Translator for HPLC HINTS and TIPS for Chromatographers

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Peak Purity Determination by HPLC Diode Array Chromatography Software: Limitations and Uses

"Peak Purity" Determination by HPLC is one of the most abused and easily misunderstood features found in advanced liquid chromatography systems (e.g. HPLC, UHPLC and CE).

For HPLC, one or more inline detectors can be used which provide additional data about the peak’s physical or chemical properties. The data obtained can be compared to that of a pure standard, or known impurity. For compounds which absorb light in the region of most UV/VIS detectors (~ 200 to 900 nm), a single wavelength detector (e.g. UV/VIS) provides a second dimension of data, but a scanning, multi-wavelength detector can add a second and third dimension of data to the retention time. Scanning detectors, commonly known as Diode-Array Detectors (aka: DAD or PDA) are commonly used in HPLC and CE analysis (they are required for routine method development). A scanning DAD can provide detailed sample UV/VIS spectra across a range of wavelengths for each peak, at any retention time seen, allowing for a 3D plot of the spectra to be recorded much like a “fingerprint”. Pure compounds which absorb light across a pre-defined wavelength range should show identical spectral profiles (“slices”) across the upslope, apex and down slope of the resolved peak. "Impure" peaks may show dissimilar spectra across the width of the peak revealing the presence of a co-eluting peak (or impurity).  When a properly developed HPLC separation method or analysis is used to evaluate the purity of a sample, the single dimension of “retention time” is evaluated with additional dimensions of analysis such as the UV/VIS peak spectra. Peak Purity relies on the sample's spectral profile to detect the presence of an impurity that has co-eluted with the sample. This additional dimension of analysis is required to improve the confidence level that a peak is in fact correctly identified and does not contain any co-eluting compounds.

Diode-Array based Peak purity determination by HPLC is a qualitative assessment of the impurity profile of the sample. It is designed to reveal impurities, not prove peak purity. BTW: We really should rename it “Peak Spectral Impurity Assessment" because that is in fact what we are measuring. The algorithm used for Peak Purity determination is designed to confirm the presence of one or more impurities by comparing spectral data slices (multiple slices taken at the apex and both the upslope and down slope sections of the peak).  A mismatch would indicate the peak has not been fully resolved (one or more co-eluting peaks are present). It is impure by UV/VIS analysis. Note: It does not indicate that the compound is impure, but rather 'the peak' being measured is.

“Peak Purity” does not in fact indicate the actual purity of the compound, but instead indicates when a peak may be found to contain impurities. It is a measure of Impurity.

In simple terms, if the spectral slices obtained from one peak are not identical, than the peak may contain one or more impurities. Co-elution is the most likely reason.

Points to consider when using "Peak Purity" software:

  • The absence of any spectral differences across the peak is not an indication of actual purity;
  • Compounds similar to your sample may have similar absorbance profiles;
  • The relative concentration of actual impurities may not be high enough to detect;
  • The compounds / impurities may not absorb light at the wavelengths scanned;
  • The HPLC method used, the software settings and the parameters that you chose in the ‘Peak Purity’ software menu have a huge effect on the results obtained. Inputting poor quality settings or using a poor quality method often leads to misleading purity results.
  • The peak of interest must be retained on the column (K prime > 2) and resolved apart from any observed peaks. Don't use peak purity to analyze peak which elute at or near the column void volume (demonstrates lack of a method and specificity, fails validation).

We prefer to think of HPLC Peak Purity Assessment as a null test. If the recorded peak spectral data slices are different, than you probably have co-elution and/or impurities present (so try and develop a better method to resolve the peaks apart). If no differences in the spectra are seen (they are similar), then the peak may be pure or may contain compounds with similar spectra as are commonly seen with related reaction synthesis products or compounds. So only when you detect differences in the acquired spectra can you be confident that there is a qualitative difference or impurity present.

When configuring the Peak Purity parameters for your sample, you must start with a very high quality HPLC method (A "validated method" is not necessarily a high quality method). The correct detector sample rate, signal wavelength and bandwidths need to have been selected and used (Reference Wavelength OFF). The peaks shown in your chromatogram should have excellent symmetry with good on-column retention (K-prime), baseline separation (> 2.0) and very low baseline noise levels. The two spectral reference points should be manually selected and placed at times before and after the peak of interest in clear baseline areas where no other peaks or spectra are seen. Select at least 7 spectra from the sample peak for comparison (more detail can be provided with more spectra, but be careful not to select spectra near the noise limits). If your method and chromatogram are not of the highest quality, then please do not use the automated peak purity analysis feature, instead spend time improving your method.

The HPLC UV/VIS Peak Purity Analysis (“Peak Spectral Purity”) feature is very complex and has many software settings which must be set up correctly to obtain any scientifically useful data. * In many major laboratories, due to a lack of training, I see it being used incorrectly by most chromatographers on a regular basis. Worth repeating... the HPLC method used to obtain the original data must be of the highest quality and the training of the operator must also be at the highest level. To use the feature successfully, an advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography are required as are a detailed understanding of all of the peak purity software features (how to set the correct threshold, obtain reference baselines, Set sampling rate, noise levels, signal extraction, normalization settings…). Routine HPLC training classes do not cover these types of tasks. Specialized training and practical experience are required to use these tools. Never use the “automated” versions or the manufacturer’s default values to find “Peak Purity”. The only correct way to use these features is to manually tune the method and settings to your specific sample. Failure to customize the method and settings used may result in invalid data and incorrect purity determinations. 

In general, the recommendation for most chromatographers is to not use this feature unless first having demonstrated the required skills and advanced understanding of the fundamentals of chromatography.

©Copyright, March 1, 1996 by William Letter of Chiralizer Services (Plainsboro, NJ) from a portion of material presented in an HPLC Diode Array Method Development Class.

Saturday, November 26, 2016

HPLC Detector Optical SLIT WIDTH Selection

A few notes on HPLC Optical Slit Width selection:

  1. The chosen slit width setting determines the amount of light which is directed to the detector.
  2. For most HPLC methods, a slit width value of 4 nm is suggested. 
  3. Bandwidth should be set at least as wide as the optical slit width.

Characteristics of Narrow Optical Slit Widths:
  • Less light falls on the detector
  • Less signal intensity
  • Increased baseline noise
  • S/N ratio decreases
  • Spectral resolution improves which allows for more accurate spectral identification.
Characteristics of Wide Optical Slit Widths:
  • More light falls on the detector
  • Greater signal intensity
  • Decreased baseline noise 
  • S/N ratio improves
  • Spectral resolution decreases and detail is lost. Less accurate spectral identification and an increase in errors for spectral library matching.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Notes on Cleaning bound Protein from RP HPLC columns:

First, a few comments:

  • ·         Before proceeding with any column regeneration or cleaning procedures, always refer to the specific advice provided by the column manufacturer. Approved maintenance and cleaning instructions can often be found in the product guide which comes with the new column. Their guidelines supersede these!
  • ·         Columns are consumable items. After a suitable amount of use, the time and materials required to regenerate them may cost more than the purchase of a replacement column. Always have a new, spare column on hand.
  • ·         Protect your detector. Before washing or cleaning the column, disconnect the column outlet line and direct the column to waste only.
  •      Column Storage solutions are not the same as column wash solutions. Never store a column in buffer or ion pairing containing solutions.

For RP supports, if buffers have been used, always start by washing the column down with ultra-high purity water and some organic solvent (e.g. Water/MeOH, 95%/5%) to remove all salts. Use about 10 column volumes to flush these off.

Many polymeric resins (e.g. PS-DVB) can be effectively cleaned using 0.1 M Sodium Hydroxide solution or a mobile phase solution containing equal parts of isopropanol (IPA) and 3 M Guanidine hydrochloride at ~ 50 °C. Optionally, some success has been reported using other solutions such as: 5M Urea (pH 7) buffer solution; 1 M NaCl (pH 7) and even mixtures containing some methylene chloride solvent. Check with the manufacturer!

For RP silica based supports, we often use a series of wash solutions. In most cases, pure water or pure organic solvents such as MeOH or ACN will not remove bound protein. An acid, base or ion pairing reagent is often needed. One of the first general wash solutions to start with is a 1% Acetic acid solution in Methanol (50/50). If desired a stronger acid such as Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) can be swapped for the acetic acid (where possible, start with a weaker acid). This can be followed with a later solution where IPA replaces the MeOH (50/50). In both cases, adjust the pH to ~ 2.5. 5 M Urea solution has also proven effective in removing bound protein from silica supports too. Another salt solution that has shown some promise is 1 M sodium phosphate solution, pH 7.0. Run the salt solutions for about one hour at a moderate flow rate. Follow up with rinses of water and MeOH (80/20), then 90% MeOH/Water.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

HPLC Peak Splitting. Common Reasons For It

True "Split" HPLC peaks, not resulting from co-elution of another peak, can be caused by a number of chromatography problems. Here are a few examples and their solutions:

  1. Sample overload. Sample overloading is one of the most common reasons for observing peak "splitting". Reduce the sample concentration by factors of ten to see if the peak shape improves. 
  2.  A poor quality HPLC method. Poor quality methods which do not use mobile phase solutions which are at an appropriate pH, dissolve the sample in (are fully soluble) are unstable or show sample or mobile phase precipitation can cause this effect. Always check solubility before starting.
  3. A partially plugged or fouled column. A dirty or fouled column (from not washing down properly with a solution which is STRONGER than the mobile phase). Analysis methods should be followed by separate wash methods to remove all bound material and any late eluters,
  4. Wrong injection solution. Peak splitting may be the result of dissolving and injecting your sample in a solution that is stronger than your mobile phase. Dissolve and inject samples in the mobile phase or in a solution which is a slightly weaker solution (not stronger).
  5. A poorly packed column, void at column inlet or a dirty frit. These types of structural defects can each result in peak "splitting" (all of these are less common today than in the past using modern HPLC columns). When present, a dirty inlet frit can be replaced with a new one, or the column can sometimes be backflushed to remove any accumulated material.
  6. Detector data rate set too low. Too few peaks collected over time may result in integration errors and inaccurate peak symmetry problems. Read more about how to determine the best data collection rate at this link.