, please start with a brand new column) you will need to test it and establish a baseline to show that it meets both the manufacturer’s specifications and, far more importantly, that it meets your method’s requirements. In most cases, do not use the manufacturer’s QC test solution for this. Those stds are designed to allow the column to easily pass manufacturing QC, not the more critical requirements that you may need to prove. We prefer to use a real sample mixture (~2 compounds) that are similar to the type proposed for the method. They must be well retained on the column (K prime of > 2), easy to prepare, stable and reliable. This std and the specific method you develop for it, will be used to prove the column’s performance (i.e. R, S, K prime, Tzero, Plates). It will be used again, when the column’s performance is called into question.  
  5. Notes on Mobile phase and additives: Keep it simple. Avoid the use of any additives such as ion-pairing reagents when first starting out. They are overused in general and can cause problems later on. If required, they can always be added later on. Use only HPLC grade solvents, fresh RO HPLC grade Water and the highest purity acids, bases and/or additives, if required. Use only filtered (0.22u) products. Always dissolve samples in the mobile phase (or a weaker solution) for injection. For many RP methods a low pH mobile phase (~ pH 2.5) provides a good starting place. Samples with a pKa far enough away from this value are likely to be retained, stable and unaffected by small changes in pH. *pH is usually one of the last parameters which is optimized.
  6. Use a Gradient Method to find the approximate elution conditions of the mixture AND make sure you are detecting all of the compounds injected onto the column [For dedicated RP isocratic methods, start with a high organic mobile phase % (i.e. 95%) and record the results. Continue to reduce the organic content in steps of 10% and observe where the best compromise exists between retention and elution]. For RP gradient methods, start with a very high aqueous % (e.g. 98%) and run your gradient, slowly, to a very high organic % (e.g. 95% or 98%, not 100%!) to make sure you retain, hold, and then elute everything. Your mobile phase conditions must be strong enough to elute everything off the column during the gradient portion of the run (long enough hold time). Please Do NOT include the gradient reversal portion back to initial conditions (wash and re-equilibration) of the gradient as part of the same analysis method. The method should end after the gradient has reached and been held at its maximum level for a period of time (we refer to this as the "hold time"). It should NOT switch back to the initial conditions to re-equilibrate the column. Don't make this novice mistake. Column flushing and re-equilibration should be a separate method and/or step, separate from your analysis method. If you include your column flushing (washing) and re-equilibration steps as part of your analysis method, you are also forcing the baseline's slope to change radically. This may interfere with integration plus include extra peaks and baseline changes that you are going to have to integrate, identify and explain to others (e.g. auditors). Additionally, including these wash steps as part of the same method wastes time as you must wait for these steps to complete before you can start to process the data obtained in the analysis method. Summary: Develop methods like the professionals do and create separate Analysis and Flush/Re-Equilibration Methods (or steps).
  7. If your compounds can be seen with a UV/VIS detector, then make sure you are using a Diode Array Detector (aka, DAD or PDA) set to scan a wide range of wavelengths (e.g. 210 - 410 nm). Method development should not be performed using a single or multi-wavelength detector. This invites errors, limits the utility of the method and does not result in any cost savings. You must have a full scanning detector so you can detect all possible peaks at the same time. If you use a single or dual wavelength detector you may not know if an impurity has been introduced or if you have a co-eluter (because you will have no way to detect it). Generic starting settings for Wavelength Bandwidth should be ~ 8 nm, software based Reference Wavelength OFF and the sampling rate must be set to collect at least 20+ peaks/sample peak of the narrowest sample peak observed and integrated (at ½ height). Run with scanning turned 'on' for all analysis methods and review the spectral data for each run. This provides important qualitative data about the compounds which may be used for purity determination and also to demonstrate how the method is selective for the compound(s) of interest. *If your compounds do not absorb well (weak chromophores), then you may still want to have a UV/VIS detector inline (first) with a secondary detector second. The UV/VIS detector will still be very useful for troubleshooting and detecting other compounds. Select an appropriate type of detector and compatible mobile phase as required for the secondary detector (e.g. RID, EC, FLD, ELSD, CAD, MS...). Note: If available, LC-DAD-MS is one of the most useful instrument setups for LC method development.
  8. This needs to be repeated (from Part I)....  Before starting ANY HPLC analysis, the HPLC pump must be running and operating with no problems, achieving a stable baseline, steady flow rate with as little pulsation as possible (~ 1% ripple or less). Accuracy depends on this. Do not begin any HPLC analysis unless the HPLC pumping system is working perfectly.


7 comments:

  1. I am just starting out in HPLC and these posts are a big help to me. Even the more experienced ones here tell me that have learned a lot from reading your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SUPER! That other website, chrom - forum.org sucks. Lots of new users giving BAD advice on that group. This site is great!!! PRACTICAL information from someone who actually does HPLC and makes it easy to understand. These posts and web page is the most useful one of all. We appreciate it so much.

    Our lab has 40 chemists and your posts have helped us many times show our clients that they are giving us LC methods which do not meet any guidelines (as you say, many have peaks eluting at the column void volume --- for VALIDATED METHODS!). These posts help us to make better methods. If you come to France, please let us know so we can invite you to our company to give us a class. I have sent you an email.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the kind works and the email invitation to customize a training class for your company. I am very pleased to hear that your lab finds the information of great value to them in their work. Most of these articles are taken from the course notes I hand out in the classes I teach and consulting projects I work on.

      Delete
  3. When you are working with a gradient how should you handle several analysis in a row, for example if i start a 95/5 aqueos/organic combination and end in a high organic proportion like 10/90, and i dont switch back in gradient to high aqueous i might get buffer salt precipitation and baseline shift if i start another injection as it is,but since the article says to not include this part on the method, i have to use a different flushing method between every single injection? or how would you handle this?

    Thanks for information!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Back in the late 1970's through the 1980's many people were taught to combine all of the equilibration and re-initialization steps of an HPLC method into ONE giant method. This was the result of a lack of automation (few had autosamplers and we still used strip chart recorders (or perhaps an Integrator!) to record chromatograms!). When computers and automation appeared, everything changed, but not everyone caught up with the changes. I teach modern HPLC method development and we utilize modern technology to make our analysis methods more accurate, scientific and less time consuming. Many of the current books and articles written have not kept pace with these modern methods. However, you can learn to improve your methods and techniques and that it what I present and teach.

      Proper HPLC Analysis should be divided up into THREE steps (the last two steps are usually saved as "Methods" to make the whole process convenient and simple). It is very bad practice to try and 'do everything' in the same method. This usually indicates a lack of modern HPLC method development training. Here is what a well designed procedure should look like.

      The first step is to condition and EQUILIBRATE the column at "Initial Conditions" (the same as the starting composition percentages. 95/5 in your example). You run mobile phase at these initial conditions (while monitoring) until you achieve a nice flat baseline. When the system is ready and the column fully equilibrated, you run tha Analysis Method. Inject your sample, run the actual analysis and collect and store the data. If it is a gradient analysis, then it should end with a hold step at your max composition (10/90 in your example) for a period of time. This is to insure that 'everything' is eluted off the column. Finally, after the analysis method is complete, a third WASH method is run to flush off any remaining material and recondition the column for use. Ideally, this involves using a stronger solvent (or composition) than found in the method. For RO methods, you would start at HIGH organic concentration (using your example, perhaps 98%), hold it there for a period of time, then ramp down slowly to your initial method condition (your example, 95/5) and hold again for a short period of time. Now the column is ready for equilibration followed by the analysis method. *This procedure insures that the column is properly washed and equilibrated BEFORE each analysis. It dramatically reduces carryover and column fouling over time. It also has the benefit of removing ALL unnecessary baseline changes seen when you change the mobile phase composition changes back to the initial conditions during the actual analysis run (which makes no sense to include them in your analysis). This reduces analysis time too since you are not waiting for the system to finish long after the analysis portion has ended.

      Delete
    2. IOW: To run a series of samples (where a gradient is used), follow up each dedicated "Analysis" method with a "Column Wash Method", then a "Column Equilibration Method". So three lines (three steps or methods) to run the one sample. This is very easy to set-up on a modern automated HPLC system.

      Starting with a clean, washed column... the steps are:
      Equilibration; Analysis; Wash; Equilibrate; Analysis; Wash; Equilibrate; Analysis; Wash; Equilibrate; Analysis; Wash... repeat as many times as needed.

      Delete
    3. Thanks a lot for the information!

      Cheers

      Delete

ALL Comments are 100% Moderated to prevent SPAM. ANY/ALL SPAM comments are reported to GOOGLE and Automatically DELETED (They will NEVER appear on this BLOG).